How Knowledge Transfer Impacts Performance: A Multilevel Model of Benefits and Liabilities

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0697

References

  • Aeppel T. (2002) Tricks of the trade: On factory floors, top workers hide secrets to success. Wall Street Journal (July 1):A1.Google Scholar
  • Anand N, Gardner HK, Morris T. (2007) Knowledge-based innovation: Emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Acad. Management J. 50(2):406–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L. (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Argote L. (2000) The Psychological Foundations of Knowledge Transfer in Organizations. (Academic Press, San Diego).Google Scholar
  • Argote L, Darr E. (2000) Repositories of knowledge in franchise organizations. , Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. (Oxford University Press, New York), 51–69.Google Scholar
  • Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R. (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P, Levine JM, Moreland RL. (2000) Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organ. Behav. Human Design Processes 82(1):1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C. (1994) On Organizational Learning, 2nd ed. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Arrow KJ. (1969) Classificatory notes on the production and transmission of technological knowledge. Amer. Econom. Rev. 59(2):29–35.Google Scholar
  • Baker S. (2009) Beware social media snake oil. Bus. Week (December 3) . http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_50/b4159048693735.htm.Google Scholar
  • Baker WE, Levine SS. (2010) Mechanisms of generalized exchange: Towards an integrated model. . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  • Baker WE, Faulkner RR, Fisher GA. (1998) Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(2):147–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA. (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Black LJ, Carlile PR, Repenning NP. (2004) A dynamic theory of expertise and occupational boundaries in new technology implementation: Building on Barley's study of CT scanning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(4):572–607.Google Scholar
  • Blau PM. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Cross RL. (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JS, Duguid P. (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JS, Duguid P. (2000) Balancing act: How to capture knowledge without killing it. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(3):73–80, 212.Google Scholar
  • Bughin JY. (2008) The rise of Enterprise 2.0. J. Direct, Data, Digital Marketing Practice 9(3):251–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson JS, Reagans RE. (2011) Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1182–1194.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burton RM, Obel B. (1988) Opportunism, incentives, and the M-form hypothesis: A laboratory study. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 10(1):99–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton RM, Obel B. (1995) The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 1(1):57–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton RM, Obel B. (2011) Computational modeling for what-is, what-might-be, and what-should-be studies—And triangulation. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1195–1202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cabrera Á., Cabrera EF. (2002) Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organ. Stud. 23(5):687–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cardinal LB, Turner SF, Fern MJ, Burton RM. (2011) Organizing for product development across technological environments: Performance trade-offs and priorities. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1000–1025.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carley KM. (2009) Computational modeling for reasoning about the social behavior of humans. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 15(1):47–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen KJ, Cyert RM. (1965) Simulation of organizational behavior. , March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations. (Rand McNally, Chicago), 305–334.Google Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Constant D, Sproull L, Kiesler S. (1996) The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. 7(2):119–135.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cross RL, Sproull L. (2004) More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. 15(4):446–462.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D. (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport TH, Prusak L. (1998) Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB. (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):480–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA, van Knippenberg D. (2008) Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 12(1):22–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dodds PS, Muhamad R, Watts DJ. (2003) An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science 301(5634):827–829.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donahue KB. (2001) Knowledge management: Beyond databases. Harvard Management Update 6(5):3–4.Google Scholar
  • Dutton JM, Thomas A. (1984) Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):235–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economist, The (2010) Yammering away at the office: A distraction or a bonus? (January 28) . http://www.economist.com/node/15350928.Google Scholar
  • Epple D, Argote L, Murphy K. (1996) An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper. Res. 44(1):77–86.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fahey L, Prusak L. (1998) The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. Calif. Management Rev. 40(3):265–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K. (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn FJ. (2005) Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):737–750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fulk J, Heino R, Flanagin AJ, Monge PR, Bar F. (2004) A test of the individual action model for organizational information commons. Organ. Sci. 15(5):569–585.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gagné RM. (1985) The Conditions of Learning, 4th ed. (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).Google Scholar
