Top Management Team Heterogeneity: Personality, Power, and Proxies

References

• Amason A. C. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(1):123–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansoff H. I. Comment on Henry Mintzberg's rethinking strategic planning. Long Range Planning (1994) 27(3):31–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athanassiou N., Nigh D. The impact of U.S. company internationalization on top management team advice networks: A tacit knowledge perspective. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:83–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bantel K. A., Jackson S. E. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:107–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer J. M., Chattopadhyay P., George E., Glick W. H., Ogilvie D. T., Pugliese D. The selective perception of managers revisited. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(3):716–737Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W. Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(1):152–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresser R. K., Bishop R. C. Dysfunctional effects of formal planning: Two theoretical explanations. Acad. Management Rev. (1983) 8:588–599Google Scholar
• Brews P. J., Hunt M. R. Learning to plan and planning to learn: Resolving the planning school/learning school debate. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(10):889–913Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P., Glick W. H., Miller C. C., Huber G. P. Determinants of executive beliefs: Comparing functional conditioning and social influence. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:763–789Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J. Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology (1972) 6:1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Bourgeois L. J. Politics of strategic decision making in high velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(4):737–770Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures 1978-1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:504–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S. Managerial orientations and organizational outcomes: The moderating roles of managerial discretion and power. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. (1988) (Columbia University, New York) Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S., Hambrick D. C. Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of strategic discretion. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:484–503Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S., Hambrick D. C. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. (1996) (West Publishing Company, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN) Google Scholar
• Gough H. G. The adjective checklist as a personality assessment research technique. Psych. Rep. (1960) 6(2):107–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halebian J., Finkelstein S. Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(4):844–863Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Geletkanycz M. A., Frederickson J. W. Top management commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:401–418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):193–206Google Scholar
• Harrison D. S., Price K. H., Bell M. P. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(1):96–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard R., Vetter D. E., Little E. L. Replication in strategic management: Scientific testing for validity, generalizability, and usefulness. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(3):243–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iaquinto A. L., Frederickson J. W. Top management team agreement about the strategic decision process: A test of some of its determinants consequences. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:63–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jelinek M., Schoonhoven C. The innovation marathon: Lessons from high technology firms. (1990) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Keck S. L. Top management team structure: Differential effects by environmental context. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(2):143–156Link, Google Scholar
• Keck S. L., Tushman M. L. Environmental and organizational context and executive team structure. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1314–1344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight D., Pearee C. L., Smith K. G., Olian J. D., Sims H. P., Smith K. A., Flood P. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:445–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishan H. A., Miller A., Judge W. Q. Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams? Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(5):361–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lebart L., Morineau A., Warwick K. Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis. (1984) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Michel J. G., Hambrick D. C. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(1):9–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C. Organizational Strategy Structure, and Process. (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Miller C. C., Burke L. M., Glick W. H. Cognitive diversity among upper echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:39–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller C. C., Cardinal L. B. Strategic planning and firm performance: A synthesis of more than two decades of research. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(6):1649–1665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Sci. (1991) 37:34–52Link, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Friesen P. H. Organizations: A Quantum View. (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. Rethinking strategic planning, part 1: Pitfalls and fallacies. Long Range Planning (1994) 27(3):12–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray A. I. Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:125–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Caldwell D. F., Barnett W. P. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:21–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Flatt S. F. Executive team demography, organizational innovation, and firm performance. (1989) (Working paper, University of California, Berkley, CA) Google Scholar
• Overall J. E., Klett C. J. Applied Multivariate Analysis. (1972) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Pearce J. A., Freeman E. B., Robinson R. B. The tenuous link between formal strategic planning and financial performance. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(4):658–675Google Scholar
• Pitcher P. The Drama of Leadership. (1997) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Priem R. L. Top management team group factors, consensus, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11(6):469–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priem R. L. Executive judgment, organizational congruence, and firm performance. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(3):421–437Link, Google Scholar
• Sambharya R. B. Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of U.S. multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal (1996) 17(9):739–746Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith K. G., Smith K. A., Olian J. D., Sims H. P., O'Bannon D. P., Scully J. A. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:412–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stimpert J. L., Duhaime I. M. Seeing the big picture: The influence of industry, diversification, and business strategy on performance. Academy of Management Journal (1997) 40(3):560–583Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe K. M. What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(5):1360–1378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Romanelli E., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. (1985) 7(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 171–222Research in Organizational BehaviorGoogle Scholar
• Tyler B. B., Steensma H. K. The effects of executives' experiences and perceptions of their assessment of potential technological alliances. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:939–965Crossref, Google Scholar
• West C. T., Schwenk C. R. Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance: A report of resounding non-findings. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:571–576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema M. F., Bantel K. A. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(1):91–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema M. F., Bantel K. A. Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:485–504Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger T. R., Lawrence B. S. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:353–376Crossref, Google Scholar