Reorganizing the Boundaries of Trust: From Discrete Alternatives to Hybrid Forms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0649

References

  • Ashraf N., Bohnet I., Piankov N. Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experiment. Econom. (2006) 9(3):193–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bachmann R., Zaheer A.Handbook of Trust Research (2006) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bamberger P. Beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research. Acad. Management Rev. (2008) 51(5):839–846CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berg J., Dickhaut J. W., McCabe K. A. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 10(1):122–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Capra C. M., Lanier K., Meer S. Attitudinal and behavioral measures of trust: A new comparison. (2007) . Working paper, Emory University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Colquitt J. A., Scott B. A., LePine J. A. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationship with risk taking and job performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92(4):909–927CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook K. S.Trust in Society (2001) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cook K. S., Emerson R. M. Power, equity, and commitment in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1978) 43(5):721–739CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook K. S., Hardin R., Levi M.Cooperation Without Trust? (2005) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Corazzini R. Trust as a complex multi-dimensional construct. Psych. Reports (1977) 40:75–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox J. C. How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. (2004) 46(2):260–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings L. L., Bromiley P., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 261–287Google Scholar
  • Currall S. C., Judge T. A. Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 64(2):151–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dietz G., Den Hartog D. N. Measuring trust inside organizations. Personnel Rev. (2006) 35(5):557–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dirks K. T., Ferrin D. L. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(4):611–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dirks K. T., Lewicki R. J., Zaheer A. Special topic forum on “Repairing relationships within and between organizations”. Acad. Management Rev. (2009) 34(1):68–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckel C. C., Wilson R. K. Is trust a risky decision? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2004) 55(4):447–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrin D. L., Dirks K. T. The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):18–31LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrin D. L., Bligh M. C., Kohles J. C. It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2008) 107(2):161–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fichman M. Straining towards trust: Some constraints on studying trust in organizations. J. Organ. Behav. (2003) 24(2):133–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman J. Efficiency and rationality in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):163–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gambetta D.Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (1988) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Gibbons R. Taking Coase seriously. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):145–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gillespie N. Measuring trust in work relationships: The behavioral trust inventory. (2003) Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of ManagementSeattleGoogle Scholar
  • Glaeser E. L., Laibson D. I., Scheinkman J. A., Soutter C. L. Measuring trust. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):811–846CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardin R. The street-level epistemology of trust. Analyse und Kritik (1992) 14:152–176Google Scholar
  • Hardin R.Trust and Trustworthiness (2002) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karlan D. S. Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(5):1688–1699CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelley H. H., Levine D. Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (1967) (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln) 192–238Google Scholar
  • Kelley H. H.Causal Schemata and the Attribution Process (1972) (General Learning Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Korsgaard M. A., Brodt S. E., Whitener E. M. Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(2):312–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer R. M., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 216–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer R. M. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999) 50:569–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer R. M., Cook K. S.Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (2004) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R.Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kreps D. M., Alt J. E., Shepsle K. A. Corporate culture and economic theory. Perspectives on Positive Political Economy (1990) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 90–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhn T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Lawler E. J., Yoon J. Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(1):89–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewicki R., Brinsfield C., Donohue W. A., Rogan R. R., Kaufman S. Trust as a heuristic. Framing in Negotiation: State of the Art (2010) (Peter Lang Publishing, New York) 110–135Google Scholar
  • Lewicki R. J., McAllister D. J., Beis R. J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):438–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Olsen J. P.Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (1989) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Davis J. H. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84(1):123–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAllister D. J. Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):24–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B., Tortoriello M. Measuring trust in organizational research: Review and recommendations. J. Trust Res. (2011) 1(1):23–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B., Zaheer A., Bachmann R., Zaheer A. Does trust still matter? Research on the role of trust in inter-organizational exchange. Handbook of Trust Research (2006) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) 280–300Google Scholar
  • McEvily B., Perrone V., Zaheer A. Introduction to the special issue on trust in an organizational context. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):1–4LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B., Weber R., Radzevick J. R. Whom do you trust and how much does it cost? An experiment on the measurement of trust. (2011a) . Working paper, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B., Zaheer A., F Kamal D. Asymmetric antecedents of trust in interorganizational exchange: Towards a dyadic view. (2011b) . Working paper, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):473–490CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyerson D., Weick K. E., Kramer R. M., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Swift trust and temporary groups. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 166–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(1):90–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau D. M., Burt R. S., Sitkin S. B., Camerer C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):393–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schechter L. Traditional trust measurement and the risk confound: An experiment in rural Paraguay. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 62(2):272–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schifrin R. M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and general theory. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84(2):127–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seppänen R., Blomqvist K., Sundqvist S. Measuring inter-organizational trust—A critical review of the empirical research in 1990–2003. Indust. Marketing Management (2007) 36(2):249–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior (1957) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185(4157):1124–1131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. J. Law Econom. (1993) 36(1):453–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Harris J., Shenkar O., Reuer J. Interorganizational trust. Handbook of Strategic Alliances (2005) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 169–197Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.