  • Galbraith CS. (1990) Transferring core manufacturing technologies in high-technology firms. Calif. Management Rev. 32(4):56–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Games PA, Howell JF. (1976) Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal N's and/or variances: A Monte Carlo study. J. Ed. Statist. 1(2):113–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gargiulo M, Ertug G, Galunic C. (2009) The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):299–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Kumaraswamy A. (2005) Vicious and virtuous circles in the management of knowledge: The case of Infosys Technologies. MIS Quart. 29(1):9–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW. (2005) Strategy-making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geertz C. (1973) Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. The Interpretation of Cultures. (Basic Books, New York), 3–30.Google Scholar
  • Ghoshal S, Korine H, Szulanski G. (1994) Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Sci. 40(1):96–110.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R. (1999) Taking Coase seriously. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):145–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (Aldine De Gruyter, New York).Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant RM. (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter special issue):109–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR, Hansen MT. (2005) When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. 26(1):1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR, Hansen MT. (2007) Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management J. 28(11):1133–1153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT. (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT. (2002) Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. 13(3):232–248.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT. (2009a) Collaboration: How Leaders Avoid the Traps, Create Unity, and Reap Big Results. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Hansen MT. (2009b) When internal collaboration is bad for your company. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(4):82–88.Google Scholar
  • Hansen MT, Løvås B. (2004) How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):801–822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT, Mors ML, Løvås B. (2005) Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Acad. Management J. 48(5):776–793.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT, Nohria N, Tierney T. (1999) What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(2):1–10.Google Scholar
  • Hansen MT, Podolny JM, Pfeffer J. (2001) So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital. , Gabbay SM, Leenders RTAJ, eds. Social Capital of Organizations. (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 21–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon AB, Sutton RI. (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison JR, Carroll GR. (2006) Culture and Demography in Organizations. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson RM, Clark KB. (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Patterson M, Pfeffer J. (2001) Bothered by abstraction: The effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. J. Appl. Psych. 86(6):1232–1243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirschman AO. (1982) Rival interpretations of market society: Civilizing, destructive, or feeble? J. Econom. Lit. 20(4):1463–1484.Google Scholar
  • Hollingshead AB. (2001) Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1080–1089.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homans GC. (1958) Social behavior as exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 63(6):597–606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jick TD. (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalnins A, Chung W. (2006) Social capital, geography, and survival: Gujarati immigrant entrepreneurs in the U.S. lodging industry. Management Sci. 52(2):233–247.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalnins A, Mayer KJ. (2004) Franchising, ownership, and experience: A study of pizza restaurant survival. Management Sci. 50(12):1716–1728.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani KR, von Hippel E. (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazega E. (2001) The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Firm. (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazega E, Pattison PE. (1999) Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: A case study. Soc. Networks 21(1):67–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazega E, Mounier L, Snijders T, Tubaro P. (2011) Norms, status and the dynamics of advice networks: A case study. Soc. Networks . Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabási A-L, Brewer D, Christakis N, et al. (2009) Computational social science. Science 323(5915):721–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lenox MJ, Rockart SF, Lewin AY. (2010) Does interdependency affect firm and industry profitability? An empirical test. Strategic Management J. 31(2):121–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lenth RV. (2001) Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. Amer. Statist. 55(3):187–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levene H. (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. , Olkin I, Ghurye SG, Hoeffding W, Madow WG, Mann HB, eds. Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 278–292.Google Scholar
  • Levin DZ, Cross RL. (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levine SS. (2005) Do talk to strangers: Encouraging performative ties to create competitive advantage. Knowledge@Wharton (September 21) . http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1285.Google Scholar
  • Levine SS, Kurzban R. (2006) Explaining clustering in social networks: Towards an evolutionary theory of cascading benefits. Managerial Decision Econom. 27(2–3):173–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levine SS, Prietula MJ. (2010) Where and when can open source thrive? Towards a theory of robust performance. , Ågerfalk P, Boldyreff C, González-Barahona J, Madey G, Noll J, eds. Open Source Software: New Horizons. (Springer, New York), 156–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt RE, Thomsen J, Christiansen TR, Kunz JC, Jin Y, Nass C. (1999) Simulating project work processes and organizations: Toward a micro-contingency theory of organizational design. Management Sci. 45(11):1479–1495.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K. (2004) Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Sci. 50(11):1519–1533.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K, Lange D, Gillis L. (2005) Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. 16(6):581–598.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K, Belliveau M, Herndon B, Keller J. (2007) Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(2):159–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin Z, Zhao X, Ismail KM, Carley KM. (2006) Organizational design and restructuring in response to crises: Lessons from computational modeling and real-world cases. Organ. Sci. 17(5):598–618.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Macy MW, Willer R. (2002) From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28 143–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A. (1997) What to do when you can't have it all: Toward a theory of sociotechnical dependencies. Human Relations 50(5):535–566.Google Scholar
