PERSPECTIVE—Collective Intelligence in the Organization of Science

References

• Asch S. E. Opinions and social pressure. Scientific Amer. (1955) 193(5):31–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amsterdam B. Mirror self-image reactions before age two. Dev. Psychobiol. (1972) 5(4):297–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos C., Lewis M. W. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):696–717Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Miron-Spektor E. Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1123–1137Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres N. Using organizational economics to study organizational capability development and strategy. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1138–1143Link, Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Rogers K. M., Corley K. G. Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1144–1156Link, Google Scholar
• Atlee T., Pór G. Collective intelligence as a field of multi-disciplinary study and practice. (2000) . Retrieved April 6, 2011, http://www.community-intelligence.com/?q=node/130Google Scholar
• Augier M., March J. G., Sullivan B. N. Notes on the evolution of a research community: Organization studies in anglophone North America, 1945–2000. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):85–95Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky B. A. Making organizational theory work: Institutions, occupations, and negotiated orders. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1157–1167Link, Google Scholar
• Bloom H.Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From the Big Bang to the 21st Century (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Halgin D. S. On network theory. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1168–1181Link, Google Scholar
• Breznitz D. Collaborative public space in a national innovation system: A case study of the Israeli military's impact on the software industry. Indust. Innovation (2005) 21(1):31–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Reagans R. E. Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1182–1194Link, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Obel B. Computational modeling for what-is, what-might-be, and what-should-be studies—And triangulation. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1195–1202Link, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R., Yoffie D. Wintel: Cooperation and conflict. Management Sci. (2005) 53(4):584–598Link, Google Scholar
• Crane D.Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities (1972) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Dacin M. T., Dacin P. A., Tracey P. Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1203–1213Link, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lewin A. Y. Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(1):1–9Link, Google Scholar
• Davis J. P., Bingham C. B., Eisenhardt K. M. Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(2):480–499Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D., Dunne D. D. Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1214–1223Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Jarvenpaa S. L., Majchrzak A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1224–1239Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Orlikowski W. J. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1240–1253Link, Google Scholar
• Fuchs E. R. H. Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance. Res. Policy (2010) 39(9):1133–1147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R. Conferences as venues for the configuration of emerging organizational fields: The case of cochlear implants. J. Management Stud. (2008) 45(6):1061–1088Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A., Cusumano M. A.Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine de Gruyter, New York) Google Scholar
• Gulley N., Lakhani K. The determinants of individual performance and collective value in private-collective software innovation. (2010) . Working Paper 10-065, Harvard Business School, Boston. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1550352Google Scholar
• Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):716–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., Levien R.The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability (2004) (Harvard Business Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Jeppesen L. B., Lakhani K. R. Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast research. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(5):1016–1033Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson G. J., Ambrose P. J. Neo-tribes: The power and potential of online communities in health care. Comm. ACM (2006) 49(1):107–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagan J.The Second Year: The Emergence of Self-Awareness (1981) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Kuhn T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1996) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson J. R.In Search of Synergy in Small Group Performance (2009) (Psychology Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Larsson R., Bengtsson L., Henriksson K., Sparks J. The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):285–305Link, Google Scholar
• Lester R. K., Piore M. J.Innovation: The Missing Dimension (2004) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lévy P.Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace (1997) (Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lewis K., Herndon B. Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1254–1265Link, Google Scholar
• Malone T. W., Laubacher R., Dellarocas C. The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2010) 51(3):21–31Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• McCauley C. The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 57(2):250–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B. Reorganizing the boundaries of trust: From discrete alternatives to hybrid forms. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1266–1276Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E.Groups: Interaction and Performance (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Northcraft G. B., Tenbrunsel A. E. Effective matrices, decision frames, and cooperation in volunteer dilemmas: A theoretical perspective on academic peer review. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1277–1285Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1286–1296Link, Google Scholar
• Olk P., Griffith T. L. Creating and disseminating knowledge among organizational scholars: The role of special issues. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(1):120–129Link, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M., Brief A. P., Staw B. M. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior (2008) 28(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 185–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(4):599–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Postmes T., Spears R., Cihangir S. Quality of decision making and group norms. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 80(6):918–930Crossref, Google Scholar
• Povinelli D. J., Preuss T. M. Theory of mind: Evolutionary history of a cognitive specialization. Trends Neurosci. (1995) 18(9):418–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price D. J. d. S.Little Science, Big Science … and Beyond (1963) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Raisch S., Birkinshaw J., Probst G., Tushman M. L. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):685–695Link, Google Scholar
• Ritvala T., Granqvist N. Institutional entrepreneurs and structural holes in new field emergence—Comparative case study of cholesterol-lowering functional foods and nanotechnology in Finland. (2006) . Working Paper W-411, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., McGrath P. Advancing the conceptualization and operationalization of novelty in organizational research. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1297–1311Link, Google Scholar
• Schippers M. C., Den Hartog D. N., Koopman P. L. Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Appl. Psych. (2007) 56(2):189–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schippers M. C., Den Hartog D. N., Koopman P. L., Wienk J. A. Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. J. Organ. Behav. (2003) 24(6):779–802Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapira Z. “I've got a theory paper—Do you?”: Conceptual, empirical, and theoretical contributions to knowledge in the organizational sciences. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1312–1321Link, Google Scholar
• Simonton D. K. Scientific status of disciplines, individuals, and ideas: Empirical analyses of the potential impact of theory. Rev. General Psych. (2006) 10(2):98–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):522–536Link, Google Scholar
• Sørensen J. B., Fassiotto M. A. Organizations as fonts of entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1322–1331Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman J. D., Wittenberg J. Path dependence, competition, and succession in the dynamics of scientific revolution. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(3):322–341Link, Google Scholar
• Sutton R. I., Staw B. M. What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(3):371–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor F. W. The principles of scientific management. The Principles of Scientific Management (1911) (Harper & Brothers, New York) 30–60Chapter 2Google Scholar
• Tolbert P. S., Davis R. J., Sine W. D. Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1332–1344Link, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J. Fear and loathing in organization studies. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(6):687–692Link, Google Scholar
• v. Werder A. Corporate governance and stakeholder opportunism. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1345–1358Link, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. What theory is not, theorizing is. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(3):385–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley A. W., Chabris C. F., Pentland A., Hashmi N., Malone T. W. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science (2010) 330(6004):686–688Crossref, Google Scholar