Transactive Memory Systems: Current Issues and Future Research Directions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0647

References

  • Akgün A. E., Byrne J., Keskin H., Lynn G. S., Imamoglu S. Z. Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective. Inform. Management (2005) 42(8):1105–1120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M., Leidner D. E. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):107–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Austin J. R. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):866–878CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K. A. Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Rev. Psych. (2002) 53:605–634CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borsboom D., Mellenbergh G. J., van Heerden J. The theoretical status of latent variables. Psych. Rev. (2003) 110(2):203–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J. T., Shumate M. The impact of communal knowledge repositories and people-based knowledge management on perceptions of team effectiveness. Management Comm. Quart. (2007) 21(1):29–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi S. Y., Lee H., Yoo Y. The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study. MIS Quart. (2010) 34(4):855–870CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards J. R., Bagozzi R. P. On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psych. Methods (2000) 5(2):155–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46(12):1554–1568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fraidin S. N. When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2004) 93(2):102–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garner J. T. It's not what you know: A transactive memory analysis of knowledge networks at NASA. J. Tech. Writing Comm. (2006) 36(4):329–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F., Argote L., Miron-Spektor E., Todorova G. First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2010) 111(2):102–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray P. H. The effects of knowledge management systems on emergent teams: Towards a research model. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2000) 9(2–3):175–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R. Effects of task characteristics on group products. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1968) 4(2):162–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1998a) 34(5):423–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998b) 74(3):659–671CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81(6):1080–1089CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B., Fraidin S. N. Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2003) 39(4):355–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson M., Moreland R. L. Transactive memory in the classroom. Small Group Res. (2009) 40(5):508–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Majchrzak A. Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(2):260–276LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kanawattanachai P., Yoo Y. The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):783–808CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson J. R.In Search of Synergy in Small Group Performance (2010) (Psychology Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Laughlin P. R., Fishbein M. Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. Progress in Social Psychology (1980) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 127–155Google Scholar
  • Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(4):587–604CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1519–1533LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K., Lange D., Gillis L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):581–598LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K., Belliveau M., Herndon B., Keller J. Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and determinants of collective knowledge. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2007) 103(2):159–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang D. W., Moreland R. L., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21(4):384–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Jarvenpaa S. L., Hollingshead A. B. Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):147–161LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marks M. A., Mathieu J. E., Zaccaro S. J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(3):356–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath J. E.Groups: Interaction and Performance (1984) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Michinov E., Olivier-Chiron E., Rusch E., Chiron B. Influence of transactive memory on perceived performance, job satisfaction and identification in anaesthesia teams. British J. Anaesthesia (2008) 100(3):327–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monge P. R., Contractor N. S.Theories of Communication Networks (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Thompson L. L., Levine J. M., Messick D. M. Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (1999) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 3–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Argote L., Peterson R., Mannix E. Transactive memory in dynamic organizations. Understanding the Dynamic Organization (2003) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 135–162Google Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Myaskovsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):117–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Argote L., Krishnan R., Nye J. L., Brower A. M. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. What's So Social About Social Cognition? Social Cognition Research in Small Groups (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 57–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Argote L., Krishnan R., Tindale R. S., Heath L. Training people to work in groups. Theory and Research on Small Groups: Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues (1998) (Plenum Press, New York) 37–60Google Scholar
  • Okhuysen G. A., Bechky B. A. Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. (2009) 3:463–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Leary M. B., Mortensen M. Go (con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(1):115–131LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Palazzolo E. T. Organizing for information retrieval in transactive memory systems. Comm. Res. (2005) 32(6):726–761CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palazzolo E. T., Serb D. A., She Y. C., Su C. K., Contractor N. S. Coevolution of communication and knowledge networks in transactive memory systems: Using computational models for theoretical development. Comm. Theory (2006) 16(2):223–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearsall M. J., Ellis A. P. J. The effects of critical team member assertiveness on team performance and satisfaction. J. Management (2006) 32(4):575–594CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearsall M. J., Ellis A. P. J., Bell B. S. Building the infrastructure: The effects of role identification behaviors on team cognition development and performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2010) 95(1):192–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearsall M. J., Ellis A. P. J., Stein J. H. Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2009) 109(1):18–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peltokorpi V., Manka M. L. Antecedents and the performance outcome of transactive memory in daycare work groups. Eur. Psychologist (2008) 13(2):103–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prichard J. S., Ashleigh M. J. The effects of team-skills training on transactive memory and performance. Small Group Res. (2007) 38(6):696–726CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rau D. The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory—Performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Res. (2005) 36(6):746–771CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rau D. Top management team transactive memory, information gathering, and perceptual accuracy. J. Bus. Res. (2006) 59(4):416–424CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ren Y. Q., Carley K. M., Argote L. The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):671–682LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schreiber M., Engelmann T. Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups. Comput. Human Behav. (2010) 26(6):1701–1709CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma R., Yetton P. The contingent effects of training, technical complexity, and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(2):219–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw M. E. Scaling group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis. (1963) . Technical Report 1, Contract NR 170-266, Nonr-580(11), Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  • Skilton P. F., Dooley K. J. The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Acad. Management Rev. (2010) 35(1):118–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith-Jentsch K. A., Kraiger K., Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E. Do familiar teammates request and accept more backup? Transactive memory in air traffic control. Human Factors (2009) 51(2):181–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Stewart D. Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 63(3):426–434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steiner I. D.Group Process and Productivity (1972) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Mullen B., Goethals G. R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–208Google Scholar
  • Wegner D. M. A computer network model of human transactive memory. Soc. Cognition (1995) 13(3):319–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Erber R., Raymond P. Transactive memory in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1991) 61(6):923–929CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Giuliano T., Hertel P. T., Ickes W. Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (1985) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 253–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yuan Y. C., Carboni I., Ehrlich K. The impact of awareness and accessibility on expertise retrieval: A multilevel network perspective. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2010a) 61(4):700–714Google Scholar
  • Yuan Y. C., Fulk J., Monge P. R. Access to information in connective and communal transactive memory systems. Comm. Res. (2007) 34(2):131–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yuan Y. C., Monge P., Fulk J., Weaver K. M. Social capital and transactive memory systems in work groups: A multilevel approach. Best Paper Proc. 65th Acad. Management Conf. (2005) Honolulu, CD(Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY) Google Scholar
  • Yuan Y. C., Fulk J., Monge P. R., Contractor N. Expertise directory development, shared task interdependence, and strength of communication network ties as multilevel predictors of expertise exchange in transactive memory work groups. Comm. Res. (2010b) 37(1):20–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Z. X., Hempel P. S., Han Y. L., Tjosvold D. Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92(6):1722–1730CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.