Using Organizational Economics to Study Organizational Capability Development and Strategy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0625

References

  • Abell P., Felin T., Foss N. Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial Decision Econom. (2008) 29(6):489–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvarez S. A., Barney J. B. The entrepreneurial theory of the firm. J. Management Stud. (2007) 44(7):1057–1063CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand B., Khanna T. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):295–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arend R. Tests of the resource-based view: Do the empirics have any clothes? Strategic Organ. (2006) 4(4):409–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Miron-Spektor E. Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1123–1137LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S. Evidence on the role of capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(2):129–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S., Liebeskind J. P. Governance inseparability and the evolution of the US biotechnology industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2002) 47(2):197–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S., Mui V.-L. Rules of engagement, credibility and the political economy of organizational dissent. Strategic Organ. (2007) 5(2):107–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S., Zenger T. Capabilities, transaction costs and firm boundaries: A dynamic perspective and integration. (2010) . Working paper, Olin School of Business, Washington University in St. Louis, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S., Bercovitz J., Mayer K. J. Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: An empirical study of IT services contracts. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):3–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armour H. O., Teece D. J. Organizational structure and economic performance: A test of the multidivisional hypothesis. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9(1):106–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P., Shane S. Entrepreneurs, contracts, and the failure of young firms. Management Sci. (2001) 47(3):337–358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Chandler A. D.Scale and Scope (1990) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conner K. R., Prahalad C. K. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):477–501LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford V. P., Sobel J. Strategic information transmission. Econometrica (1982) 50(6):1431–1451CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz H. The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1988) 4(1):141–161Google Scholar
  • Felin T., Foss N. J. Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organ. (2005) 3(4):441–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N. J. Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):470–476LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gebert D., Boerner S., Kearney E. Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies? Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(3):593–608LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghosh M., John G. Governance value analysis and marketing strategy. J. Marketing (1999) 63:131–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghoshal S., Moran P. Bad for practice: A critique of transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(1):13–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grove A. S.Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points That Challenge Every Company (1993) (Currency Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M., Singh H., Teece D., Winter S. G.Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (2007) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
  • Jacobides M. G., Winter S. G. The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(5):395–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P., Dyer J., Singh H. Alliance capability, stock market response and long-term alliance success: The role of alliance function. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(8):747–767CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P., Singh H., Perlmutter H. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):217–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J., Mahoney J. T. Property rights theory, transaction costs theory, and agency theory: An organizational economics approach to strategic management. Managerial Decision Econom. (2005) 26(4):223–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lacatera N., Cockburn I., Henderson R., Baum J. A. C., McGahan A. M. Do firms change their capabilities by hiring new people? A study of the adoption of science-driven drug research. Business Strategy Over the Industry Life Cycle. Advances in Strategic Management (2004) 21(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 133–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langlois R. N. Transaction-cost economics in real time. Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1(1):99–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leiblein M. J., Reuer J. J., Dalsace F. Do make or buy decisions matter? The influence of organizational governance on technological performance. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(9):817–833CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macher J. T., Richman B. D. Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics (2008) 10(1):1–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer K. J., Argyres N. S. Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):394–410LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P. R., Roberts J. Relying on the information from interested parties. RAND J. Econom. (1986) 17(1):18–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Silverman B. S. Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(3):433–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(13):1429–1449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Hamilton B. H., Wada T. Market position, resource profile, and governance: Linking Porter and Williamson in the context of international courier and small package services in Japan. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(3):251–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., von Krogh G. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(3):635–652LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L., Zenger T. Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in IT services. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(9):853–877CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prendergast C. The role of promotion in inducing specific human capital acquisition. Quart. J. Econom. (1993a) 108(2):523–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prendergast C. A theory of “yes men”. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993b) 83(4):757–770Google Scholar
  • Priem R. L., Butler J. E. Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(1):22–40Google Scholar
  • Postrel S., Rumelt R. P. Incentives, routines, and self-command. Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1(3):397–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rotemberg J. J., Saloner G. Benefits of narrow business strategies. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 84(5):1330–1349Google Scholar
  • Sampson R. C. The cost of misaligned governance in R&D alliances. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (2004) 20(2):484–526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S. A.A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual–Opportunity Nexus (2003) (Edward Elgar, London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steer P., Cable J. Internal organization and profit: An empirical analysis of large U.K. companies. J. Indust. Econom. (1978) 27(1):13–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Internal organization and economic performance: An empirical analysis of the profitability of principal firms. J. Indust. Econom. (1981) 30(2):173–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H. A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(6):941–957LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vanneste B. S., Puranam P. Repeated interactions and contractual detail: Identifying the learning effect. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(1):186–201LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(S2):75–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Mechanisms of Governance (1996) (Free Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(12):1087–1108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajac E. J., Olson C. P. From transaction cost to transaction value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. J. Management Stud. (1993) 30(1):131–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.