Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0621

References

  • Adler P. S., Clark K. B. Behind the learning curve: A sketch of the learning process. Management Sci. (1991) 37(3):267–281LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G., Katila R. Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(8–9):887–907CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alcácer J., Gittleman M. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(4):774–779CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almedia P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile T. M. Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. Calif. Management Rev. (1997) 40(1):39–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile T. M., Barsade S. G., Mueller J. S., Staw B. M. Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(3):367–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Kozlowski S. Organizational learning and knowledge management. Oxford Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Epple D. Learning curves in manufacturing. Science (1990) 247(4945):920–924CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):150–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Ophir R., Baum J. A. C. Intraorganizational learning. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 181–207Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Todorova G., Hodgkinson G. P., Ford J. K. Organizational learning: Review and future directions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2007) 22(John Wiley & Sons, New York) 193–234Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):140–154LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Gruenfeld D. H., Naquin C., Turner M. E. Group learning in organizations. Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 369–411Google Scholar
  • Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C.Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning (1990) (Allyn & Bacon, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Argyris C., Schön D. A.Organizational Learning (1978) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Arrow H., McGrath J. E., Berdahl J. L.Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation (2000) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Ashworth M., Mukhopadhyay T., Argote L. Information technology and organizational learning: An empirical analysis. Proc. 25th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) (2004) (International Conference on Information Systems, Washington, DC) 11–21Google Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Goncalo J. A. Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. (2007) 52(1):1–15LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Austin J. R. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effect of content, consensus, specialization and accuracy on group performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):866–878CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A.Social Learning Theory (1977) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):996–1016LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baer M., Oldham G. R., Jacobsohn G. C., Hollingshead A. B. The personality composition of teams and creativity: The moderating role of team creative confidence. J. Creative Behav. (2008) 42(4):255–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):312–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Making organizational theory work: Institutions, occupations, and negotiated orders. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1157–1167LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Burton M. D. Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(1):3–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benkard C. L. Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):1034–1054CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benner M. J., Tushman M. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):238–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besanko D., Doraszelski U., Kryukov Y., Satterthwaite M. Learning-by-doing, organizational forgetting, and industry dynamics. Econometrica (2010) 78(2):453–508CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnholtz J. P., Cohen M. D., Hoch S. V. Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):315–332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boh W. F., Slaughter S. A., Espinosa J. A. Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1315–1331LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bohn R. E. Noise and learning in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(1):31–42LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boland R. J., Tenkasi R. V., Te'eni D. Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(3):456–475LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brandon D. P., Hollingshead A. B. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):633–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bresman H. External learning activities and team performance: A multimethod field study. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(1):81–96LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(1):37–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):40–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S., Boumgarden P. Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(3):609–624LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S., Reagans R. E. Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1182–1194LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(3):552–560CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K. Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):20–46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):555–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R., Rebentisch E. S. Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. (2003) 49(9):1180–1195LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carrillo J. E., Gaimon C. Improving manufacturing performance through process change and knowledge creation. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):265–288LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Bigelow L. S., Seidel M. L., Tsai L. B. The fates of the de novo and de alio producers in American automobile industry: 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Special issue):117–137Google Scholar
  • Cattani G. Preadaptation, firm heterogeneity, and technological performance: A study on the evolution of fiber optics, 1970–1995. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):563–580LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W.-R. Determinants of firms' backward- and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(4):609–622LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., Bacdayan P. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(4):554–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M., Sproull L. Special issue on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):1–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Contu A., Willmott H. Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relationships in learning theory. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):283–296LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cook S. D. N., Brown J. S. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):381–400LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cross R., Sproull L. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):446–462LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crossan M. M., Lane H. W., White R. E. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):522–537CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):352–364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall/Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Darr E. D., Kurztberg T. R. An investigation of partner similarity dimensions of knowledge transfer. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):28–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darr E. D., Argote L., Epple D. The acquisition, transfer and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. (1995) 41(11):1750–1762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport T. H., Prusak L.Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Davis M. A. Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2009) 108(1):25–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., Baas M., Nijstad B. A. Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood–creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2008) 94(5):739–756CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Holan P. M., Philips N. Remembrance of things past: The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Sci. (2004) 50(1):1603–1613LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dencker J. C., Gruber M., Shah S. K. Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(3):516–537LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J., March J. G. Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):523–538LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J., Fang C., Levinthal D. A. From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning from model-based feedback. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1366–1378LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dierkis M., Antal A. B., Child J., Nonaka I.Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (2001) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Dutton J. M., Thomas A. Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):235–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A.The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (2003) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Easterby-Smith M., Crossan M., Niccolini D. Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. J. Management Stud. (2000) 37(6):783–796CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Dillon J. R., Roloff K. S. Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Acad. Management Ann. (2007) 1:269–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Winslow A., Bohmer R., Pisano G. Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sci. (2003) 34(2):197–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberger R., Rhoades L. Incremental effects of reward on creativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81(4):728–741CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellis S., Davidi I. After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. J. Appl. Psych. (2005) 90(5):857–871CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epple D., Argote L., Devadas R. Organizational learning curves: A method for investigating intra-plant transfer of knowledge acquired through learning by doing. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):58–70LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fang C., Lee J., Schilling M. A. Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(3):625–642LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S., Jarvenpaa S. L., Majchrzak A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1224–1239LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(3):295–309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol C. M., Lyles M. A. Organizational learning. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(4):803–813CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss P. C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(4):1180–1198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fong C. T. The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(5):1016–1030CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman R. S., Forster J. The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81(6):101–1013Google Scholar
  • Garvin D. A.Learning in Action: A Guide to Putting the Learning Organization to Work (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D. E. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):113–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gentner D. Structured mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Sci. (1983) 7(2):155–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George J. M. Creativity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. (2007) 1:439–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George J. M., King E. B., Mannix E. A., Neale M. A., Anderson C. P. Potential pitfalls of affect convergence in teams: Functions and dysfunctions of group affective tone. Affect and Groups. Research on Managing Groups and Teams (2007) 10(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 97–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George J. M., Zhou J. Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(3):605–622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gherardi S.Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning (2006) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gibson C. B., Gibbs J. L. Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2006) 51(3):451–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gick M. L., Holyoak K. J. Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psych. (1983) 15(1):1–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F., Argote L., Miron-Spektor E., Todorova G. First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2010) 111(2):93–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittleman M. Does geography matter for science-based firms? Epistemic communities and the geography of research and patenting in biotechnology. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(4):724–741LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glynn M. A., Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Stubbart C., Meindl J. R., Porac J. F. A. Mapping learning processes in organizations: A multi-level framework for linking learning and organizing. Adances in Managerial Cognition and Organizational Information Processing (1994) 5(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 43–83Google Scholar
  • Grandori A., Kogut B. Dialogue on organization and knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):224–231LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grawitch M. J., Munz D. C., Kramer T. J. Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Res. Practice (2003) 7(1):41–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R.Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(5):397–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):693–706CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Tesluk P. E., Taylor M. S. Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):885–897LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haas M. R., Hansen M. T. When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. (2004) 26(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haleblian J., Finkelstein S. The influence of organization acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning theory perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):29–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Fanelli A. Action and possibility: Reconciling duel perspectives of knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):290–302LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R., Sullivan B. N. Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines' learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(4):609–643CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayward M. L. A. When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990–1995. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(1):21–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Raubitchek R. S. Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):961–979CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herriott S. R., Levinthal D., March J. G. Learning from experience in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(2):298–302Google Scholar
  • Higgins E. T. Beyond pleasure and pain. Amer. Psych. (1997) 52(12):1280–1300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirst G., Knippenberg D. V., Zhou J. A cross-level, perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Acad. Management J. (2009) 52(2):280–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hodgkinson G. P., Sparrow P. R.The Competent Organization: A Psychological Analysis of the Strategic Management Process (2002) (Open University Press, Buckingham, UK) Google Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. Group and individual training: The impact of practice on performance. Small Group Res. (1998) 29(2):254–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):88–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huff A. S., Jenkins M.Mapping Strategic Knowledge (2002) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hülsheger U. R., Anderson N., Salgado J. F. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J. Appl. Psych (2009) 94(5):1128–1145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchins E., Resnick L. B., Levine J. M., Teasley S. D. The social organization of distributed cognition. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (1991) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 283–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P., Baum J. A. C. Interorganizational learning. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 642–663Google Scholar
