Capabilities, Transaction Costs, and Firm Boundaries

References

• Amit R, Shoemaker PJH. (1993) Specialized assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management J. 14(1):33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand B, Khanna T. (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. 21(3):295–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N. (1996) Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management J. 17(2):129–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Mui V-L. (2007) Rules of engagement, credibility and the political economy of organizational dissent. Strategic Organ. 5(2):107–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Shane S. (2001) Entrepreneurs, contracts, and the failure of young firms. Management Sci. 47(3):337–358.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney JB. (1986) Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Sci. 32(10):1231–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney JB. (1988) Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):71–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB. (1999) How a firm's capabilities affect boundary decisions. Sloan Management Rev. 40(3):137–146.Google Scholar
• Barzel Y. (1982) Measurement cost and the organization of markets. J. Law Econom. 25(1):27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradach JL, Eccles RG. (1989) Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Rev. Sociol. 15 97–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Stuart HW. (1996) Value-based business strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 5(1):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Mitchell W. (1998) The role of acquisitions in reshaping business capabilities in the international telecommunications industry. Indust. Corporate Change 7(3):715–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter R, Hodgson G. (2006) The impact of empirical tests of transaction cost economics on the debate on the nature of the firm. Strategic Management J. 27(5):461–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y. (2005) Vertical disintegration. J. Econom. Management Strategy 14(1):209–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH. (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH. (1960) The problem of social cost. J. Law Econom. 3(October):1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW. (1999) When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organ. Sci. 10(2):119–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Collis DJ, Montgomery CA. (1995) Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Bus. Rev. 73(4):118–129.Google Scholar
• Coombs JG, Ketchen DJ. (1999) Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: Toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strategic Management J. 20(9):867–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H. (1988) The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 4(1):141–161.Google Scholar
• Diamond PA. (1981) Mobility costs, frictional unemployment and inefficiency. J. Political Econom. 89(4):798–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I, Cool K. (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1513.Link, Google Scholar
• Dow GK. (1987) The function of authority in transaction cost economics. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 8(1):13–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JE, Singh H. (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss K, Foss NJ. (2008) Understanding opportunity discovery and sustainable advantage: The role of transaction costs and property rights. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 207(2):191–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P. (2005) Strategy and the Business Landscape, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P, Nueno J. (2003) Zara: Fashion. . HBS Case 9-703-497, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P, Bradley S, Mark K. (2004) Wal-Mart stores in 2003. . HBS Case 9-704-430, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Gilson RJ, Sabel CF, Scott RE. (2009) Contracting for innovation: Vertical disintegration and interfirm collaboration. Columbia Law Rev. 109(3):431–502.Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD. (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J. (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helper S, MacDuffie JP, Sabel C. , (2000) Pragmatic collaborations: Advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism. Indust. Corporate Change 9(3):443–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G. (2005) How much you know versus how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technologically innovative component. Strategic Management J. 26(1):75–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Hitt LM. (2005) Losing sight of the forest for the trees? Productive capabilities and gains from trade as drivers of vertical scope. Strategic Management J. 26(13):1209–1227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Winter SG. (2005) The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26(5):395–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick D. (1995) AT&T has the plan. Fortune (October 16):84.Google Scholar
• Klein B, Crawford RG, Alchian AA. (1978) Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. 21(2):297–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut G, Zander U. (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut G, Zander U. (1996) What do firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Langlois RN. (1992) Transaction-cost economics in real time. Indust. Corporate Change 1(1):99–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Miller DJ. (2003) An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management J. 24(9):839–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, Rumelt RP. (2003a) A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management J. 24(11):1069–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, Rumelt RP. (2003b) The payments perspective: Micro-foundations of resource analysis. Strategic Management J. 24(10):903–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhok A. (2002) Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm, and the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 23(6):535–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, McGahan AM. (2007) The field of strategic management within the evolving science of organization. Strategic Organ. 5(1):79–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, Pandian JR. (1992) The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management J. 13(5) 363–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makowski L, Ostroy JM. (2001) Perfect competition and the creativity of the market. J. Econom. Literature 39(2):479–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masten SE, Meehan JW, Snyder EA. (1991) The costs of organization. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 7(1):265–273.Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Argyres NS. (2004) Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. 15(4):394–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J. (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J. (1995) Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2–3):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B. (1988) Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):623–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen DT, Pissarides CA. (1994) Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 61(3):397–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagarajan A, Mitchell W. (1998) Evolutionary diffusion: Internal and external methods used to acquire encompassing, complementary, and incremental technological changes in the lithotripsy industry. Strategic Management J. 19(11):1063–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR. (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Nickerson J, Zenger T. (2008) Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1429–1449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. (Cambridge University Press, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE. (2004) Learning versus protection in inter-firm alliances: A false dichotomy. , Mahnke V, Pedersen T, eds. Knowledge, Governance, and the Multinational Enterprise: Frontiers in International Management Research. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK) , 108–129.Google Scholar
• Penrose E. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) .Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA. (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3):179–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T. (1998) Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. 19(9):853–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW. (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behav. 12(1):295–336.Google Scholar
• Richardson GB. (1972) The organization of industry. Econom. J. 82(327):883–896.Google Scholar
• Ring PS, Van de Ven AH. (1992) Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management J. 13(7):483–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rukstad M, Collis D, Levine T. (2001) The Walt Disney Company: The entertainment king. . HBS Case 701-035, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP. (1984) Towards a strategic theory of the firm. , Lamb R, ed. Competitive Strategic Management. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) , 556–570.Google Scholar
• Shubik M. (1982) Game Theory in the Social Sciences, Vol. I. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
• Sobrero M, Roberts EB. (2001) The trade-off between efficiency and learning in interorganizational relationships for product development. Management Sci. 47(4):493–511.Link, Google Scholar
• Tait N. (1999) Spin-off may provide more opportunities in supplies. Financial Times (March 1):2.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ. (1982) Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(1):39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ. (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. (1999) Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. 20(12):1087–1108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wired (2004) Pixar says “so long” to Disney. (January 29) . http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2004/01/62104.Google Scholar
• Wolter C, Velasco F. (2008) The effects of innovation on vertical structure: Perspectives on transaction costs and competences. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):586–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Bazerman MH. (1991) Blind spots in industry and competitor analysis: Implications of interfirm (mis)perceptions for strategic decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac E, Olsen C. (1993) From transaction cost to transaction value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. J. Management Stud. 30(1):131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger TR. (1994) Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Management Sci. 40(6):708–729.Link, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Amit R. (2006) How do firm specificity and asset specificity differ? Implications for the choice of firm boundaries. . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar