Stewardship or Agency? A Social Embeddedness Reconciliation of Conduct and Performance in Public Family Businesses

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0541

References

  • Anderson R. C., Reeb D. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. J. Finance (2003) 58(2):1301–1328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson R. C., Reeb D. Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49(2):209–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrègle J.-L., Hitt M., Sirmon D., Véry P. The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. J. Management Stud. (2007) 44(1):73–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arthurs J. D., Busenitz L. The boundaries and limitations of agency theory and stewardship theory in the venture capitalist/entrepreneur relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2003) 28(2):145–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth B. E., Johnson S. A., Hogg M. A., Terry D. J. Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts (2002) (Psychological Press, New York) 31–48Google Scholar
  • Beatty R. P., Zajac E. J. Managerial incentives, monitoring and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(2):313–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bennedsen M., Nielson K., Pérez-González F., Wolfenzon D. Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(2):647–691CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M., Schoar A. Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(4):1169–1208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M., Schoar A. The role of family in family firms. J. Econom. Perspect. (2006) 20(2):73–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N., Van Reenen J. Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. (2006) . CEP Discussion Paper 716, Centre for Economic Performance London School of Economics and Political Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K., Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement. Psych. Bull. (1991) 110(2):305–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P., Richardson J. G. The forms of capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (1986) (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT) 241–258Google Scholar
  • Bubolz M. Family as source, user and builder of social capital. J. Socio-Econom. (2001) 30(2):129–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1995) (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Casson M.Entrepreneurship (1990) (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, UK) Google Scholar
  • Chandler A.Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Claessens S., Djankov S., Fan J., Lang L. Expropriation of minority shareholders: Evidence from East Asia. (1999) . Working paper, The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Claessens S., Djankov S., Fan J., Lang L. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. J. Finance (2002) 57(6):2741–2771CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Covin J. G., Slevin D. P. Adherence to plans, risk taking, and environment as predictors of firm growth. J. High Tech. Management Res. (1998) 9(2):207–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Covin J. G., Slevin D. P., Hitt M. A., Ireland R. D., Camp S., Sexton D. The entrepreneurial imperatives of strategic leadership. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset (2002) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) 309–327Google Scholar
  • Cronqvist H., Nilsson M. Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2003) 38(4):695–719CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dacin T., Ventresca M., Beal B. D. The embeddedness of organizations: Dialogue and directions. J. Management (1999) 25(3):317–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daily C. M., McDougall P., Covin J. G., Dalton D. R. Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. J. Management (2002) 28(3):387–412CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis J. H., Schoorman R., Donaldson L. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(1):20–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz H. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. J. Law Econom. (1983) 26(2):375–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz H., Lehn K. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(6):1155–1177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamantropoulos A., Winklhofer H. Index construction with formative indicators. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(2):269–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P., Powell W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism amd collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donaldson L. The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(3):369–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreux D. R. Financing family business. Family Bus. Rev. (1990) 3(3):225–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama E., Jensen M. Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. (1983) 26(2):301–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick K., Davis J., McCollom M., Lansberg I.Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Gómez-Mejía L. R., Takács Haynes K., Nuñez-Nickel M., Jacobson K. J. L., Moyano-Fuentes J. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2007) 52(1):106–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2003) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Holderness C. G., Sheehan D. P. The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: An exploratory analysis. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 20(1):317–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homans G. C.The Human Group (1950) (Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York) Google Scholar
  • James H. S. Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. (1999) 6(1):41–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James H. S.Family Capitalism (2006) (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Jensen M. C. Agency costs of free cash flow. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(2):323–329Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):262–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kets de Vries M. F. R.Family Business: Human Dilemmas in the Family Firm (1996) (Thompson Publishing, London) Google Scholar
  • Kirzner I. M.Perception, Opportunity, and Profit (1979) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Knight F. H.Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Landes D. French entrepreneurship and industrial growth in the nineteenth century. J. Econom. Hist. (1949) 9:45–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Landes D. S.Dynasties: Fortunes and Misfortunes of the World's Great Family Businesses (2006) (Viking, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lansberg I.Succeeding Generations: Realizing the Dream of Families in Business (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Le Breton-Miller I., Miller D. Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2009) 33(6):1169–1191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lubatkin M. H., Ling Y., Schulze W. An organizational justice-based view of self-control and agency costs in family firms. J. Management Stud. (2007) 44(6):955–971CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maury B. Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. J. Corporate Finance (2006) 12(2):321–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I.Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage from Great Family Businesses (2005) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Miller M. H., Modigliani F. Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares. J. Bus. (1961) 34(4):411–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I., Lester R. Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly traded companies. Strategic Management J. (2010) 31(1):201–223Google Scholar
  • Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I., Scholnick B. Stewardship vs. stagnation in small family vs. non-family firms. J. Management Stud. (2008) 45(1):51–78Google Scholar
  • Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I., Lester R., Cannella A. Do family businesses outperform? A study of the Fortune 1000. J. Corporate Finance (2007) 13:829–858CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morck R. K., Yeung B. Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2003) 27(4):367–382CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morck R. K., Stangeland D., Yeung B., Morck R. K. Inherited wealth, corporate control and economic growth. Concentrated Corporate Ownership (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 319–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morck R. K., Wolfenzon D., Yeung B. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. J. Econom. Literature (2005) 43(3):655–720CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pérez-González F. Inherited control and firm performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(5):1559–1588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce J., Kostova T., Dirks K. Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(2):298–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt M. G., Hogg M. A., Terry D. J. Social identity dynamics in modern organizations: An organizational psychology/organizational behavior perspective. Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts (2002) (Psychological Press, New York) 13–30Google Scholar
  • Pratt M. G., Foreman P. O. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(1):18–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putnam R.Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (2000) (Simon & Schuster, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulze W. S., Lubatkin M. H., Dino R. Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(2):179–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulze W. S., Lubatkin M. H., Dino R., Buchholtz A. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(2):99–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. A survey of corporate governance. J. Finance (1997) 52(2):737–783CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stryker S., Yardley K., Honess T. Identity theory: Developments and extensions. Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspectives (1987) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 89–103Google Scholar
  • Tajfel H.Human Groups and Social Categories (1981) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tajfel H., Turner J. C., Austin W. G., Worchel S. An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. The Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations (1979) (Brooks-Cole, Monterey, CA) 33–37Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Villalonga B., Amit R. How do family ownership, management and control affect firm value? J. Financial Econom. (2006) 80(2):385–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volpin P. F. Governance with poor investor protection: Evidence from top executive turnover in Italy. J. Financial Econom. (2002) 64(1):61–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward J. L.Perpetuating the Family Business: 50 Lessons Learned from Long Lasting, Successful Families in Business (2004) (Family Enterprise Publishers, Marietta, GA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman N. Stewards, agents, and the founder discount. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(5):960–976CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber J., Lavelle L., Lowry T., Zellner W., Barrett A. Family, Inc.. Bus. Week (2003) November 10):100–114Google Scholar
  • Wiseman R., Gómez-Mejía L. R. A behavioural model of managerial risk taking. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(1):133–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yafeh Y., Yosha O. Large shareholders and banks: Who monitors and how? Econom. J. (2003) 113(484):128–146Google Scholar
  • Zahra S. A. Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Bus. Rev. (2005) 18(1):23–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.