Creative Projects: A Less Routine Approach Toward Getting New Things Done

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0706

References

  • Adler PS, Obstfeld D. (2007) The role of affect in creative projects and exploratory search. Indust. Corporate Change 16:19–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvarez SA, Barney JB. (2007) Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1:11–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile T. (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
  • Baker WE, Faulkner RR. (1991) Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 97:279–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker T, Nelson R. (2005) Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50:329–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA. (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17:3–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Becker MC. (2004) Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 13:643–677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker MC, Knudsen T, March JG. (2006) Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty. Indust. Corporate Change 15:353–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnholtz JP, Cohen M, Hoch S. (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18:315–332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM. (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA. (1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. 2:239–262.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA. (1994) Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39:24–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burns T, Stalker GM. (1961) The Management of Inovation. (Tavistock, London).Google Scholar
  • Cohen M. (2007a) Administrative behavior: Laying the foundations for Cyert and March. Organ. Sci. 18:503–506.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. (2007b) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28:773–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Bacdayan P. (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5:554–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, March JG. (1974) Leadership and Ambiguity. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP. (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart 17:1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G, Egidi M, Marengo L, Warglien M, Winter S. (1996) Routines and other recurrent action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corporate Change 5:653–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R, March J. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D. (2002) Building grounded theory: Some principles and practices. , Baum JAC, ed. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 849–867.Google Scholar
  • Duncan WR. (1996) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. (Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA).Google Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP. (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:685–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14:532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21:1105–1121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emirbayer M, Mische A. (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103:962–1023.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11:611–629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M, Pentland B. (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48:94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss NJ. (2003) Bounded rationality and tacit knowledge in the organizational capabilities approach: An assessment and a re-evaluation. Indust. Corporate Change 12:185–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gann D, Salter A. (2000) Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems. Res. Policy 29:955–972.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick CJ, Hackman JR. (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47:65–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J. (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47:209–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert C. (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48:741–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Grabher G. (2002) Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Stud. 36:205–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A. (2002) Brokering knowledge: Learning and innovation. , Sutton RI, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 41–85.Google Scholar
  • Hargadon A. (2003) How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Henderson RM. (1992) Technological change and the management of architectural knowledge. , Kochan TA, Useem M, eds. Transforming Organizations. (Oxford University Press, New York), 118–132.Google Scholar
  • Henderson RM, Clark KB. (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobday M. (2000) The project-based organization: An ideal form for managing complex projects and systems? Res. Policy 29:871–893.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville J. (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16:618–636.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jelinek M, Schoonhoven CB. (1993) The Innovation Marathon: Lessons from High Technology Firms. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Jick T. (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24:602–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kidder T. (1981) The Soul of a New Machine. (Little, Brown and Company, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Knott AM. (2001) The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Sci. 47:430–448.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, Rerup C. (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17:502–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG. (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin K. (1951) Field Theory in Social Science. (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Lillrank P. (2003) The quality of standard, routine and nonroutine processes. Organ. Stud. 24:215–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke K. (1996) Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years? J. Management Inquiry 5:239–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Long Lingo E, O'Mahony S. (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55:47–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lundin R, Soderholm A. (1995) A theory of the temporary organization. Scand. J. Management 11:437–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG. (1978) Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell J. Econom. 9:587–608.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2:71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA. (1958) Organizations. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Miner AS. (1991) Organizational evolution and the social ecology of jobs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 56:772–785.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner AS, Estler SE. (1985) Accrual mobility: Job mobility in higher education through responsibility accrual. J. Higher Ed. 56:121–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner AS, Bassoff P, Moorman C. (2001) Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21:246–275.Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Theoret A. (1976) The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21:246–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R, Winter S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50:100–130.Google Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. (2011) Saying more and less of what we know: The social processes of knowledge articulation and innovation. . Working paper, California State Fullerton University, Fullerton.Google Scholar
  • Obstfeld D, Gong Y, Ventresca M, Lacey YR. (2011) A creative projects perspective on entrepreneurial action. . Working paper, California State Fullerton University, Fullerton.Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11:404–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pava C. (1986) Redesigning sociotechnical systems design: Concepts and methods for the 1990s. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 22:201–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT. (2004) Towards an ecology of inter-organizational routines: A conceptual framework for the analysis of net-enabled organizations. Proc. 37th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS-37) . CD-ROM. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Feldman MS. (2008) Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Inform. Organ. 18:235–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Rueter HH. (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39:484–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. (1967) A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32:194–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. (1977) On “Ambiguity and choice in organizations” by James G. March and J. P. Olsen. Contemporary Soc. 6:294–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M. (1958) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Prencipe A, Tell F. (2001) Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Res. Policy 30:1373–1394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarasvathy SD, Dew N, Velamuri SR, Venkataraman S. (2003) Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. , Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. (Springer, New York), 77–96.Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter JA. (1934) Theory of Economic Development. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter JA. (1947) The creative response in economic history. J. Econom. Hist. 7:149–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schutz A. (1967) The Phenomenology of the Social World. Translated and edited by , Walsh G, Lehnert F, eds. (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
  • Simmel G. (1950) The isolated individual and the dyad. , Wolff KH, ed. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. (Free Press, Glencoe, IL), 118–144.Google Scholar
  • Simon HA. (1945) Administrative Behavior. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Simon HA. (1973) The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence 4:181–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A. (1988) The articulation of project work: An organizational process. Soc. Quart. 29:163–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A. (1993) Continual Permutations of Action. (Aldine de Gruyter, New York).Google Scholar
  • Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Weiner C. (1985) Social Organization of Medical Work. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Stene EO. (1940) Public administration—An approach to a science of administration. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 34:1124–1137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suchman LA. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Interface. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18:509–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H. (2009) A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. 20:941–957.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turner JR, Keegan A. (1999) The versatile project-based organization: Governance and operational control. Eur. Management J. 17:296–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turner JR, Keegan A. (2001) Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization: Roles of the broker and steward. Eur. Management J. 19:254–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML, O'Reilly CA. (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Management Rev. 38:8–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Weick K. (1998) Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ. Sci. 9:543–555.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K, Quinn RE. (1999) Organizational change and development. Annual Rev Psych. 50:361–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K, Sutcliffe KM. (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. 17:514–524.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D. (1999) Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 81–123.Google Scholar
  • Weick K, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D. (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16:409–421.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wezel FC, Cattani G, Pennings JM. (2006) Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organ. Sci. 17:691–709.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winter SG. (1987) Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. , Teece DJ, ed. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 159–184.Google Scholar
  • Winter SG. (2006) Toward a neo-Schumpeterian theory of the firm. Indust. Corporate Change 15:125–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter SG, Cattani G, Dorsch A. (2007) The value of moderate obession: Insights from a new model of organizational search. Organ. Sci. 18:403–419.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M, Winter SG. (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13:339–351.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.