  • March JG. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Sproull LS, Tamuz M. (1991) Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. 2(1):1–13.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee AP. (2006) Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(3):21–28.Google Scholar
  • McAfee AP. (2009) Shattering the myths about Enterprise 2.0. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(11):1–6.Google Scholar
  • McCraw TK. (1994) International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation. (Harvard Business School, Boston).Google Scholar
  • McDermott R. (1999) Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. Calif. Management Rev. 41(4):103–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDermott R, Archibald D. (2010) Harnessing your staff's informal networks. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88(3):82–89.Google Scholar
  • Molm LD, Collett JL, Schaefer DR. (2007) Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):205–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moss S, Edmonds B. (2005) Sociology and simulation: Statistical and qualitative cross-validation. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4):1095–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Newell A. (1990) Unified Theories of Cognition. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. (2005) Social networks, the Tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orr JE. (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Perlow L, Weeks J. (2002) Who's helping whom? Layers of culture and workplace behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 23(4):345–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow LA. (1999) The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):57–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow LA, Okhuysen GA, Repenning NP. (2002) The speed trap: Exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Acad. Management J. 45(5):931–955.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Sutton RI. (1999) The Knowing–Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Podolny JM, Baron JN. (1997) Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(5):673–693.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pondy LR, Mitroff II. (1979) Beyond open system models of organization. , Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 3–39.Google Scholar
  • Prietula MJ. (2011) Thoughts on complexity and computational models. , Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 93–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D. (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ritter FE, Schooler LJ. (2001) The learning curve. , Smelser NJ, Baltes PB, eds. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. (Pergamon, Oxford, UK), 8602–8605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruggles R. (1998) The state of the notion: Knowledge management in practice. Calif. Management Rev. 40(3):80–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sena J, Sena M. (2008) Corporate social networking. Issues Inform. Systems 9(2):227–231.Google Scholar
  • Shamsie J, Martin X, Miller D. (2009) In with the old, in with the new: Capabilities, strategies, and performance among the Hollywood studios. Strategic Management J. 30(13):1440–1452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA. (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):125–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Soo C, Devinney T, Midgley D, Deering A. (2002) Knowledge management: Philosophy, processes, and pitfalls. Calif. Management Rev. 44(4):129–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck WH. (1992) Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J. Management Stud. 29(6):713–740.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman JD, Repenning NP, Kofman F. (1997) Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Sci. 43(4):503–521.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter special issue):27–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):9–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. (2003) Sticky Knowledge: Barriers to Knowing in the Firm. (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  • Teece DJ. (1977) Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Econom. J. 87(346):242–261.Google Scholar
  • Tripsas M. (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):119–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M, Gavetti G. (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Nordenflycht A. (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh JP, Ungson GR. (1991) Organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):57–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner DM. (1986) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. , Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior. (Springer-Verlag, New York), 185–205.Google Scholar
  • Weick KE. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Wenger EC, Snyder WM. (2000) Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(1):139–145.Google Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Zajac EJ. (1998) The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):127–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wijnhoven F. (2001) Acquiring organizational learning norms: A contingency approach for understanding deutero learning. Management Learn. 32(2):181–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter SG. (1987) Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. , Teece DJ, ed. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 159–184.Google Scholar
  • Wittenbaum GM, Hollingshead AB, Botero IC. (2004) From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Comm. Monographs 71(3):286–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yamagishi T, Cook KS. (1993) Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Soc. Psych. Quart. 56(4):235–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yuan YC, Fulk J, Monge PR, Contractor N. (2010) Expertise directory development, shared task interdependence, and strength of communication network ties as multilevel predictors of expertise exchange in transactive memory work groups. Comm. Res. 37(1):20–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.