Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Opportunism

References

• Adams J. S., Berkowitz L., Zannna M. P. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1965) 2(Academic Press, New York) 267–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof G. A. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84(3):488–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alchian A. A., Demsetz H. Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1972) 62(5):777–795Google Scholar
• Anderson E. Transaction costs as determinants of opportunism in integrated and independent sales forces. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1988) 9(3):247–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asher C. C., Mahoney J. M., Mahoney J. T. Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. J. Management Governance (2005) 9(1):5–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard C. I.The Functions of the Executive (1966) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L. A., Kraakman R., Triantis G. G., Morck R. K. Stock pyramids, cross-ownership, and dual class equity: The mechanisms and agency costs of separating control from cash-flow rights. Concentrated Corporate Ownership (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 295–315Google Scholar
• Berle A. A., Means G. C.The Modern Corporation and Private Property (1932) (Transaction Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
• Berry L. L., Seiders K. Serving unfair customers. Bus. Horizons (2008) 51(1):29–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beugré C. D., Acar W. Offshoring and cross-border interorganizational relationships: A justice model. Decision Sci. (2008) 39(3):445–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binmore K., Kincaid H., Ross D. Interpersonal comparison of utility. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics (2009) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 540–559Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blair M. M.Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty-First Century (1995) (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Blair M. M., Roe M. J.Employees and Corporate Governance (1999) (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Blair M. M., Stout L. A. A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Rev. (1999) 85(2):247–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bosse D. A., Phillips R. A., Harrison J. S. Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(4):447–456Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowie N. E., Dunfee T. W. Confronting morality in markets. J. Bus. Ethics (2002) 38(4):381–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F.Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (2003) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Carell M. R., Shank M., Barbero J. L. Fairness norms in negotiation: A study of American and European perspectives. Dispute Resolution J. (2009) 64(1):54–61Google Scholar
• Chu W., Gerstner W., Hess J. D. Managing dissatisfaction: How to decrease customer opportunism by partial refunds. J. Service Res. (1998) 1(2):140–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarkson M. B. E. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(1):92–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff R. W. When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(2):119–133Link, Google Scholar
• Colander D. Edgeworth's hedonimeter and the quest to measure utility. J. Econom. Perspect. (2007) 21(1):215–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornell B., Shapiro A. C. Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management (1987) 16(1):5–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosno J. L., Dahlstrom R. A meta-analytic view of opportunism in exchange relationships. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2008) 36(2):191–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R., Gächter S. The science of experimental economics. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2010) 73(1):122–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton C. M., Dalton D. R. Corporate governance best practices: The proof is in the process. J. Bus. Strategy (2006) 27(4):5–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diener E., Seligman M. E. P. Beyond money: Towards an economy of well-being. Psych. Sci. Public Interest (2004) 5(1):1–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson T., Preston L. E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(1):65–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easterbrook F. H., Fischel D. R.The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (1996) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Easterlin R. A.Happiness in Economics (2002) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
• Etzioni A.A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations: On Power, Involvement, and Their Correlates (1961) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Fama E. F., Jensen M. C. Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. (1983) 26(2):301–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Fischbacher U. Why social preferences matter—The impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. Econom. J. (2002) 112(478):C1–C33Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Gächter S. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(3):159–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman R. E.Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Freeman R. E., Wicks A. C., Parmar B. Stakeholder theory and “The corporate objective revisited”. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(3):364–369Link, Google Scholar
• French J. R. P., Raven B. H., Cartwright D. The bases of social power. Studies in Social Power (1959) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor) 150–167Google Scholar
• Frey B. S., Stutzer A. What can economists learn from happiness research? J. Econom. Literature (2002) 40(2):402–435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frooman J. Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(2):191–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbreath J. Building corporate social responsibility into strategy. Eur. Bus. Rev. (2009) 21(2):109–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerstner E., Libai B. Why does poor service prevail? Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):601–603Link, Google Scholar
• Gibbs J. P.Norms, Deviance, and Social Control: Conceptual Matters (1981) (Elsevier, New York) Google Scholar
• Gospel H. F., Pendleton A.Corporate Governance and Labour Management: An International Comparison (2006) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Gouldner A. W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1960) 25(2):161–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Nickerson J. A. Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(5):688–708Link, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Werder A. v., Zajac E. J. New directions in corporate governance research. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(3):381–385Link, Google Scholar
• Hart O. D. Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1988) 4(1):119–139Google Scholar
