CROSSROADS—Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms

References

• Aldrich H. E. Organizational boundaries and inter-organizational conflict. Human Relations (1971) 24(4):279–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M.Understanding Organizational Culture (2002) (Sage Publications, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos C., Lewis M. W. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):696–717Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
• Argyris C. Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21(3):363–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur W. B.Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (1994) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashkenas R. Creating the boundaryless organization. Bus. Horizons (1999) 42(5):5–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashkenas R., Ulrich D., Jick T., Kerr S.The Boundaryless Organization: Breaking the Chains of Organizational Structure (2002) 3rd ed.(Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Badaracco J. L., Meyer J. R., Gustafson J. M. Changing forms of the corporation. The U.S. Business Corporation: An Institution in Transition (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 67–91Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beech N., Huxham C. Cycles of identity formation in interorganizational collaborations. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. (2004) 33(3):28–52Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouchikhi H. Living with and building on complexity: A constructivist perspective on organizations. Organization (1998) 5(2):217–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M.Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A., Schreyögg G., Sydow J. Strategic consequences of co-evolutionary lock-in: Insights from a longitudinal process study. The Hidden Dynamics of Path Dependence: Institutions and Organizations (2010) (Palgrave Macmillan, London) 233–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll J. B.Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J., McGrath R. G. Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information-intensive economy. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1135–1148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciborra C. U. The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):103–118Link, Google Scholar
• Crozier M., Child J., Crozier M., Mayntz R. Will a new logic of management emerge? Societal Change Between Market and Organization (1993) (Avebury, Aldershot, UK) 19–29Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lewin A. Y. Where are the theories for the “new” organizational forms? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(4):i–viGoogle Scholar
• Daft R. L., Weick K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):284–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R. A.Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• David P. A. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(2):332–337Google Scholar
• Davidow W. H., Malone M. S.The Virtual Corporation (1992) (Harper Collins, New York) Google Scholar
• DeFillipi R. J., Arthur M. B. Paradox in project-based enterprise: The case of film making. Calif. Management Rev. (1998) 40(2):125–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Rond M., Bouchikhi H. On the dialectics of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(1):56–69Link, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Monge P. Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):693–703Link, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35(12):1504–1510Link, Google Scholar
• Dosi G., Hobday M., Marengo L., Helfat C. E. Problem-solving behaviors, organizational forms, and the complexity of tasks. The SMS Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities: Emergence, Development, and Change (2003) (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA) 167–192Google Scholar
• Duncan R. B., Kilmann R. H., Pondy L. R., Slevin D. P. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The management of Organization Design: Strategies and Implementation (1976) 1(Elsevier, New York) 167–188Google Scholar
• Duschek S., Ortmann G., Sydow J., Ortmann G., Sydow J. Grenzmanagement in Unternehmungsnetzwerken: Theoretische Zugänge und der Fall eines strategischen Dienstleistungsnetzwerks. Boundary management in inter-firm networksStrategie und Strukturation: Strategisches Management von Unternehmen, Netzwerken und KonzernenStrategy and Structuration: Strategic Management of Firms, Networks and Concerns (2001) (Gabler, Wiesbaden) 191–233Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Furr N. R., Bingham C. B. Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(6):1263–1273Link, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M. Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. (2010) 35(2):202–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–629Link, Google Scholar
• Flint D. J. Compressing new product success-to-success cycle time: Deep customer value understanding and idea generation. Indust. Marketing Management (2002) 31(4):305–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford J. D., Ford L. W. Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(4):756–785Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Kumaraswamy A., Langlois R. N.Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations (2002) (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P.Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(2):209–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (1984) (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Gilbert C. G. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graetz F., Smith A. C. T. The role of dualities in arbitrating continuity and change in forms of organizing. Internat. J. Management Rev. (2008) 10(3):265–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(4):619–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104(5):1439–1493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):693–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82(5):929–964Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49(2):149–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedlund G. A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(S2):73–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E., Peteraf M. A. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):997–1010Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M. A., Singh H., Teece D. J., Winter S. G.Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (2007) (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
• Heracleous L., Barrett M. Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):755–778Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G. Do modular products lead to modular organizations? Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(6):501–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilinitch A. Y., D'Aveni R. A., Lewin A. Y. New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):211–220Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobides M. G., Billinger S. Designing the boundaries of the firm: From “make, buy, or ally” to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(2):249–261Link, Google Scholar
