Power, Status, and Learning in Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0590

References

  • Anderson C., Galinsky A. D. Power, optimism, and risk-taking. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (2006) 36(4):511–536CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson N. R., West M. A. Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. J. Organ. Behav. (1998) 19(3):235–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C., Ames D. R., Gosling S. D. Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one's status in a group. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2008) 34(1):90–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C., Keltner D., John O. P. Emotional convergence between people over time. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2003) 84(5):1054–1068CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C., Srivastava S., Beer J., Spataro S., Chatman J. Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2006) 91(6):1094–1110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Gruenfeld D., Naquin C., Turner M. E. Group learning in organizations. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 369–411Google Scholar
  • Baer M., Frese M. Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. (2003) 24(1):45–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Webster M., Burke P. J. Expectations, status, and behavior. Contemporary Social Psychological Theories (2006) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 268–300Google Scholar
  • Berger J., Rosenholtz S. J., Zelditch M. Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1980) 6:479–508CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks A. K. Power and the production of knowledge: Collective team learning in work organizations. Human Resource Dev. Quart. (1994) 5(3):213–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S. Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003a) 48(4):557–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Acad. Management J. (2003b) 46(4):458–474CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S., Boumgarden P. Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(3):609–624LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M., Sondak H. Why some teams emphasize learning more than others: Evidence from business unit management teams. Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Toward Phenomenology of Groups and Group Membership (2002) 4(Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK) 49–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen S., Lee-Chai A. Y., Bargh J. A. Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 80(2):173–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen E. G. Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1982) 8:109–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen E. G. Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Rev. Ed. Res. (1994) 64(1):1–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Contu A., Willmott H. Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):283–296LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Copeland J. T. Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 67(2):264–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., Van Kleef G. A. The influence of power on the information search, impression formation, and demands in negotiation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2004) 40(3):303–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Waal F. B. M.Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes (1998) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore) Google Scholar
  • Drea C. M., Wallen K. Low status monkeys “play dumb” when learning in mixed social groups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1999) 96(22):12965–12969CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(2):128–146LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Bohmer R. M., Pisano G. P. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(4):685–716CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Dillon J. R., Roloff K., Walsh J. P., Brief A. P. Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Academy of Management Annals (2007) 1(Routledge, Taylor, & Francis Group, Abingdon, UK) 269–314Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Bourgeois L. J. Politics of strategic decision-making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(4):737–770CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson R. M. Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1962) 27(1):31–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernandez R. M., Gould R. V. A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. Amer. J. Sociol. (1994) 99(6):1455–1491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn F. How much should I help and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(5):539–553CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn F., Reagans R., Amanatullah E., Ames D. Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2006) 91(6):1123–1137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foldy E. G., Rivard P., Buckley T. R. Power, safety, and learning in racially diverse groups. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. (2009) 8(1):25–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky A. D., Gruenfeld D. H., Magee J. C. From power to action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2003) 85(3):453–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky A. D., Magee J. C., Inesi M. E., Gruenfeld D. H. Power and perspectives not taken. Psych. Sci. (2006) 17(12):1068–1074CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky A. D., Magee J. C., Gruenfeld D. H., Whitson J. A., Liljenquist K. A. Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2008) 95(6):1450–1466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruenfeld D. H., Inesi M. E., Magee J. C., Galinsky A. D. Power and the objectification of social targets. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2008) 95(1):111–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guinote A. Power and goal pursuit. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2007) 33(8):1076–1087CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas M. R. Knowledge gathering, team capabilities, and project performance in challenging work environments. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8):1170–1184LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D. A., Klein K. J. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(4):1199–1228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):88–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keltner D. The power paradox. Greater Good (2007) 4:14–17Google Scholar
  • Keltner D., Gruenfeld D. H., Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. (2003) 110(2):265–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keltner D., Van Kleef G. A., Chen S., Kraus M. W. A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2008) 40:151–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lammers J., Gordijn E. H., Otten S. Looking through the eyes of the powerful. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2008) 44(5):1229–1238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lammers J., Galinsky A. D., Gordijn E. H., Otten S. Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psych. Sci. (2008) 19(6):558–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langner C. A., Keltner D. Social power and emotional experience: Actor and partner effects within dyadic interactions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2008) 44(3):848–856CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson J. R., Foster-Fishman P. G., Franz T. M. Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1998) 24(5):482–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence T. B., Mauws M. K., Dyck B. B., Kleysen R. F. The politics of organizational learning: Integrating power into the 4I framework. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):180–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee F. When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 72(3):336–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovaglia M. J. Power and status: Exchange, attribution, and expectation states. Small Group Res. (1995) 26(3):400–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magee J. C., Galinsky A. D., Walsh J. P., Brief A. P. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals (2008) (Routledge, Taylor, & Francis Group, Abingdon, UK) 351–398Google Scholar
