Organizational Learning as Credit Assignment: A Model and Two Experiments

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0710

References

  • Argote L. (1993) Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system and environmental components. British J. Soc. Psych. 32(1):31–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L. (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Argote L, Epple D. (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Greve HR. (2007) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. 18(3):337–349.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D. (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R. (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R, Cohen M. (1999) Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bellman RE. (1957) Dynamic Programming. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Berthier N, Rosenstein M, Barto A. (2005) Approximate optimal control as a model for motor learning. Psych. Rev. 112(2):329–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA. (1988) Strategy making as a social learning process: The case of internal corporate venturing. Interfaces 18(3):74–85.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Busemeyer J. (2002) Dynamic decision making. , Smelser NJ, Baltes PB, eds. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 6. (Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK), 3903–3908.Google Scholar
  • Catrambone R. (1998) The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 27(4):355–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Catrambone R, Holyoak KJ. (1990) Learning subgoals and methods for solving probability problems. Memory Cognition 18(6):593–603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD. (1991) Individual learning and organizational routine. Organ. Sci. 2(1):135–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Bacdayan P. (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crossman E. (1959) A theory of the acquisition of speed-skill. Ergonomics 2(2):153–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Darr E, Argote L, Epple D. (1995) The acquisition, transfer and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, Fang C, Levinthal DA. (2004) From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning from model-based feedback. Management Sci. 50(10):1366–1378.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dixon P. (1987) The processing of organizational and component step information in written directions. J. Memory Language 26(1):24–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JM, Thomas A. (1984) Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):235–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fioretti G. (2007) The organizational learning curve. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177(3):1375–1384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu W-T, Anderson JR. (2006a) From recurrent choice to skilled learning: A reinforcement learning model. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 135(2):184–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu W-T, Anderson JR. (2006b) Solving the credit assignment problem: The interaction of explicit and implicit learning with internal and external state information. Proc. 28th Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. , (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 238–243.Google Scholar
  • Gallistel C, Fairhurst S, Balsam P. (2004) The learning curve: Implications of a quantitative analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(36):13124–13131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray W, Sims C, Fu W, Schoelles M. (2006) The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psych. Rev. 113(3):461–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR. (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulledge TR, Womer NK, Dorroh JR. (1984) Learning and costs in airframe production: A multiple output production function approach. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 31(1):67–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heathcote A, Brown S, Mewhort D. (2000) The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 7(2):185–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holland J. (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
  • Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE, Thagard PR. (1986) Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huberman B. (2001) The dynamics of organizational learning. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 7(2):145–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchins E. (1991) Organizing work by adaptation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):14–39.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaelbling L. (1993) Learning in Embedded Systems. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kantor PB, Zangwill WI. (1991) The theory of the learning rate budget. Management Sci. 37(3):315–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levin D. (2000) Organizational learning and the transfer of knowledge: An investigation of quality improvement. Organ. Sci. 11(6):630–647.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. (2001) Organizational capabilities in complex worlds. , Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. (Oxford University Press, New York), 363–389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, March JG. (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG. (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG. (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14 319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy FK. (1965) Adaptation in the production process. Management Sci. 11(6):B136–B154.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lovallo D. (1996) From individual biases to organizational errors. , Dosi G, Malerba F, eds. Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK), 103–123.Google Scholar
  • March JG. (1981) Footnotes to organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4):563–577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA. (1958) Organizations. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mazur J, Hastie R. (1978) Learning as accumulation: A reexamination of the learning curve. Psych. Bull. 85(6):1256–1274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minsky M. (1961) Steps towards artificial intelligence. Proc. Inst. Radio Engineers 49(1):8–30.Google Scholar
  • Muth JF. (1986) Search theory and the manufacturing progress function. Management Sci. 32(8):948–962.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R, Winter S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Pentland BT. (1992) Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):527–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perkins D. (2000) The Eureka Effect: The Art and Logic of Breakthrough Thinking. (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Phillips JL, Noelle DD. (2004) Reinforcement learning of dimensional attention for categorization. , Forbus KD, Gentner D, Regier T, eds. 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Sci. Soc., (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 1101–1106.Google Scholar
  • Rahmandad H. (2008) Effect of delays on complexity of organizational learning. Management Sci. 54(7):1297–1312.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D. (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Samuel AL. (1959) Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J. Res. Development 3(3):210–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuel AL. (1967) Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J. Res. Development 11(6):601–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling MA, Vidal P, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A. (2003) Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and organizational learning. Management Sci. 49(1):39–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shrager J, Hogg T, Huberman BA. (1988) A graph-dynamic model of the power law of practice and the problem-solving fan-effect. Science 242(4877):414–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA. (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):125–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton R, Barto A. (1998) Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Walsh JP, Ungson GR. (1991) Organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):57–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watkins C. (1989) Learning from delayed rewards. . Ph.D. thesis, Kings' College, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  • Weick KE. (1991) The nontraditional quality of organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):116–124.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.