  • Ingram P., Baum J. A. C. Opportunity and constraint: Organizations' learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Summer):75–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(3):577–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen R. J., Szulanski G. Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2007) 53(11):1716–1730LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kanawattanachai P., Yoo Y. The impact of coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):783–808Google Scholar
  • Kane A. A. Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: Knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(3):643–660LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kane A. A., Argote L., Levine J. M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personal rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96(1):56–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kane G. C., Alavi M. Information technology and organizational learning: An investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):796–812LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kark R., Van Dijk D. Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self regulatory focus in leadership processes. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(2):500–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(6):1183–1194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim P. H. When what you know can hurt you: A study of experiential effects on group discussion and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 69(2):165–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J.-Y., Kim J.-Y., Miner A. S. Organizational learning from extreme performance experience: The impact of success and recovery experience. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(6):958–978LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S., Sleeper S. Entry by spinoffs. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1291–1306LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knott A. M. The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Sci. (2001) 47(3):430–448LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen T., Levinthal D. A. Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):39–54LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):502–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lampel J., Shamsie J., Shapira Z. Experiencing the improbable: Rare events and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(5):835–845LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K. Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. (1992) 38(5):623–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré M. A., Mukherjee A. S., Van Wassenhove L. N. Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):597–611LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laughlin P. R., Ellis A. L. Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1986) 22(3):177–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D., Miller S. Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(4):623–646LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levin D. Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1477–1490LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levin D. Z., Kurtzberg T. R., Phillips K. W., Lount R. B. The role of affect in knowledge transfer. Group Dynamics (2010) 14(2):123–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D., March J. G. A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1981) 2(4):307–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D., Rerup C. Bridging mindful and less mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):502–513LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K., Lange D., Gillis L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):581–598LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K., Belliveau M., Herndon B., Keller J. Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2007) 103(2):159–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory system. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21(4):384–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipshitz R., Freedman V. J., Popper M.Demystifying Organizational Learning (2007) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Madsen P. M., Desai V. M. Failing to learn? The effect of failure and successes on organizational learning the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad. Management J. (2010) 53(3):451–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Cooper L. P., Neece O. E. Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management. Sci. (2004) 50(2):174–188LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Jarvenpaa S. L., Hollingshead A. B. Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):147–161LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mansfield E. How rapidly does new industrial technology leak out? J. Indust. Econom. (1985) 34(2):217–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G.The Ambiguities of Experience (2010) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Sproull L. S., Tamuz M. Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):1–14LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer K. J., Argyres N. S. Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):394–410LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McFadyen M. A., Semadeni M., Cannella A. A. Value of strong ties to disconnected others: Examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(3):552–564LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath R. G. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):118–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath J. E., Argote L., Hogg M. A., Scott Tindale R. Group processes in organizational contexts. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (2001) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 603–627CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. J., Fern M. J., Cardinal L. B. The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(2):308–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Haunschild P. R. Population-level learning. Res. Organ. Behav. (1995) 17:115–166Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Mezias S. J. Ugly duckling no more: Past and futures of organizational learning research. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(1):88–99LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miron E., Erez M., Naveh E. Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? J. Organ. Behav. (2004) 25(2):175–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miron-Spektor E., Erez M., Naveh E. The effect of conformists and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Acad. Management J. (2011) . ePub ahead of print, http://journals.aomonline.org/InPress/pdf/done/885.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Miron-Spektor E., Gino F., Argote L. The effect of paradoxical cognition on individual and team innovation. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc. (2008) (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY) 1–6Google Scholar
  • Moorman C., Miner A. S. The impact of organizational memory in new product performance and creativity. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):91–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris M. W., Moore P. C. The lessons we (don't) learn: Counterfactual thinking and organizational accountability after close call. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(4):737–765CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naveh E., Erez M. Innovation and attention-to-detail in the quality improvement paradigm. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1576–1586LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belkman Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Nohria N., Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(5):1245–1264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovations (1995) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Nonaka I., von Krogh G. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(3):635–652LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(S1):187–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W. Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1286–1296LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):249–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Osterloh M., Frey B. S. