How Managers Use Multiple Media: Discrepant Events, Power, and Timing in Redundant Communication

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0638

References

  • Anderson M. H., Nichols M. L. (2007) Information gathering and changes in threat and opportunity perceptions. J. Management Stud. 44(3) 367–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Meyerson D. E., Grodal S. (2011) E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organ. Sci. 22(4) 887–906.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bartunek J. M., Krim R. M., Necochea R., Humphries M. (1999) Sensemaking, sensegiving, and leadership in strategic organizational development. , Wagner J. A., ed. Advances in Qualitative Organization Research, Vol. 2. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 37–71.Google Scholar
  • Becker H. S. (1996) The epistemology of qualitative research. , Jessor R., Colby A., Schweder R., eds. Essays on Ethnography and Human Development. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) , 53–71.Google Scholar
  • Bélanger F., Watson-Manheim M. B. (2006) Virtual teams and multiple media: Structuring media use to attain strategic goals. Group Decision Negotiation 15(4) 299–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belbin R. M. (2001) Managing Without Power. (Butterworth-Heinemann, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Cameron A. F., Webster J. (2005) Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant messaging in the workplace. Comput. Human Behav. 21(1) 85–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chudoba K. M., Watson-Manheim M. B., Lee C. S., Crowston K. (2005) Meet me in cyberspace: Meetings in the distributed work environment. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Honolulu, August 5–10 .Google Scholar
  • Chudoba K. M., Wynn E., Lu M., Watson-Manheim M. B. (2005) How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Inform. Systems J. 15(4) 279–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B. (2001a) Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(9) 72–79.Google Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B. (2001b) Influence: Science and Practice. (Allyn & Bacon, Boston) .Google Scholar
  • Cohen R. (1978) Threat perception in international crisis. Political Sci. Quart. 93(1) 93–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornelius C., Boos M. (2003) Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated communication by training: Trade-offs in judgmental tasks. Comm. Res. 30(2) 147–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dabbish L., Kraut R. (2006) Email overload at work: An analysis of factors associated with email strain. Proc. ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2006) , (ACM, New York) , 431–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Trevino L. K. (1987) Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quart. 11(3) 355–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidson E. J. (2002) Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirments determination. MIS Quart. 26(4) 329–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Fuller R. M., Valacich J. S. (2008) Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quart. 32(3) 575–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donabedian B. (2006) Optimization and its alternative in media choice: A model of reliance on social-influence processes. Inform. Soc. 22(3) 121–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunne E. J., Stahl M. J., Melhart L. J. (1978) Influence sources of project and functional managers in matrix organizations. Acad. Management J. 21(1) 135–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4) 532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fine G. A. (2007) Authors of the Storm: Meteorologists and the Culture of Prediction. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French J. P. R., Raven B. (1960) The bases of social power. , Cartwright D., Zander A., eds. Group Dynamics. (Harper & Row, New York) , 607–623.Google Scholar
  • Galinsky A. D., Gruenfeld D. H., Magee J. C. (2003) From power to action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(3) 453–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky A. D., Magee J. C., Inesi M. E., Gruenfeld D. H. (2006) Power and perspectives not taken. Psych. Sci. 17(12) 1068–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garrett R. K., Danziger J. N. (2007) IM = interruption management? Instant messaging and disruption in the workplace. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 13(1) 23–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg A. I., Dar-El E. M., Rubin A.-H. E. (1991) Threat perception and the readiness to participate in safety programs. J. Organ. Behav. 12(2) 109–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones E. E. (1964) Ingratitation: A Social-Psychological Analysis. (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Keltner D., Gruenfeld D. H., Anderson C. (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110(2) 265–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda G. (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. (Temple University Press, Philadelphia) .Google Scholar
  • Kurke L. B., Aldrich H. E. (1983) Mintzberg was right!: A replication and extension of The nature of managerial work. Management Sci. 29(8) 975–984.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi P. M. (2007) Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organ. Sci. 18(5) 813–831.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi P. M. (2009) Why do people reject new technologies and stymie organizational changes of which they are in favor? Exploring misalignments between social interactions and materiality. Human Comm. Res. 35(3) 407–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie D. (2006) An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magee J. C., Galinsky A. D. (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2 351–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Rice R. E., Malhotra A., King N., Ba S. L. (2000) Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. 24(4) 569–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazmanian M. A., Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. (2005) Crackberries: The social implications of ubiquitous wireless e-mail devices. , Sørensen C., Yoo Y., Lyytinen K., DeGross J. I., eds. Designing Ubiquitous Inform. Environments: Socio-Technical Issues Challenges, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Vol. 185. (Springer, New York) , 337–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGregor D. (1960) The Human Side of the Enterprise. (McGraw-Hill, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Miller R. L., Brickman P., Bolen D. (1975) Attribution versus persuasion as a means for modifying behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 31(3) 430–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller S., Hickson D., Wilson D. (1996) Decision-making in organizations. , Clegg S. R., Hardy C. C., Nord W. R., eds. Handbook of Organizational Studies. (Sage, London) , 293–312.Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. (1971) Managerial work: Analysis from observation. Management Sci. 18(2) B-97–B-110.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Munkejord K. (2007) Multiple media use in organizations: Identifying practices leading to an alignment paradox. J. Inform., Inform. Tech., Organ. 2 95–118.Google Scholar
  • Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L. (1980) A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organ. Dynam. 9(2) 35–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nardi B. A., Whittaker S., Bradner E. (2000) Interaction and outer-action: Instant messaging in action. Proc. 2000 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work , (ACM, New York) , 79–88.Google Scholar
