Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0556

References

  • Antonacopulou E., Vince R., Reynolds M. The dynamics of reflexive practice: The relationship between learning and changing. Organizing Reflection Ashgate (2004) (Aldershot, UK)47–64Google Scholar
  • Bateson G.Steps to an Ecology of Mind (1972) (University Of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):312–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):3–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Black L., Carlile P., Repenning N. A dynamic theory of expertise and occupational boundaries in new technology implementation: Building on Barley's study of CT scanning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49(4):572–607Google Scholar
  • Blackler F. Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organ. Stud. (1995) 16(6):1021–1046CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P.The Logic of Practice (1990) (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowen G. A. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Res. (2008) 8(1):137–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):40–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Knowledge and organization: A social practice perspective. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(2):198–213LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P.The Social Life of Information (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chaiklin S., Lave J.Understanding Practice. Perspectives on Activity and Context (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chia R., Holt R. Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organ. Stud. (2006) 27(5):635–655CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chia R., Holt R. On managerial knowledge. Management Learn. (2008) 39(2):141–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Contu A., Willmott H. Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):283–296LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cook S. D., Brown J. S. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):381–400LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cook S. D., Yanow D. Culture and organizational learning. J. Management Inquiry (1993) 2(4):373–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R. Relationality. Organ. Stud. (2005) 26(11):1689–1710CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Czarniawska B., Kalthoff M., Rottenburg R., Wagener H.-J. Organizational translations. Facts and Figures: Economic Representations and Practices (2000) (Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Czarniawska B., Hernes T.Actor-Network Theory and Organizing (2005) (Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen) Google Scholar
  • Daniels H., Daniels H. Introduction. An Introduction to Vygotsky (1996) (Routledge, London) 1–32Google Scholar
  • Dreyfus H., Durfee H. A., Rodier D. Alternative philosophical conceptualizations of psychopathology. Phenomenology and Beyond: The Self and Its Language (1989) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 41–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreyfus H., Polt R. Can there be a better source of meaning than everyday practices? Reinterpreting division I of Being and Time in the light of division II. Heidegger's Being and Time: Critical Essays (2005) (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD) 141–154Google Scholar
  • Engeström Y. Activity theory as a framework for analysing and redesigning work. Ergonomics (2000) 43(7):960–974CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engeström Y. Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. J. Ed. Work (2001) 14(11):33–56Google Scholar
  • Engeström Y., Blackler F. On the life of the object. Organ. (2005) 12(3):307–330Google Scholar
  • Engeström Y., Middleton D.Cognition and Communication at Work (1996) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engeström Y., Miettinen R., Punamäki R.-L.Perspectives on Activity Theory (1999) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–629LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foucault M.Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1979) (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK) Google Scholar
  • Foucault M., Dreyfus H. L., Rabinow P. The subject and power. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (1982) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 208–226Google Scholar
  • Garfinkel H.Studies in Ethnomethodology (1967) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Gherardi S. From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations (2001) 54(1):131–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gherardi S.Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning (2006) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Gherardi S., Nicolini D. Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance? J. Management Stud. (2002) 39(4):419–436CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gubrium J., Holstein J. A.The New Language of Qualitative Method (1997) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Handley K., Sturdy A., Fincham R., Clarke T. Within and beyond communities of practice. J. Management Stud. (2006) 43(3):641–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey D.Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (1996) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Heidegger M., Stambaugh Joan. Being and Time (1929) (SUNY Press, Albany, NY) Google Scholar
  • Henke C. The mechanics of workplace order: Toward a sociology of repair. Berkeley J. Sociol. (2000) 44:55–81Google Scholar
  • Hutchins E.Cognition in the Wild (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James W.Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth (1978) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) . [Orig. pub. 1907.]Google Scholar
  • Knights D., Wilmott H.Labour Process Theory (1990) (MacMillan, Basingstoke, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laclau E., Mouffe C.Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (2001) 2nd ed.(Verso, London) Google Scholar
  • Latour B.Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Lave J.Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life (1988) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Law J., Bijker W. E., Hughes T. P., Pinch T. Technology and heterogeneous engineering. The case of Portuguese expansion. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (1987) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 111–134Google Scholar
  • Lawrence T. B., Suddaby R., Clegg S., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B., Nord W. R. Institutions and institutional work. Sage Handbook of Organization Studies (2006) 2nd ed.(Sage, London) 215–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindberg K., Czarniawska B. Knotting the action net, or organizing between organizations. Scand. J. Management (2006) 22(4):292–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindkvist L. Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: A typology of knowledge work in groups. J. Management Stud. (2005) 42(6):1189–1210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Llewellyn N. Organization in actual episodes of work: Harvey Sacks and organization studies. Organ. Stud. (2008) 29(5):763–791CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Llewellyn N., Hindmarsh J.Organization, Interaction and Practice: Studies of Real Time Work and Organising (2009) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lounsbury M. Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (2008) 33(4–5):349–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lynch M., Schatzki T., Knorr Cetina K., Von Savigny E. Ethnomethodology and the logic of practice. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (2001) (Routledge, London) 131–148Google Scholar
  • Martin P. Y. “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender Soc. (2004) 17(3):342–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolini D. Stretching out and expanding medical practices. The case of telemedicine. Human Relations (2007) 60(6):889–920CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolini D. Articulating and writing practice through the interview to the double. Management Learn. (2009a) 40(2):195–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolini D. Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organ. Stud. (2009b) 30(12):1391–1348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolini D., Gherardi S., Yanow D., Nicolini D., Gherardi S., Yanow D. Introduction. Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach (2003) (ME Sharpe, Armonk, NY) 3–31Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):249–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orr J.Talking About Machines: Ethnography of a Modern Job (1996) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Østerlund C., Carlile P., Huysman M., Wulf V. How practice matters: A relational view on knowledge sharing. Communities and Technologies (2003) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(5):793–815CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pritchard C., Hull R., Chumer M., Willmott H.Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning (2000) (Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK) Google Scholar
  • Rorty R.Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Samra-Fredericks D. Strategic practice, “discourse” and the everyday interactional constitution of “power effects”. Organization (2005) 12(6):803–841CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schatzki T. The sites of organizations. Organ. Stud. (2005) 26(3):465–484CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schatzki T. R., Schatzki T. R., Knorr-Cetina K., von Savigny E. Introduction: Practice theory. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (2001) (Routledge, London) 1–14Google Scholar
  • Schatzki T. R.The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Exploration of the Constitution of Social Life and Change (2002) (Penn State University Press, University Park, PA) Google Scholar
  • Star S. L., Griesemer J. R. Institutional ecology, “translations,” and coherence: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1989) 19(3):387–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suchman L.Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (2007) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Swan J., Scarbrough H. The politics of networked innovation. Human Relations (2005) 58(7):913–943CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor J. R., Robichaud D. Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sensemaking. Organization (2004) 11(3):395–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H.Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Turner S.The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge, and Presuppositions (1994) (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Vygotsky L.Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) . [Orig. pub. 1934.]Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Roberts K. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):357–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):409–412LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wenger E.Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity (1998) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wertsch J. V., del Rio P., Alvarez A.Sociocultural Studies of Mind (1995) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittgenstein L.Philosophical Investigations (1953) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Yanow D. Seeing organizational learning: A “cultural” view. Organization (2000) 7(2):247–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yanow D., Schwartz-Shea P.Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn (2006) (ME Sharpe, Armonk, NY) Google Scholar
  • Zilber T. B. Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):234–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.