Decay, Shock, and Renewal: Operational Routines and Process Entropy in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0709

References

  • Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI. (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anand G, Ward PT, Tatikonda MV, Schilling DA. (2009) Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure. J. Oper. Management 27(6):444–461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L. (1982) Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(3):420–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L. (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D. (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R. (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J, Hesterly W. (2008) Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts, 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Becker MC. (2004) Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 13(4):643–677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker MC. (2008) Handbook of Organizational Routines. (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker MC, Lazaric N, Nelson RR, Winter SG. (2005) Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):775–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benkard CL. (2000) Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1034–1054.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bigley GA, Roberts K. (2001) The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1281–1299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brillouin L. (1953) Negentropy principle of information. J. Appl. Physics 24(9):1152–1163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brownstein J. (2010) FDA slams Tylenol maker's delay in tainted pill recall. ABC News (January 15) . http://goo.gl/ByfeM.Google Scholar
  • Capron L, Mitchell W. (1998) Bilateral resource redeployment and capabilities improvement following horizontal acquisitions. Indust. Corporate Change 7(3):453–484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clausius R. (1879) The Mechanical Theory of Heat. (Macmillan, London) . [Translated by W. R. Browne.] Google Scholar
  • Cohen MD. (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5):773–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G, Egidi M, Marengo L, Warglien M, Winter S. (1996) Routines and other recurring patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corporate Change 5(3):653–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole RE, Scott WR. (2000) The Quality Movement and Organizational Theory. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D. (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Holan PM, Phillips N. (2004) Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Sci. 50(11):1603–1613.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Economist, The. (2009) Toyota: Losing its shine. (December 12):75–78.Google Scholar
  • Edmondson AC. (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1419–1452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epple D, Argote L, Murphy K. (1996) An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper. Res. 44(1):77–86.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Farjoun M. (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farley D. (1993) Court decision strengthens FDA's regulatory power. FDA Consumer 27(7):40–41.Google Scholar
  • Feldman MS. (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell JH. (2002) Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. 48(11):1408–1426.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein D. (1997) Clashing paradigms? Total quality, financial restructuring, and theories of the firm. Indust. Corporate Change 6(3):665–700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant RM. (1996) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. 7(4):375–387.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gray JV, Roth AV, Leiblein MJ. (2011a) Quality risk in offshore manufacturing: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. J. Oper. Management 29(7–8):737–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray JV, Roth AV, Tomlin B. (2011b) Quality risk and contract manufacturing: Theory and empirical evidence. . Working paper, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  • Harris G, Wilson D. (2010) Glaxo to pay $750 million for sale of bad products. New York Times (October 26) . http://goo.gl/wTx7B.Google Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Rhee M. (2004) The role of volition in organizational learning: The case of automotive product recalls. Management Sci. 50(11):1545–1560.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hayek FA. (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 35(4):519–530.Google Scholar
  • Holmqvist M. (2004) Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organ. Sci. 15(1):70–81.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Milgrom P. (1994) The firm as an incentive system. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):972–991.Google Scholar
  • Homburg C, Bucerius M. (2005) A marketing perspective on mergers and acquisitions: How marketing integration affects postmerger performance. J. Marketing 69(1):95–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jemison DB, Sitkin SB. (1986) Corporate acquisitions: A process perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 11(1):145–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz D, Kahn RL. (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Knott AM. (2001) The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Sci. 47(3):430–448.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knott AM, McKelvey B. (1999) Nirvana efficiency: A comparative test of residual claims and routines. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(4):365–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson R, Finkelstein S. (1999) Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organ. Sci. 10(1):1–27.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, Rerup C. (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4):502–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lillrank P. (2003) The quality of standard, routine and nonroutine processes. Organ. Stud. 24(2):215–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loftus P, Kamp J. (2010) Glaxo to pay $750 million in pact; whistleblower due big payment. Wall Street Journal (October 27) . http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303341904575576463900844480.html.Google Scholar