  • O'Keefe D. J. (2002) Persuasion: Theory and Research, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J., Gash D. C. (1994) Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 12(2) 174–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peters T., Austin N. (1985) MBWA (managing by walking around). Calif. Management Rev. 28(1) 9–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J. (1994) Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force. (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Sutton R. I. (2006) Evidence-based management. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(1) 63–74.Google Scholar
  • Pich M. T., Loch C. H., De Meyer A. (2002) On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Sci. 48(8) 1008–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Putnam L. L., Phillips N., Chapman P. (1996) Metaphors of communication and organization. , Clegg S. R., Hardy C. C., Nord W. R., eds. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) , 375–408.Google Scholar
  • Reinsch N. L., Turner J. W., Tinsley C. H. (2008) Multicommunicating: A practice whose time has come? Acad. Management Rev. 33(2) 391–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Chang S.-J., Torobin J. (1992) Communicator style, media use, organizational level, and use and evaluation of electronic messaging. Management Comm. Quart. 6(1) 3–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rouleau L. (2005) Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. J. Management Stud. 42(7) 1413–1441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rozin P. (2001) Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(1) 2–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders C. S., Robey D., Vaverek K. A. (1994) The persistence of status differentials in computer conferencing. Human Comm. Res. 20(4) 443–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schriesheim C. A., Hinkin T. R. (1990) Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. J. Appl. Psych. 75(3) 246–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheremata W. A. (2000) Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2) 389–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh B. P. (1988) Behaviuoral strategies for influencing immediate superiors. Psychologia 31(1) 34–41.Google Scholar
  • Staudenmayer N., Tyre M., Perlow L. (2002) Time to change: Temporal shifts as enablers of organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13(5) 583–597.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stephan W. G., Stephan C. W., Gudykunst W. B. (1999) Anxiety in intergroup relations: A comparison of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and integrated threat theory. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations 23(4) 613–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephens K. K. (2007) The successive use of information and communication technologies at work. Comm. Theory 17(4) 486–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephens K. K., Davis J. (2009) The social infleunces on electronic multitasking in organizational meetings. Management Comm. Quart. 23(1) 63–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephens K. K., Rains S. A. (2011) Information and communication technology sequences and message repetition in interpersonal interaction. Comm. Res. 38(1) 102–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephens K. K., Sornes J. O., Rice R. E., Browning L. D., Sætre A. S. (2008) Discrete, sequential, and follow-up use of information and communication technology by experienced ICT users. Management Comm. Quart. 22(2) 197–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A., Corbin J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Thamhain H. J., Gemmill G. R. (1974) Influence styles of project managers: Some project performance correlates. Acad. Management J. 17(2) 216–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Theobald T., Cooper C. L. (2006) Shut Up and Listen: The Truth About How to Communicate at Work. (Kogan Page, London) .Google Scholar
  • Thomas J. B., Clark S. M., Gioia D. A. (1993) Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, intepretation, action, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 36(2) 239–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Timmerman C. E. (2002) The moderating effect of mindlessness/mindfulness upon media richness and social influence explanations of organizational media use. Comm. Monogr. 69(2) 111–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Timmerman C. E., Scott C. R. (2006) Virtually working: Communicative and structural predictors of media use and key outcomes in virtual work teams. Comm. Monogr. 73(1) 108–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tompkins P. K., Wanca-Thibault M. (2001) Organizational communication: Preludes and prospects. , Jablin F. M., Putnam L. L., eds. The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) , xvii–xxxi.Google Scholar
  • Tractinsky N., Jarvenpaa S. L. (1995) Information systems design decisions in a global versus domestic context. MIS Quart. 19(4) 507–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trevino L. K., Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. (1990) Understanding managers' media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. , Fulk J., Steinfield C., eds. Organizations and Communication Technology. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) , 71–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trevino L. K., Lengel R., Bodensteiner W., Gerloff E., Muir N. (1990) The richness imperative and cognitive style: The role of individual differences in media choice behavior. Management Comm. Quart. 4(2) 176–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turner J. W., Reinsch N. L. (2007) The business communicator as presence allocator: Multicommunicating, equivocality, and status at work. J. Bus. Comm. 44(1) 36–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyre M. J., Orlikowski W. J. (1994) Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. 5(1) 98–118.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Valacich J. S., George J. F., Nunamaker J. F., Vogel D. R. (1994) Physical proximity effects on computer-mediated group idea generation. Small Group Res. 25(1) 83–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waldron V. R., Hunt M. D., Dsilva M. (1993) Towards a threat management model of upward communication: A study of influence and maintenance tactics in the leader-member dyad. Comm. Stud. 44(3/4) 254–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walther J. B. (1995) Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organ. Sci. 6(2) 186–203.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Watson-Manheim M. B., Bélanger F. (2007) Communication media repertoires: Dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. MIS Quart. 31(2) 267–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4) 409–421.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Woerner S. L., Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. (2004) The media toolbox: Combining media in organizational communication. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, New Orleans, August 6–11 .Google Scholar
  • Yukl G. (1989) Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. J. Management 15(2) 251–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yukl G., Guinan P. J., Sottolano D. (1995) Influence tactics used for different objectives with subordinates, peers, and superiors. Group Organ. Management 20(3) 272–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.