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):538–550LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(1):5–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pearsall M. J., Ellis A. P. J., Stein J. H. Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2009) 109(1):18–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J. E. Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(1):85–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J. E., Shalley C. E. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(1):89–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G. P. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(S1):85–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G. P., Bohmer R. M. J., Edmondson A. C. Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2001) 47(6):752–768LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M.Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (1962) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Quigley N. R., Tesluk P. E., Locke E. A., Bartol K. M. A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):71–88LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raisch S., Birkinshaw J. B., Probst G., Tushman M. L. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):685–695LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rao R. D., Argote L. Organizational learning and forgetting: The effects of turnover and structure. Eur. Management Rev. (2006) 3(2):77–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Argote L., Brooks D. Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing what to do and knowing who knows what. Management Sci. (2005) 51(6):869–881LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ren Y., Carley K. M., Argote L. The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):671–682LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Repenning N. P., Sterman J. D. Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(2):265–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C., Feldman M. S. Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. (2011) 54(3):577–610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rietzschel E. F., Nijstad B. A., Stroebe W. Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2007) 43(6):933–946CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):274–293LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roese N. J., Olson J. M. Outcomes controllability and counterfactual thinking. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21(6):620–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Almedia P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):751–765LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., McGrath P. Advancing the conceptualization and operationalization of novelty in organizational research. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1297–1311LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Vidal P., Ployhart R.E., Marangoni A. Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and organizational learning. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):39–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz M., Baum J. A. C. Organizational Learning. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell Business, Oxford, UK) 415–441Google Scholar
  • Schwab A. Incremental organizational learning from multilevel information sources: Evidence for cross-level interactions. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):233–251LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Senge P. M.The Fifth Discipline: Art and Practice of the Learning Organizations (1990) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Senior C., Lee N., Butler M. Perspective: Organizational cognitive neuroscience. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(3):804–815LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):448–469LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw J. D., Duffy M. K., Johnson J. L., Lockhart D. E. Turnover, social capital losses, and performance. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(4):594–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shiffrin R. M., Schneider M. W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84(2):127–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sidhu J. S., Commandeur H. R., Volberda H. W. The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):20–38LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singley M. K., Anderson J. R.The Transfer of Cognitive Skill (1989) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Res. Organ. Behav. (1992) 14:231–266Google Scholar
  • Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H., Holloway S.Managing Learning and Knowledge. Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (2008) 1(Edward Elgar Publishing, Chelstenham, UK) Google Scholar
  • Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter special issue):27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tallman S., Phene A. Leveraging knowledge across geographic boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):252–260LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor A., Greve H. R. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):723–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson P. How much did the Liberty shipbuilders forget? Management Sci. (2007) 53(6):908–918LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ton Z., Huckman R. S. Managing the impact of employee turnover on performance: The role of process conformance. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(1):56–68LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tortoriello M., Krackhardt D. Activating cross-boundary knowledge: the role of simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. (2010) 53(1):167–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H. A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(6):941–957LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1147–1161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker A. L. An empirical study of system improvement by frontline employees in hospital units. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(4):492–505LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vaast E., Levina N. Multiple faces of codification: Organizational redesign in an IT organization. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(2):190–201LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Vegt G. S., de Jong S. B., Bunderson J. S., Molleman E. Asymmetry and learning in teams: The moderating role of performance feedback. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(2):347–361LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vanneste B. S., Puranam P. Repeated interactions and contractual detail: Identifying the learning effect. Organ. Sci. (2011) 21(1):186–201LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh J. P., Ungson G. R. Organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):57–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber R. A., Camerer C. F. Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):400–415LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Mullen B., Goethals G. R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–205Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Roberts K. H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):357–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):514–524LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weigelt C., Sarkar M. Learning from supply-side agents: The impact of technology solution providers' experiential diversity on clients' innovation adoption. Acad. Management J. (2009) 52(1):37–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams C. Transfer in context: Replication and adaptation in knowledge transfer relationships. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(9):867–889CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson J. M., Goodman P. S., Cronin M. A. Group learning. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(4):1041–1059CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong S.-S. Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):645–656LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):76–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Z. X., Hempel P. S., Ham Y. L., Tjosvold D. Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92(6):1722–1730CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Reuer J. J. Experience spillovers across corporate development activities. Organ. Sci (2010) 21(6):1195–1212LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–351LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.