  • Magee J. C., Langner C. A. How personalized and socialized power motivation facilitate antisocial and prosocial decision-making. J. Res. Personality (2008) 42(6):1547–1559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magee J. C., Galinsky A. D., Gruenfeld D. H. Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2007) 33(2):200–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClelland D. C.Power: The Inner Experience (1975) (Irvington, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nembhard I. M., Edmondson A. C. Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J. Organ. Behav. (2006) 27:941–966CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orr J. E.Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (1996) (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Overbeck J. R., Park B. When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81(4):549–565CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Overbeck J. R., Park B. Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders' social attention. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2006) 99(2):227–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Power in Organizations (1981) (Pitman, Marshfield, MA) Google Scholar
  • Phillips D. J., Zuckerman E. W. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstrations in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107(2):379–429CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pitcher P., Smith A. D. Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(1):1–18LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pitt W.The Speeches of the Right Honourable the Earl of Chatham in the Houses of Lords and Commons: With a Biographical Memoir and Introductions and Explanatory Notes to the Speeches (1848) (Aylott & Jones, London) Google Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. All in the family: Reply to Burt, Podolny, and van de Rijt, Ban, and Sarkar. Indust. Corporate Change (2008) 17(5):979–999CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. Short-cut to efficiency? The implications of a small-stratified world. (2009) . Working paper, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. Status in groups: The importance of motivation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1982) 47(1):76–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. Nonverbal behavior, dominance, and the basis of status in task groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1987) 52(5):683–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Hogg M. A., Tindale R. S. Social status and group structure. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (2001) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 352–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Johnson C., Diekema D. External status, legitimacy, and compliance in male and female groups. Soc. Forces (1994) 72(4):1051–1077CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roome N., Wijen F. Stakeholder power and organizational learning in corporate environmental management. Organ. Stud. (2006) 27(2):235–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rusbult C. E., Van Lange P. A. M. Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Rev. Psych. (2003) 54:351–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sapolsky R. M. The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science (2005) 308(5722):648–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scheepers D. Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during inter-group competition. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2009) 45(1):228–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Smith P. K., Jostmann N. B., Galinsky A. D., van Dijk W. W. Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psych. Sci. (2008) 19(5):441–447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Thompson L. L., Levine J. M., Messick D. M. The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (1999) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 49–69Google Scholar
  • Thomas-Hunt M. C., Phillips K. W. When what you know is not enough: Expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2004) 30(12):1585–1598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thye S. R., Willer D., Markovsky B. From status to power: New models at the intersection of two theories. Soc. Forces (2006) 84(3):1471–1495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tregaskis O. Learning networks, power and legitimacy in multinational subsidiaries. Internat. J. Human Resource Management (2003) 14(3):431–447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Vegt G. S., Bunderson J. S., Oosterhof A. Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(5):877–893CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Vegt G. S., de Jong S. B., Bunderson J. S., Molleman E. Power asymmetry and learning in teams: The moderating role of performance feedback. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(2):347–361LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Kleef G. A., Oveis C., van der Löwe I., LuoKogan A., Goetz J., Keltner D. Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psych. Sci. (2008) 19(12):1315–1322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker H. A., Thye S. R., Simpson B., Lovaglia M. J., Willer D., Markovsky B. Network exchange theory: Recent developments and new directions. Soc. Psych. Quart. (2000) 63(4):324–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster M., Whitmeyer J. M., Rashotte L. S. Status claims, performance expectations, and inequality in groups. Soc. Sci. Res. (2004) 33(4):724–745CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal J. D., Zajac E. J. Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):60–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willer R. Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2009) 74(1):23–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson J. M., Goodman P. S., Cronin M. A. Group learning. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(4):1041–1059CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittenbaum G. M., Hollingshead A. B., Botero I. C. From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Comm. Monographs (2004) 71(3):286–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong S.-S., Ho V. T., Lee C. H. A power perspective to interunit knowledge transfer: Linking knowledge attributes to unit power and the transfer of knowledge. J. Management (2008) 34(1):127–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhong C., McGee J. C., Maddux W. W., Galinsky A. D., Mannix E. A., Neale M. A., Chen Y. Power, culture, and action: Considerations in the expression and enactment of power in East Asian and Western societies. Research on Managing Groups and Teams (2006) 9(Elsevier Science Press, Greenwich, CT) 53–73Google Scholar
  • Zink C. F., Tong Y., Chen Q., Bassett D. S., Stein J. L., Meyer-Lindenberg A. Know your place: Neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron (2008) 58(2):273–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.