On Network Theory

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641

References

  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Anklam P.Net Work: A Practical Guide to Creating and Sustaining Networks at Work and in the World (2007) (Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA) Google Scholar
  • Atkin R. H. From cohomology in physics to q-connectivity in social science. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1972) 4(2):139–167CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W.Achieving Success Through Social Capital: Tapping the Hidden Resources in Your Personal and Business Networks (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Bonabeau E., Krebs V. Model behavior. Optimize (2002) 12):1–3Google Scholar
  • Bonacich P. Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(5):1170–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonacich P. Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Soc. Networks (2007) 29(4):555–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P. Centrality and network flow. Soc. Networks (2005) 27(1):55–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Foster P. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management (2003) 29(6):991–1013Google Scholar
  • Brass D. J. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(4):518–539CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D. J. Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28(2):327–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D. J. Social networks in organizations: Antecedents and consequences. (2002) . Unpublished manuscript, University of Kentucky, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D. J., Butterfield K. D., Skaggs B. C. Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(1):14–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Positions in networks. Soc. Forces (1976) 55(1):93–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Bridge decay. Soc. Networks (2002) 24(4):333–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook K. S., Emerson R. M. Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1978) 43:721–739CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooley C. H.Social Organization: A Study of the Larger Mind (1909) (Shocken Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cross R. L., Parker A., Borgatti S. P. A birds-eye view: Using social network analysis to improve knowledge creation and sharing. Knowledge Directions (2000) 2(1):48–61Google Scholar
  • Davis G. F. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(4):583–613CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. L., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubini P., Aldrich H. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. J. Bus. Venturing (1991) 6(5):305–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ebers M., Ebers M. Explaining inter-organizational network formation. The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks (1997) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 3–40Google Scholar
  • Erickson B., Berkowitz S. D., Wellman B. The relational basis of attitudes. Social Structures: A Network Approach (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 99–121Google Scholar
  • Everett M. G., Borgatti S. P. Regular equivalence: General theory. J. Math. Sociol. (1994) 19(1):29–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman L. C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1(3):215–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S.Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers (1974) (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Halgin D. The effects of social identity, network connectivity, and prior performance on career progression and resilience: A study of NCAA basketball coaches. (2009) . UMI Proquest Doctoral Dissertation 3344938, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Homans G. C.The Human Group (1950) (Harcourt-Brace, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ibarra H. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(3):422–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C., Hesterly W. S., Borgatti S. P. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Management J. (1997) 22(4):911–945Google Scholar
  • Kahler M., Kahler M. Collective action and clandestine networks: The case of Al Qaeda. Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance (2009) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) 103–126Google Scholar
  • Kilduff M. Serendipity vs. strategy: A tale of two theories. (2010) Presentation, Intra-Organizational Networks ConferenceApril 10University of Kentucky, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M., Krackhardt D. Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(1):87–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Porter L. W. When friends leave: A structural analysis of relationship between turnover and stayers' attitudes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30(2):242–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Porter L. W. The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication networks. Appl. Psych. (1986) 71(1):50–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakatos I.The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers (1980) 1(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Laumann E. O., Marsden P. V., Prensky D., Burt R. S., Minor M. J. The boundary specification problem in network analysis. Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction (1983) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 18–34Google Scholar
  • Lave C. A., March J. G.An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences (1975) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lazarsfeld P., Merton R. K., Berger M., Abel T., Page C. H. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (1954) (Van Nostrand, New York) 18–66Google Scholar
  • Lee J. Heterogeneity, brokerage, and innovative performance: Endogenous formation of collaborative inventor networks. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(4):804–822LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin N., Marsden P., Lin N. Social resources and instrumental action. Social Structure and Network Analysis (1982) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 131–145Google Scholar
  • Linton R.The Study of Man (1936) (D. Appleton-Century, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lorrain F., White H. C. The structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. J. Math. Sociol. (1971) 1(1):49–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luce R. D. Connectivity and generalized cliques in sociometric group structure. Psychometrika (1950) 15(2):169–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luce R., Perry A. A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika (1949) 14(2):95–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madahaven R. Intra-organizational and inter-organizational network effects: Using meta-analysis to illuminate distinctive mechanisms. (2010) Presentation, Intra-Organizational Networks ConferenceApril 10University of Kentucky, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  • Markovsky B., Willer D., Patton T. Power relations in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1988) 53(2):220–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V. Restricted access in networks and models of power. Amer. J. Sociol. (1983) 88(4):686–717CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson J. M., Smith-Lovin L. Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1987) 52(3):370–379CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson J. M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Soc. (2001) 27:415–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton R. K.Social Theory and Social Structure (1959) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nadel S. F.Theory of Social Structure (1957) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(1):100–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J. E. Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(1):85–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107(1):22–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Baron J. N. Resources and relationship: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. Amer. J. Sociol. (1997) 62(5):673–693CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Staw B., Cummings L. L. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior (1990) 12(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 295–336Google Scholar
  • Rapoport A., Luce R. D., Bush R. R., Galanter E. Mathematical models of social interaction. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology (1963) 2(John Wiley & Sons, New York) 493–579Google Scholar
  • Salancik G. R. WANTED: A good network theory of organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):345–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seidman S. B., Foster B. L. A graph theoretic generalization of the clique concept. J. Math. Sociol. (1978) 6(1):139–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sparrowe R. T., Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., Kraimer M. L. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):316–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tönnies F.Gemeinschaft Und Gesellschaft (1912) 2nd ed.(Fues's Verlag, Leipzig) . [Orig. pub. 1887.]Google Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White D. R., Reitz K. P. Graph and semigroup homomorphisms on networks of relations. Soc. Networks (1983) 5(2):193–234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.