A Balancing Act: How Organizations Pursue Consistency in Routine Functioning in the Face of Ongoing Change

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0653

References

  • Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. I. (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1) 43–68.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Todorova G. (2007) Organizational learning. , Hodgkinson G. P., Ford J. K., eds. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 22. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) , 193–234.Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Shipilov A. V. (2006) Ecological approaches to organizations. , Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B., Nord W. R., eds. The Sage Handbook for Organization Studies. (Sage, London) , 55–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker M. C. (2004) Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 13(4) 643–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker M. C., Lazaric N., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. (2005) Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5) 775–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bigley G. A., Roberts K. H. (2001) The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Management J. 44(6) 1281–1299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnholtz J. P., Cohen M. D., Hoch S. V. (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2) 315–332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blatt R. (2009) Tough love: How communal schemas and contracting practices build relational capital in entrepreneurial teams. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3) 533–551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P. (1986) The forms of capital. , Richardson J. G., ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. (Routledge, London) , 241–258.Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cicourel A. V. (1973) Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. (Penguin Books, Harmoundsworth, UK) .Google Scholar
  • Cohen M. D. (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5) 773–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., Bacdayan P. (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4) 554–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., Burkhart R., Dosi G., Egidi M., Marengo L., Warglien M., Winter S. (1996) Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corporate Change 5(3) 653–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coriat B., Dosi G. (1998) Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: On the co-evolution of competences, conflicts and organizational routines. , Chandler A. D., Hagström P., Sölvell Ö., eds. The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) , 103–133.Google Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) .Google Scholar
  • D'Adderio L. (2008) The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res. Policy 37(5) 769–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Bohmer R. M., Pisano G. P. (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4) 685–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4) 532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Graebner M. E. (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1) 25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farjoun M. (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2) 202–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6) 611–629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4) 727–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1) 94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. (2005) Organizational routines and the macro-actor. , Czarniawska B., Hernes T., eds. Actor-Network Theory and Organizing. (Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, Malmö, Sweden) , 91–111.Google Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. (2008) Routine dynamics. , Barry D., Hansen H., eds. The Sage Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization. (Sage, London) , 302–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Rafaeli A. (2002) Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. J. Management Stud. 39(3) 309–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galunic D. C., Weeks J. R. (2002) Intraorganizational ecology. , Baum J. A. C., ed. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) , 75–97.Google Scholar
  • Gavetti G. (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities' development. Organ. Sci. 16(6) 599–617.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Chittipeddi K. (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management J. 12(6) 433–448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. (1992) Problems of explanation in economic sociology. , Nohria N., Eccles R. G., eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) , 25–56.Google Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Suddaby R., Hinings C. R. (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Management J. 45(1) 58–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. (1989) Organizational Ecology. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A. B., Douglas Y. (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3) 476–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville J. A. (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6) 618–636.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H., Kilduff M., Tsai W. (2005) Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectives at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. 16(4) 359–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karim S., Mitchell W. (2000) Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11) 1061–1081.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M., Brass D. J. (2010) Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1) 317–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotabe M., Martin X., Domoto H. (2003) Gaining from vertical partnerships: Knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management J. 24(4) 293–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leidner R. (1993) Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life. (University of California Press, Berkeley) .Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D., Rerup C. (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4) 502–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Locke K. (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A. (1958) Organizations. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • NC League of Municipalities (2001) What are we doing with garbage—2001? . Results of 2001 NCLM Solid Waste Practices and Finances Survey of North Carolina Municipalities, Raleigh.Google Scholar
  • NC League of Municipalities (2003) What are we doing with garbage—2003? . Results of 2003 NCLM Solid Waste Practices and Finances Survey of North Carolina Municipalities, Raleigh.Google Scholar
  • NC Local Government Performance Measurement Project (2003) Final Report on City Services for Fiscal Year 2001–2002: Performance and cost data. . Report, Institute of Government, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2) 242–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narduzzo A., Rocco E., Warglien M. (2000) Talking about routines in the field. , Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G., eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. (Oxford University Press, New York) , 27–50.Google Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Nicolini D. (2011) Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organ. Sci. 22(3) 602–620.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5) 793–815.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. (2008a) Issues in empirical field studies of organizational routines. , Becker M. C., ed. Handbook of Organizational Routines. (Edward Elgar, UK) , 281–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. (2008b) Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Inform. Organ. 18(4) 235–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T., Reuter H. H. (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3) 484–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rafaeli A., Vilnai-Yavetz I. (2004) Emotion as a connection of physical artifacts and organizations. Organ. Sci. 15(6) 671–686.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C., Feldman M. S. (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schema: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3) 577–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rindova V. P., Petkova A. P. (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2) 217–232.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salvato C. (2009) Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ. Sci. 20(2) 384–409.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salvato C., Rerup C. (2011) Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. J. Management 37(2) 468–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stene E. O. (1940) An approach to a science of administration. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 34(6) 1124–1137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L. (1990) Information and Organizations. (University of California Press, Berkeley) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A. L. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D. (1967) Organizations in Action. (McGraw-Hill, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Waste Age (1998) Software helps haulers merge routes. (October 26) 37.Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. (McGraw-Hill, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M. (2007) Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) .Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. (1999) Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , Sutton R. I., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21. (JAI Press, Stamford, CT) , 81–123.Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G. (1968) Toward a neo-Schumpeterian theory of the firm. . Report P-3802, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. [Republished in 2006, Indust. Corporate Change 15 125–141.] Google Scholar
  • Yin R. K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Zbaracki M. J., Bergen M. (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5) 955–972.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Reuer J. J., Singh H. (2002) Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 13(6) 701–713.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.