• Kellogg K. C., Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):22–44Link, Google Scholar
• Kenis P., Janowicz-Panjaitan M., Cambré B.Temporary Organizations: Prevalence, Logic and Effectiveness (2009) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment (1969) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Lewin K. Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations (1947) 1(1):5–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis M. W. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(4):760–776Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindkvist L. Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies. J. Management Governance (2004) 8(1):3–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luhmann N.Risk: A Sociological Theory (Social Institutions and Social Change) (1993) (Aldine de Gruyter, Berlin) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luhmann N.Social Systems (1995) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Lundin R. A., Söderholm A. A theory of the temporary organization. Scand. J. Management (1995) 11(4):437–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lytras M. D., Sicilia M.-A. The knowledge society: A manifesto for knowledge and learning. Internat. J. Knowledge Learn. (2005) 1(1–2):1–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madsen P., Desai V., Roberts K., Wong D. Mitigating hazards through continuing design: The birth and evolution of pediatric intensive care unit. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(2):239–248Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Marengo L. Coordination and organizational learning in the firm. J. Evolutionary Econom (1992) 2(4):313–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C., Mathews J. A., Miles G., Coleman H. J. Organizing in the knowledge age: Anticipating the cellular form. Acad. Management Executive (1997) 11(4):7–24Google Scholar
• Miller D. The architecture of simplicity. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(1):116–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. What happens after success: The perils of excellence. J. Management Stud. (1994) 31(1):325–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner A. S., Bassoff P., Moorman C. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(2):304–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Mom T. J. M., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Understanding variation in managers' ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):812–828Link, Google Scholar
• Neisser U.Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology (1976) (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Res. Organ. Behav. (2008) 28:185–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons T.The Social System (1991) . New preface by B. S. Turner. Routledge, London (Orig. pub. 1951.)Google Scholar
• Pedler M., Burgoyne J., Boydell J.The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development (1991) (McGraw-Hill, London) Google Scholar
• Piaget J.The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures: The Central Problem of Intellectual Development (1985) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Pierson P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (2000) 94(2):251–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piore M. J., Sabel C. F.Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Raisch S., Birkinshaw J., Probst G., Tushman M. L. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):685–695Link, Google Scholar
• Rometsch M., Sydow J., Kornberger M., Gudergan S. On identities of networks and organizations. Only Connect: Neat Words, Networks and Identities (2006) (Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen) 19–47Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos F. M., Eisenhardt K. M. Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):491–508Link, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(2):312–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schreyögg G., Kliesch-Eberl M. How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(9):913–933Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schreyögg G., Noss C. Reframing change in organizations: The equilibrium logic and beyond. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc. (2000) Toronto(Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY) B1–B6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Seidl D.Organisational Identity and Self-Transformation: An Autopoietic Perspective (2005) (Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, UK) Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Rivkin J. W. Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):101–122Link, Google Scholar
• Simsek Z. Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. J. Management Stud. (2009) 46(4):597–624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):522–536Link, Google Scholar
• Staber U., Sydow J. Organizational adaptive capacity: A structuration perspective. J. Management Inquiry (2002) 11(4):408–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starkey K., Barnatt C., Tempest S. Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the U.K. television industry. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(3):299–305Link, Google Scholar
• Sydow J., Schreyögg G., Koch J. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Acad. Management Rev. (2009) 34(4):689–709Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature of microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise advantage. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(13):1319–1350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G., Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Nord W. R. The institutionalization of institutional theory. Handbook of Organization Studies (1996) (Sage Publications, London) 175–190Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H., Chia R. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(5):567–582Link, Google Scholar
• Vaill P. B.Learning as a Way of Being: Strategies for Survival in a World of Permanent White Water (1996) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Organization design: Organizations as self-designing systems. Organ. Dynam. (1977) 6(2):31–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.Making Sense of the Organization (2000) (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
• Wiggins R. R., Ruefli T. W. Schumpeter's ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(10):887–911Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wildavsky A. Information as an organizational problem. J. Management Stud. (1983) 20(1):29–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):981–996Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):991–995Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–351Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Reuer J. J., Singh H. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(6):701–713Link, Google Scholar