Politics and Firm Boundaries: How Organizational Structure, Group Interests, and Resources Affect Outsourcing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0772

References

  • Aghion P, Tirole J. (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison G, Zellikow P. (1999) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2nd ed. (Addison Wesley Longman, New York).Google Scholar
  • Anderson E. (1988) Strategic implications of Darwinian economics for selling efficiency and choice of integrated or independent sales forces. Management Sci. 34(5):599–618.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. (1996) Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management J. 17(2):129–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres NS. (2009) Internal organization from a transaction cost perspective. , Nickerson JA, Silverman BS, eds. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 26 (Emerald Group Publishing), Bingley, UK), 221–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N, Bigelow L. (2007) Does transaction misalignment matter for firm survival at all stages of the industry life cycle? Management Sci. 53(8):1332–1344.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres NS, Liebeskind JP. (1999) Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):49–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres NS, Silverman BS. (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):929–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ. (2002) Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):39–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. (1991) The resource-based model of the firm: Origins, implications, and prospects. J. Management 17(1):97–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bidwell M. (2009) Do peripheral workers do peripheral work? Comparing the use of highly skilled contractors and regular employees. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 62(2):200–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bidwell M. (2010) Problems deciding: How the make-or-buy decision leads to transaction misalignment. Organ. Sci. 21(2):362–379.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bradach JL. (1997) Using the plural form in the management of restaurant chains. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):276–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA. (1994) Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):24–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP. (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corts KS, Singh J. (2004) The effect of repeated interaction on contract choice: Evidence from offshore drilling. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 20(1):230–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crocker KJ, Reynolds KJ. (1993) The efficiency of incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis of Air Force engine procurement. RAND J. Econom. 24(1):126–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crozier M. (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd ed. (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  • Dean JW, Sharfman MP. (1996) Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 39(2):368–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dessein W, Garicano L, Gertner R. (2010) Organizing for synergies. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. 2(4):77–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dow GK. (1987) The function of authority in transaction cost economics. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 8(1):13–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer WG, Wilkins AL. (1991) Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):613–619.Google Scholar
  • Eccles RG, White HC. (1988) Price and authority in inter-profit center transactions. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement):S17–S51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Bourgeois LJ. (1988) Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. 31(4):737–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith JR. (1974) Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces 4(3):28–36.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W. (2007) Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School's past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R. (1999) Taking Coase seriously. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):145–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia DA, Thomas JB. (1996) Institutional identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):370–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodstein J, Boeker W, Stephan J. (1996) Professional interests and strategic flexibility: A political perspective on organizational contracting. Strategic Management J. 17(7):577–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gresov C, Stephens C. (1993) The context of interunit influence attempts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(2):252–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman SJ, Hart OD. (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B. (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B. (1999) Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(1):169–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Milgrom P. (1994) The firm as an incentive system. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):972–991.Google Scholar
  • Jacobides MG, Billinger S. (2006) Designing the boundaries of the firm: From “make, buy, or ally” to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organ. Sci. 17(2):249–261.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobides MG, Hitt LM. (2005) Losing sight of the forest for the trees? Productive capabilities and gains from trade as drivers of vertical scope. Strategic Management J. 26(13):1209–1227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joskow PL. (1985) Vertical integration and long-term contracts: The case of coal-burning electric generating plants. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 1(1):33–80.Google Scholar
  • Kalnins A, Mayer KJ. (2004) Relationships and hybrid contracts: An analysis of contract choice in information technology. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 20(1):207–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S. (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klein PG. (2005) The make-or-buy decisions: Lessons from empirical studies. , Ménard C, Shirley MM, eds. Handbook of New Institutional Economics (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), 435–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacity MC, Hirschheim R. (1993) Information Systems Outsourcing: Myths, Metaphors and Realities (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
  • Langlois RN, Foss NJ. (1999) Capabilities and governance: The rebirth of production in the theory of economic organization. Kyklos 52(2):201–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW. (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Division of Research, Harvard Business School, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Macher JT, Richman BD. (2008) Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics 10(1) . doi:10.2202/1469-3569.1210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Makadok R, Coff R. (2009) Both market and hierarchy: An incentive-system theory of hybrid governance forms. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2):297–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG. (1962) The business firm as a political coalition. J. Politics 24(4):662–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG. (1994) A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA. (1958) Organizations, 2nd ed. (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Markham SK. (2000) Corporate championing and antagonism as forms of political behavior: An R&D perspective. Organ. Sci. 11(4):429–447.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Masten SE. (1988) A legal basis for the firm. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 4(1):181–198.Google Scholar
  • Masten SE, Crocker KJ. (1985) Efficient adaptation in long-term contracts: Take-or-pay provisions for natural gas. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(5):1083–1093.Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J. (1988) An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement): S154–S179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. (1983) Power In and Around Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Monteverde K, Teece DJ. (1982) Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry. Bell J. Econom. 13(1):206–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Silverman BS. (2003) Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):433–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S, Stern S. (2008) How does outsourcing affect performance dynamics? Evidence from the automobile industry. Management Sci. 54(12):1963–1979.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W. (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew AM. (1973) The Politics of Organizational Decision-Making (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J. (1981) Power in Organizations (Pitman Publishing, Marshfield, MA).Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Poppo L, Zenger T. (1998) Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. 19(9):853–877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell TC, Lovallo D, Fox CR. (2011) Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1369–1386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Radner R. (1986) The internal economy of large firms. Econom. J. 96(Supplement):1–22.Google Scholar
  • Rajan RG, Zingales L. (1998) Power in a theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 113(2):387–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J. (2004) The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shelanski HA, Klein PG. (1995) Empirical research in transaction cost economics: A review and assessment. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 11(2):335–361.Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N. (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe AL. (1990) Organizing information outside the firm: Contracts as hierarchical documents. Information and Organizations (University of California Press, Berkeley), 194–239.Google Scholar
  • Strauss AL, Corbin JM. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Thompson JD. (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Vaast E, Levina N. (2006) Multiple faces of codification: Organizational redesign in an IT organization. Organ. Sci. 17(2):190–201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Voyer JJ. (1994) Coercive organizational politics and organizational outcomes: An interpretive study. Organ. Sci. 5(1):72–85.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walker G, Poppo L. (1991) Profit centers, single-source suppliers, and transaction costs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(1):66–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson OE. (1981) The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes. J. Econom. Literature 19(4):1537–1568.Google Scholar
  • Williamson OE. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Williamson OE. (1988) The logic of economic organization. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 4(1):65–93.Google Scholar
  • Williamson OE. (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter SG. (1988) On Coase, competence, and the corporation. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 4(1):163–180.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.