Understanding the Role of Worker Interdependence in Team Selection

References

• Bacon D. R., Stewart K. A., Anderson E. S. Methods of assigning players to teams: A review and novel approach. Simulation Gaming (2001) 32(1):6–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal D. J., Cohen R. R., Burke M. J., McLendon C. L. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(6):989–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berscheid E., Lindzey G., Aronson E. Interpersonal attraction. Handbook of Social Psychology (1985) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Borman W. C., Motowidlo S. J., Schmitt N., Borman W. C. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations (1993) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 71–98Google Scholar
• Borman W. C., Motowidlo S. J. Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance (1997) 10(2):99–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Browning T. R. Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2001) 48(3):292–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang M.-H., Harrington J. E., Tesfatsion L., Judd K. L. Agent-based models of organizations. Handbook of Computational Economics II: Agent-Based Computational Economics (2006) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 1273–1337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox T. H.Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research and Practice (1993) (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Decker R., Overby J. D., Patz A. L. Management team formation for large scale simulations. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises (1995) 22(Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, Statesboro, GA) 128–129Google Scholar
• De Dreu C. K., Weingart W. L. R. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(4):741–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerard R. J. Teaming up: Making the transition to self-directed, team-based organizations. Acad. Management Executive (1995) 9(3):91–93Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P., Levinthal D. Choice structures and business strategy. Management Sci. (2008) 54(9):1638–1651Link, Google Scholar
• Gordon J. Work teams: How far have they come? Training (1992) 29(29):59–65Google Scholar
• Gully S. M., Devine D. J., Whitney D. J. A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Res. (1995) 26(4):497–520Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gully S. M., Incalcaterra K. A., Joshi A., Beaubien J. M. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(5):819–832Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Carley K. M., Krackhardt D., Wholey D. Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 81(2):226–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen D. R., Hollenbeck J. R., Johnson M., Jundt D. Team in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Rev. Psych. (2005) 56:517–543Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin P. Work motivation and productivity in voluntarily formed work teams: A field study in China. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1993) 54(1):133–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katzenbach J. R., Smith D. K.The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization (1993) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Lawler E. E., Mohrman S. A., Ledford G. E.Creating High Performance Organizations: Practices and Results of Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 Companies (1995) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• LePine J. A., Hanson M. A., Borman W. C., Motowidlo S. J., Ferris G. R. Contextual performance and teamwork: Implications for staffing. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (2001) 19(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 53–90Google Scholar
• Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21(4):384–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E., Arrow H., Berdahl J. The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (2000) 4(1):95–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgram S. The small world problem. Psych. Today (1967) 2(1):60–67Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.A Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research (1979) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Argote L., Krishnan R., Nye J. L., Brower A. M. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. What's Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 57–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson F. P., Reider M. H., Campion M. A. Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psych. (2005) 58(3):583–611Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nazimowitz A. NHL expansion means realignments, new playoff structure. Associated Press (1997) June 17Google Scholar
• Pennings J. Differentiation, interdependence and performance in formal organizations. (1974) Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological AssociationMontrealGoogle Scholar
• Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–311Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. (2007) 53(7):1068–1085Link, Google Scholar
• Salas E., Dickinson T. L., Converse S. A., Tannenbaum S. I., Swezey R. W., Salas E. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. Teams: Their Training and Performance (1992) (ABLEX, Norwood, NJ) 3–29Google Scholar
• Schachter S. Deviation, rejection, and communication. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1951) 46(2):190–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senn D. Attraction as a function of similarity-dissimilarity in task performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1971) 18(1):120–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solow D., Vairaktarakis G., Piderit S. K., Tsai M. Managerial insights into the effects of interactions on replacing members of a team. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):1060–1073Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Baum J. Interorganizational complexity and computation. Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) 664–685Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum S. I., Beard R. L., Salas E., Kelley K. Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. Issues, Theory, and Research in Industrial/Organizational Psychology (1992) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 117–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tziner A., Eden J. C. Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? J. Appl. Psych. (1985) 70(1):85–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Zelst R. H. Sociometrically selected work teams increase production. Personnel Psych. (1952a) 5(3):175–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Zelst R. H. Validation of a sociometric regrouping procedure. J. Abnormal Psych. (1952b) 47(2):299–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wall T. D., Kemp N. J., Jackson P. R., Clegg C. W. Outcomes of autonomous workgroups: A long-term field experiment. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(2):280–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature (1998) 393(6684):440–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young M., Dawson-Pick D., Davies B.Business Matters: A Prophet Unheard (1992) (BBC Video, UK) Television seriesGoogle Scholar