  • MacDuffie JP. (1997) The road to “root cause”: Shop-floor problem-solving at three auto assembly plants. Management Sci. 43(4):497–502.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Macher JT, Mayo JW, Nickerson JA. (2011) Regulator heterogeneity and endogenous efforts to close the information asymmetry gap. J. Law Econom. 54(February):25–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA. (1958) Organizations. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Naveh E, Erez M. (2004) Innovation and attention to detail in the quality improvement paradigm. Management Sci. 50(11):1576–1586.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R, Winter S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Nohria N, Gulati R. (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management J. 39(5):1245–1264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W. (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pablo AL. (1994) Determinants of acquisition integration level: A decision-making perspective. Acad. Management J. 37(4):803–836.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Feldman MS. (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):793–815.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Reuter HH. (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. (1999) Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Poole MS, Van de Ven AH. (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):562–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prigogine I. (1962) Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics. (Interscience, New York).Google Scholar
  • Repenning NP, Sterman JD. (2002) Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):265–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C. (2009) Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organ. Sci. 20(5):876–893.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rockoff JD. (2010) Tylenol for kids returns to shelves. Wall Street Journal (November 18) . http://goo.gl/CISap.Google Scholar
  • Salvato C. (2009) Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ. Sci. 20(2):384–409.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salvato C, Rerup C. (2011) Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. J. Management 37(2):468–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scholz JT, Gray WB. (1990) OSHA enforcement and workplace injuries: A behavioral approach to risk assessment. J. Risk Uncertainty 3(3):283–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira Z. (2011) “I've got a theory paper—Do you?”: Conceptual, empirical, and theoretical contributions to knowledge in the organizational sciences. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1312–1321.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA. (1957) A behavioral model of rational choice. Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 241–260.Google Scholar
  • Sitkin SB, Sutcliffe KM, Schroeder RG. (1994) Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 19(3):537–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slevin DP, Covin JG. (1997) Time, growth, complexity, and transitions: Entrepreneurial challenges for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 22(2):53–68.Google Scholar
  • Snook SA. (2000) Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks Over Northern Iraq. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Spear SJ, Bowen HK. (1999) Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(5):97–106.Google Scholar
  • Sterman JD, Repenning NP, Kofman F. (1997) Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Sci. 43(4):503–521.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Su H-C, Linderman K. (2010) Sustaining high quality performance in an increasingly dynamic environment. . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  • Swanson GA, Bailey KD, Miller JG. (1997) Entropy, social entropy, and money: A living systems theory perspective. Systems Res. Behav. Sci. 14(1):45–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ton Z, Huckman RS. (2008) Managing the impact of employee turnover on performance: The role of process conformance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):56–68.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker AL, Edmondson AC. (2003) Why hospitals don't learn from failure: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. Calif. Management Rev. 45(2):55–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2004) Risk-based method for prioritizing cGMP inspections of pharmaceutical manufacturing sites—A pilot risk ranking model. . Report, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2007) Establishment Inspection Report (EIR). . Accessed December 28, 2010, http://www.fda.gov/iceci/inspections/fieldmanagementdirectives/ucm061430.htm.Google Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH. (1986) Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Sci. 32(5):590–607.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Verbeek M. (2000) A Guide to Modern Econometrics. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
  • Waxman HA. (2005) Prescription for harm: The decline in FDA enforcement activity. . Committee on Government Reform, Minority Staff, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Weick KE, Roberts KH. (1993) Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. 17(4):514–524.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weinger MB, Slagle J, Jain S, Ordonez N. (2003) Retrospective data collection and analytical techniques for patient safety studies. J. Biomed. Informatics 36(1–2):106–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whitehead AN. (1911) An Introduction to Mathematics. (Henry Holt and Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Winter SG. (1986) The research program of the behavioral theory of the firm: Orthodox critique and evolutionary perspective. , Gilad B, Kaish S, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Economics, Vol. A. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 155–188.Google Scholar
  • Yu J, Engelman RM, Van de Ven AH. (2005) The integration journey: An attention-based view of the merger and acquisition integration process. Organ. Stud. 26(10):1501–1528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.