Toward a Theory of Extended Contact: The Incentives and Opportunities for Bridging Across Network Communities

References

• Ahuja G. (2000a) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G. (2000b) The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management J. 21(3):317–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Polidoro F, Mitchell W. (2009) Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic Management J. 30(9):941–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Soda G, Zaheer A. (2012) The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. 23(2):434–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Albert R, Barabási A-L. (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Modern Phys. T4(1):47–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE. (1979) Organizations and Environments. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE. (1982) The origins and persistence of social networks. , Marsden PV, Lin N, eds. Social Structure and Network Analysis. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 281–293.Google Scholar
• Anand BN, Khanna T. (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. 21(3):295–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ. (1974) The Limits of Organization, 1st ed. (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Bae J, Gargiulo M. (2004) Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Acad. Management J. 47(6):843–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker WE. (1984) The social structure of a national securities market. Amer. J. Sociol. 89(4):775–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker WE, Faulkner RR. (1993) The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 58(6):837–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, McEvily B, Rowley TJ. (2012) Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organ. Sci. 23(2):529–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Shipilov AV, Rowley TJ. (2003) Where do small worlds come from? Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):697–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Chuang Y-T. (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):536–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Haunschild PR, Phillips DJ. (2004) Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. 15(3):259–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Belsey DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Fernandez-Mateo I. (2010) Relationship duration and returns to brokerage in the staffing sector. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1141–1158.Link, Google Scholar
• Blau PM. (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Blau PM. (1994) Structural Contexts of Opportunities. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Blau PM, Schwartz JE. (1984) Crosscutting Social Circles. (Academic Press, Orlando, FL).Google Scholar
• Bonacich P. (1972) Technique for analyzing overlapping memberships. , Costner H, ed. Sociological Methodology. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 176–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradach JL, Eccles RG. (1989) Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Rev. Sociol. 15 97–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Greenstein S. (1999) Technological competition and the structure of the computer industry. J. Indust. Econom. 47(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF. (1999) New modes of competition: Implications for the future structure of the computer industry. , Eisenach JA, Lenard TM, eds. Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace. (Kluwer, Norwell, MA), 155–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF. (2000) Competition co-operation, and predation in innovative industries. Proc. 3rd Nordic Competition Policy Conf.: Fighting Cartels—Why and How? (Konkurrensverket, Stockholm), 116–143.Google Scholar
• Burt RS. (1982) Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action. (Academic Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS. (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS. (2008) Information and structural holes: Comment on Reagans and Zuckerman. Indust. Corporate Change 17(5):953–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buskens V, Van de Rijt A. (2008) Dynamics of networks if everyone strives for structural holes. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(2):371–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T. (2003) Determinants of governance structures in alliances: The role of strategic, task, and partner uncertainties. Indust. Corporate Change 12(6):1223–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung S, Singh H, Lee K. (2000) Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 21(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ. (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51(4):661–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cook KS. (1977) Exchange and power in networks of interorganizational relationships. Sociol. Quart. 18(1):62–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danon L, Diaz-Guilera A, Duch J, Arenas A. (2005) Comparing community structure identification. J. Statist. Mech.: Theory Experiment (September):P09008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davies A, Brady T, Hobday M. (2007) Organizing for solutions: Systems seller vs. systems integrator. Indust. Marketing Management 36(2):183–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Yoo M, Baker WE. (2003) The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organ. 1(3):301–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JA. (1967) Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations 20(2):181–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedrick J, Kraemer KL. (2005) The impacts of IT on firm and industry structure: The personal computer industry. Calif. Management Rev. 47(3):122–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. (1992) Nadel's Paradox revisited: Relational and cultural aspects of organizational structure. , Nohria N, Eccies RG, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 118–142.Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doreian P. (1989) Models of network effects on social actors. , Freeman LC, White DR, Romney K, eds. Research Methods in Social Analysis. (George Mason University Press, Fairfax, VA), 295–317.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN. (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):84–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM. (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM. (1964) Power-dependence relations: Two experiments. Sociometry 27(3):282–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feld SL, Carter WC. (1998) When desegregation reduces interracial contact: A class size paradox for weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(5):1165–1186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Gould RV. (1994) A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(6):1455–1491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I. (2007) Who pays the price of brokerage? Transferring constraint through price setting in the staffing sector. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(2):291–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L, Schachter S, Burt KW. (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedkin NE. (1983) Horizons of observability and limits of informal control in organizations. Soc. Forces 62(1):54–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure. (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Girvan M, Newman MEJ. (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(12):7821–7826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomes-Casseres B, Hagedoorn J, Jaffe AB. (2006) Do alliances promote knowledge flows? J. Financal Econom. 80(1):5–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV, Fernandez RM. (1989) Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociol. Methodol. 19 89–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1 201–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS. (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greif A. (1989) Reputation and coalitions in medieval trade: Evidence on the Maghribi traders. J. Econom. History 49(4):857–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grove A. (1996) Only the Paranoid Survive. (HarperCollins Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Guimerà R, Amaral LAN. (2005) Cartography of complex networks: Modules and universal roles. J. Statist. Mech. Theory Experiment (February):P02001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guimerá R, Sales-Pardo M, Amaral LAN. (2004) Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 70 025101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4):619–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. (1999) Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 20(5):397–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Sytch M. (2007) Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on exchange performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):32–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Sytch M, Mehrotra P. (2008) Breaking up is never easy: Planning for exit in a strategic alliance. Calif. Management Rev. 50(4):147–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Sytch M, Tatarynowicz A. (2012) The rise and fall of small worlds: Exploring the evolutionary dynamics of social structure. Organ. Sci. 23(2):449–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J. (1993) Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management J. 14(5):371–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. . NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI. (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Beckman C. (1998) When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):815–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Miner AS. (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA. (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA, Hall B, Griliches Z. (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayek FA. (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 35(4):519–530.Google Scholar
• Hilbe JM. (2007) Negative Binomial Regression. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. (2003) The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks' entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):466–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim H, Hoskisson RE, Wan WP. (2004) Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms. Strategic Management J. 25(7):613–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoke D. (2009) Playing well together: Creating corporate social capital in strategic alliance networks. Amer. Behav. Scientist 52(12):1690–1708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B. (1988) Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management J. 9(4):319–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Walker G. (2001) The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(3):317–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kossinets G. (2006) Effects of missing data in social networks. Soc. Networks 28(3):247–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D. (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1187–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Rosenkopf L. (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):797–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GK. (2007) The significance of network resources in the race to enter emerging product markets: The convergence of telephony communications and computer networking, 1989–2001. Strategic Management J. 28(1):17–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li SX, Rowley TJ. (2002) Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among U.S. investment banks. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1104–1118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin N. (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln JR, Gerlach ML. (2004) Japan's Network Economy. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macy MW. (1990) Learning theory and the logic of critical mass. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 55(6):809–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F, Orsenigo L. (1996) The dynamics and evolution of industries. Indust. Corporate Change 5(1):51–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden PV, Friedkin NE. (1993) Network studies of social influence. Sociol. Methods Res. 22(1):127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Zaheer A. (1999) Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. 20(12):1133–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Jaffee J, Tortoriello M. (2012) Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organ. Sci. 23(2):547–563.Link, Google Scholar
• McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27 415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS. (1989) Similarity of political behavior among large American corporations. Amer. J. Sociol. 95(2):401–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS. (1992) The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS, Galaskiewicz J. (1993) Networks of interorganizational relationships. Sociol. Methods Res. 22(1):46–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS. (1998) Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Res. Policy 27(5):507–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ. (2004) Detecting community structure in networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 38(2):321–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ. (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103(23):8577–8582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D. (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW. (2004) Knowledge networks in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM. (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik G. (1978) The External Control of Organizations. (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Podolny J. (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):458–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A. (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter MA, Mucha PJ, Newman MEJ, Friend AJ. (2007) Community structure in the United States House of Representatives. Physica A 386(1):414–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW. (1996) Inter-organizational collaboration in the biotechnology industry. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. 152(1):197–215.Google Scholar
• Powell WW, White DR, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J. (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4):1132–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Greve HR, Davis GF. (2001) Fool's gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):502–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B. (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW. (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman E. (2008) Why knowledge does not equal power: The network redundancy trade-off. Indust. Corporate Change 17(5):904–944.Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B. (2004) How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1):101–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rogers WH. (1993) Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Tech. Bull. 13(May):19–23.Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Padula G. (2008) Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organ. Sci. 19(5):669–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Metiu A, George VP. (2001) From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):748–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT. (2001) Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. 22(6/7):687–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D. (2000) Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. 21(3):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryall MD, Sorenson O. (2007) Brokers and competitive advantage. Management Sci. 53(4):566–583.Link, Google Scholar
• Rytina S, Morgan DL. (1982) The arithmetic of social relations: The interplay of category and network. Amer. J. Sociol. 88(1):88–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik GR. (1995) Review essay—Wanted: A good network theory of organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):345–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schilling M. (2009) Understanding alliance data. Strategic Management J. 30(3):233–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M, Phelps CC. (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7):1113–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Shane SA. (1996) Hybrid organizational arrangements and their implications for firm growth and survival: A study of new franchisors. Acad. Management J. 39(1):216–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepherd C, Ahmed PK. (2000) From product innovation to solutions innovation: A new paradigm for competitive advantage. Eur. J. Innovation Management 3(2):100–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shipilov AV, Li SX. (2012) The missing link: The effect of customers on the formation of relationships among producers in the multiplex triads. Organ. Sci. 23(2):472–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Simmel G. (1955) Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE. (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1546–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE. (1998) Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(3):668–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD. (1967) Organizations in Action. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):674–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Spiro J. (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanneste BS, Puranam P. (2010) Repeated interactions and contractual detail: Identifying the learning effect. Organ. Sci. 21(1):186–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Vuong QH. (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57(2):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zajac EJ. (2007) Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1291–1317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ. (1999) Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(2):493–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. (1998) Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM. (1986) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. , Mullen G, Goethals G, eds. Theories of Group Behavior. (Springer-Verlag, New York), 185–208.Google Scholar
• Wellman B. (1979) The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. Amer. J. Sociol. 84(5):1201–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM. (1999) Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. J. Econometrics 90(1):77–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang H, Lin Z, Lin Y. (2010) A multilevel framework of firm boundaries: Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes. Strategic Management J. 31(3):237–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zachary WW. (1977) An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. J. Anthropol. Res. 33(4):452–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Bell GG. (2005) Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management J. 26(9):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Soda G. (2009) Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW. (2004) Structural incoherence and stock market activity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):405–432.Crossref, Google Scholar