• Hart O. D., Holmström B. R., Bewly T. F. The theory of contracts. Advances in Economic Theory: Fifth World Congress (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 71–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O. D., Moore J. Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrica (1988) 56(4):755–785Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heery E., Wood S. Employment relations and corporate governance. British J. Indust. Relations (2003) 41(3):477–479Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heide J. B., John G. Do norms matter in marketing relationships? J. Marketing (1992) 56(2):32–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans G. C. Social behavior as exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. (1958) 63(6):597–606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ivens B. S., Blois K. J. Relational exchange norms in marketing: A critical review of Macneil's contribution. Marketing Theory (2004) 4(3):239–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson G. Stakeholders under pressure: Corporate governance and labour management in Germany and Japan. Corporate Governance: Internat. Rev. (2005) 13(3):419–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3(4):305–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• John G. An empirical investigation of some antecedents of opportunism in a marketing channel. J. Marketing Res. (1984) 21(3):278–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson S., La Porta R., López-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Tunneling. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. (2000) 90(2):22–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joskow P. L. Asset specificity and the structure of vertical relationships. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1988) 4(1):95–117Google Scholar
• Kagel J. H., Roth A. E.The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keasey K., Thompson S., Wright M., Keasey K., Thompson S., Wright M. Introduction: The corporate governance problem—Competing diagnoses and solutions. Corporate Governance: Economic and Financial Issues (1997) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 1–17Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Kochan T. A., Rubinstein S. A. Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):367–386Link, Google Scholar
• Macaulay S. Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1963) 28(1):55–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackey A., Mackey T. B., Barney J. B. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(3):817–835Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney J. T., McGahan A. M., Pitelis C. N. The interdependence of private and public interests. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(6):1034–1052Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Matten D., Crane A. Corporate citizenship: Towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):166–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maxfield S. Reconciling corporate citizenship and competitive strategy: Insights from economic theory. J. Bus. Ethics (2008) 80(2):367–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell R. K., Agle B. R., Wood D. J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):853–886Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moch M., Seashore S. E., Nystrom P. C., Starbuck W. H. How norms affect behaviours in and of corporations. Handbook of Organizational Design (1981) (Oxford University Press, New York) 210–237Google Scholar
• Monks R. A. G., Minow N.Corporate Governance (2001) 2nd ed.(Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Nagin D. S., Rebitzer J. B., Sanders S., Taylor L. J. Monitoring, motivation, and management: The determinants of opportunistic behavior in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(4):850–873Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson W. R. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(4):1180–1183Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan M.Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Peterson R. A., Ferrell O. C.Business Ethics: New Challenges for Business Schools and Corporate Leaders (2004) (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (2003) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Pirson M.Facing the Trust Gap—Measuring and Managing Stakeholder Trust (2008) (SVH, Saarbrücken, Germany) Google Scholar
• Pirson M., Malhotra D. Unconventional insights for managing stakeholder trust. Sloan Management Rev. (2008) 49(4):42–50Google Scholar
• Pirson M., Malhotra D. Foundations of stakeholder trust: What matters to different stakeholders? Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(4):1087–1104Link, Google Scholar
• Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993) 83(5):1281–1302Google Scholar
• Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(1):90–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A., Vishny R. A survey of corporate governance. J. Finance (1997) 52(2):737–783Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. A comparison of organization theories. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1952) 20(1):40–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundaram A. K., Inkpen A. C. The corporate objective revisited. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(3):350–363Link, Google Scholar
• Sutton-Brady C., Håkansson H., Solberg C. A., Huemer L., Steigum L. Relationship atmosphere—The final chapter. Interactions, Relationships and Networks: Strategic Dimensions: Proceedings of the 17th IMP Conference (2001) Oslo, Norway:1–13Google Scholar
• Terlep S., Rauwald C. GM withdraws state-aid requests for Opel. Wall Street Journal (2010) June 17):B1Google Scholar
• Van Ees H., Gabrielsson J., Huse M. Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: Internat. Rev. (2009) 17(3):307–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Praag B. M. S., Ferrer-i-Carbonell A.Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach (2008) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Velasquez M. G.Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (2006) 6th ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Vining A. R., Weimer D. L. Information asymmetry favoring sellers: A policy framework. Policy Sci. (1988) 21(4):281–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• v. Wangenheim F., Bayón T. Behavioral consequences of overbooking service capacity. J. Marketing (2007) 71(4):36–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• v. Werder A. Modernisierung der Mitbestimmung. Die Betriebswirtschaft (2004) 64(2):229–243Google Scholar
• v. Werder A., Hommelhoff P., Hopt K. J., v. Werder A. Ökonomische Grundfragen der Corporate Governance. Handbuch Corporate Governance: Leitung und Überwachung börsennotierter Unternehmen in der Rechts- und Wirtschaftspraxis (2009) 2nd ed.(Schäffer Poeschel, Stuttgart, Germany) 3–37Google Scholar
• Warren D. E. Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(4):622–632Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warren D. I. Power, visibility, and conformity in formal organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1968) 33(6):951–970Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Wirtz J., Kum D. Consumer cheating on service guarantees. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2004) 32(2):159–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolfe R. A., Putler D. S. How tight are the ties that bind stakeholder groups? Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(1):64–80Link, Google Scholar
• Zajac E. J.Political Economy of Fairness (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Zajac E. J., Westphal J. D., Hambrick D. C., Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L. Toward a behavioral theory of the CEO–board relationship: How research can enhance our understanding of corporate governance practices. Navigating Change: How CEOs, Top Teams, and Boards Steer Transformation (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) 256–277Google Scholar
• Zingales L., Newman P. Corporate governance. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law (1998) (Palgrave Macmillan, London) 497–503Google Scholar