Risks of Corporate Entrepreneurship: Autonomy and Agency Issues

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0645

References

  • Abrahamson E. (2000) Change without pain. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(4) 75–79.Google Scholar
  • Aiken M., Hage J. (1968) Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 33(6) 912–930.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile T. M. (1998) How to kill creativity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76(5) 77–87.Google Scholar
  • Bedeian A. G., Armenakis A. A. (1998) The cesspool syndrome: How dreck floats to the top of declining organizations. Acad. Management Executive 12(1) 58–67.Google Scholar
  • Brandes P., Dharwadkar R., Lemesis G. V. (2003) Effective employee stock option design: Reconciling stakeholder, strategic, and motivational factors. Acad. Management Executive 17(1) 77–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1) 1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman R. A. (1983) Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Sci. 29(12) 1349–1364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman R. A. (1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. 2(3) 239–257.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman R. A. (1994) Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1) 24–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenitz L. W., Barney J. B. (1997) Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision making. J. Bus. Venturing 12(1) 9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Jong J. P. J., Den Hartog D. N. (2007) How leaders influence employees' innovative behavior. Eur. J. Innovation Management 10(1) 41–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dess G. G., Lumpkin G. T. (2005) The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Executive 19(1) 147–156.Google Scholar
  • Dess G. G., Ireland R. D., Zahra S. A., Floyd S. W., Janney J. J., Lane P. J. (2003) Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. J. Management 29(3) 351–378.Google Scholar
  • Devers C. E., Cannella A. A., Reilly G. P., Yoder M. E. (2007) Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent development. J. Management 33(6) 1016–1072.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Ashford S. J. (1993) Selling issues to top management. Acad. Management Rev. 18(3) 397–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Ashford S. J., O'Neill R. M., Lawrence K. A. (2001) Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Acad. Management J. 44(4) 716–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. 13(2) 128–146.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1) 57–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama E. F., Jensen M. C. (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2) 301–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman S. P. (1989) The broken wheel: The inseparability of autonomy and control in innovation within organizations. J. Management Stud. 26(2) 83–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Floyd S. W., Lane P. J. (2000) Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1) 154–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Floyd S. W., Wooldridge B. (1992) Managing strategic consensus: the foundation of effective implementation. Acad. Management Executive 6(4) 27–39.Google Scholar
  • Garvin D. A., Levesque L. C. (2006) Meeting the challenge of corporate entrepreneurship. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(10) 102–112.Google Scholar
  • Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47(2) 209–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gomez-Mejia L. R., Balkin D. B. (1992) Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Acad. Management J. 35(5) 921–955.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goold M., Quinn J. J. (1990) The paradox of strategic controls. Strategic Management J. 11(1) 43–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J. (1990) Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J. Management 16(2) 399–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1) 58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guth W. D., Ginsberg A. (1990) Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management J. 11(Special issue) 5–15.Google Scholar
  • Guth W. D., MacMillan I. C. (1986) Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest. Strategic Management J. 7(4) 313–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., D'Aveni R. A. (1988) Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(1) 1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hand J. R. M. (2008) Give everyone a prize? Employee stock options in private venture-backed firms. J. Bus. Venturing 23(4) 385–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hastings D. F. (1999) Lincoln Electric's harsh lessons from international expansion. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(3) 163–178.Google Scholar
  • Hof R. D. (2008) Google: What goes up….. Business Week 14(April) 21–22.Google Scholar
  • Hornsby J. S., Kuratko D. F., Zahra S. A. (2002) Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale. J. Bus. Venturing 17(3) 253–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoskisson R. E., Hitt M. A., Hill C. W. L. (1993) Managerial incentives and investment in R&D in large multiproduct firms. Organ. Sci. 4(2) 325–341.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4) 305–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones G. R., Butler J. E. (1992) Managing internal corporate entrepreneurship: An agency theory perspective. J. Management 18(4) 733–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter R. M. (1983) The Change Masters: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the American Corporation. (Simon & Schuster, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Key S. (1997) Analyzing managerial discretion: An assessment tool to predict individual policy decision. Internat. J. Oper. Anal. 5(2) 134–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim W. C., Mauborgne R. (1998) Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management J. 19(4) 323–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konovsky M. A. (2000) Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. J. Management 26(3) 489–511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korsgaard M. A., Sapienza H. J., Schweiger D. M. (2002) Beaten before begun: The role of procedural justice in planning change. J. Management 28(4) 497–516.Google Scholar
  • Korsgaard M. A., Schweiger D. M., Sapienza H. J. (1995) Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Acad. Management J. 38(1) 60–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuratko D. F., Goldsby M. G. (2004) Corporate entrepreneurs or rogue middle managers? A framework for ethical corporate entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ethics 55(1) 13–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuratko D. F., Ireland R. D., Hornsby J. S. (2004) Corporate entrepreneurship behavior among managers: A review of theory, research, and practice. , Katz J. A., Shepherd D. A., eds. Corporate Entrepreneurship. (Elsevier, Oxford, UK) , 7–45.Google Scholar
  • Kuratko D. F., Montagno R. V., Hornsby J. S. (1990) Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strategic Management J. 11(Summer special issue) 49–58.Google Scholar
  • Langfred C. W. (2004) Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Acad. Management J. 47(3) 385–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lind E. A., van den Bos K. (2002) When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. , Staw B. M., Kramer R. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 181–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovas B., Ghoshal S. (2000) Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management J. 21(9) 875–896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lumpkin G. T., Dess G. G. (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1) 135–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. (2006) Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management J. 27(3) 201–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath R. G. (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. 44(1) 118–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Sci. 29(7) 770–791.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H., McHugh A. (1985) Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(2) 160–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris M. H., Kuratko D. F. (2002) Corporate Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Development Within Organizations. (Harcourt, Orlando, FL) .Google Scholar
  • Morrison E. W., Milliken F. J. (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4) 706–725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noda T., Bower J. L. (1996) Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation. Strategic Management J. 17(Special issue) 159–192.Google Scholar
  • Nutt P. C. (1999) Surprising but true: Half the decisions in organization fail. Acad. Management Executive 13(4) 75–90.Google Scholar
  • O'Reilly C., Caldwell D. (1998) Cypress Semiconductor (A). . Case HR-8A, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. (1979) A conceptual framework for the deign of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9) 833–848.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(1) 129–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quinn J. B. (1980) Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism. (Homewood, Irwin, IL) .Google Scholar
  • Roethlisberger F. J., Dickson W. J. (1939) Management and the Worker. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Roth K., O'Donnell S. (1996) Foreign subsidiary compensation strategy: An agency theory perspective. Acad. Management J. 39(3) 678–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanders W. G. (2001) Behavioral responses of CEOs to stock ownership and stock option pay. Acad. Management J. 44(3) 477–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanders W. G., Hambrick D. C. (2007) Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 50(5) 1055–1078.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sesil J. C., Kroumova M. K., Blasi J. R., Kruse D. L. (2007) Broad-based employee stock options in US “new economy” firms. British J. Indust. Relations 40(2) 273–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma P., Chrisman J. J. (1999) Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 23(Spring) 11–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stopford J. M., Baden-Fuller C. W. F. (1994) Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management J. 15(7) 521–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiseman R. M., Gomez-Mejia L. R. (1998) A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Acad. Management Rev. 23(1) 133–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra S. A., Jennings D. F., Kuratko D. F. (1999) The antecedents and consequences of firm-level entrepreneurship: The state of the field. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 23(Winter) 45–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.