“I've Got a Theory Paper—Do You?”: Conceptual, Empirical, and Theoretical Contributions to Knowledge in the Organizational Sciences

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0636

References

  • Argyres N. S. The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(2):162–180LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Atkinson J. W. Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psych. Rev. (1957) 64(6):359–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. Science and scrutiny: The work and culture of a crime lab. (2011) . Working paper, University of California, Davis, DavisGoogle Scholar
  • Bruner J.Acts of Meaning (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Burton R. M., Obel B. Computational modeling for what-is, what-might-be, and what-should-be studies—And triangulation. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1195–1202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Corley K. G., Gioia D. A. Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. (2011) 36(1):12–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Darwin C.On the Origin of Species (1859) (John Murray, London) . [Reprinted 1964, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.]Google Scholar
  • Dawkins R.The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution (2009) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dyson F. W., Eddington A. S., Davidson C. A determination of the deflection of light by the sun's gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of May 29, 1919. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London (1920) 220A:291–333Google Scholar
  • Elberse A. The power of stars: Do star actors drive the success of movies? J. Marketing (2007) 71(October):102–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fader P. S., McAlister L. An elimination by aspects model of consumer response to promotion calibrated on UPC scanner data. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(3):322–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Orlikowski W. J. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1240–1253LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R., Dunbar R. L. M., Bartel C. A. Dealing with unusual experiences: A narrative perspective on organizational learning. Organ. Sci (2011) 22(3):587–601LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grice H.Studies in the Way of Words (1989) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Guttman L. An outline of a new methodology in social research. Public Opinion Quart. (1954) 18(4):395–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C. The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(6):1346–1352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris R. J. The uncertain connection between verbal theories and research hypotheses in social psychology. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1976) 12(2):210–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakatos I.Mathematics, Science and Epistemology (1978) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lampel J., Shamsie J. Critical push: Strategies for creating momentum in the motion picture industry. J. Management (2000) 26(2):233–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin K.Field Theory in Social Sciences (1952) (Tavistock, London) Google Scholar
  • Livio M.Is God a Mathematician? (2009) (Simon & Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
  • Locke E. A. Toward a theory of task motivation and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1968) 3(2):157–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G.The Ambiguities of Experience (2010) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Meehl P. E. Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philos. Sci. (1967) 34(2):103–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell A., Simon H.Human Problem Solving (1972) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Platt J. R. Strong inference. Science (1964) 146(3642):347–353CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Popper K. R.The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1959) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ravid S. A. Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. J. Bus. (1999) 72(4):463–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regnier E., Harr P. A. A dynamic decision model applied to hurricane landfall. Weather Forecasting (2006) 21(5):764–780CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seshadri S., Shapira Z. Managerial allocation of time and effort: The effects of interruptions. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):647–662LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira Z. Expectancy determinants of intrinsically motivated behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 34(6):1235–1244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira Z. Task choice and assigned goals as determinants of task motivation and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1989) 44(2):141–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira Z., Zevulun E. On the use of facet analysis in organizational behavior research: Some conceptual considerations and an example. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1979) 23(3):411–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver J. M. Organizational significance. Strategic Organ. (2008) 6(2):185–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior (1947) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1981) 2nd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Taylor F. W.The Principles of Scientific Management (1911) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. (1972) 79(4):143–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H. R.Intermediate Microeconomics (1992) (Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Wason P. C. Reasoning about a rule. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. (1968) 20(3):273–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zbaracki M., Ritson M., Levy D., Dutta S., Bergen M. Managerial and customer costs of price adjustment: Direct evidence from industrial markets. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2004) 86(2):514–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.