Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development

References

  • Abbey A. Technological Innovation: R&D Work Environment. (1982) (Ann Arbor, MI) Google Scholar
  • Abernathy W. J., Clark K. B. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy (1985) 14:3–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler P. S., Borys B. Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:61–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken M., Bacharach S. B., French J. L. Organizational structure, work process, and proposal making in administrative bureaucracies. Acad. Management J. (1980) 23:631–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken M., Hage J. Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1968) 33:912–930CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen M. J., Yen W. M. Introduction to Measurement Theory. (1979) (Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Monterey, CA) Google Scholar
  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Allen T. J., Lee D. M. S., Tushman M. L. R&D performance as a function of internal communication, project management, and the nature of work. IEEE Trans. Eng. Management (1980) 27:2–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T. J., Tushman M. L., Lee D. M. S. Modes of technology transfer as a function of position in the spectrum from research through development to technical services. Acad. Management J. (1979) 22:694–708CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Org. Sci. (1992) 3:321–341LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arvey R. D.Fairness in Selecting Employees (1979) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bailyn L. Autonomy in the industrial R&D lab. Human Resource Management (1985) 24:129–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banbury C. M., Mitchell W. The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:161–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bantel K. A., Jackson S. E. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:107–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barker J. R. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:408–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belsley D. A., Kuh E., Welsch R. E.Regression Diagnostics (1980) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettis R. A., Hall W. K. Diversification strategy, accounting determined risk, and accounting determined return. Acad. Management J. (1982) 25:265–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnbaum-More P. H. New product development time: A cross-national study. Final Report, Center for Innovation Management Studies. (1993) (Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA) Google Scholar
  • Blau P., Scott R.Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach (1962) (Chandler Publishing Company, San Francisco, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bound J., Cummins C., Griliches Z., Hall B. H., Jaffe A., Griliches Z. Who does R&D and who patents? Patents and Productivity (1984) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 21–54Google Scholar
  • Boya U. O. Some issues in measures of predictor variable importance based in orthogonal decompositions in multiple regressions. AMA Proc. (1981) (American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL) 306–308Google Scholar
  • Burgelman R. A., Sayles L. R.Inside Corporate Innovation: Strategy, Structure, and Managerial Skills (1986) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Business Week Business Week R&D Scoreboard. (1993) June 28):102–104Google Scholar
  • Buzzell R. D.The World Pharmaceutical Industry: Prospects for the 1980s (1983) (Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA) . #9-583-168, HBS ServicesGoogle Scholar
  • Cardinal L. B., Lei D., Beyerlein M. M., Johnson D. A., Beyerlein S. T. Structuring research and development teams in the technological conversion process. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams (2000) 5(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 31–62Google Scholar
  • Cardinal L. B., Opler T. C. Corporate diversification and innovative efficiency: An empirical study. J. Accounting and Econom. (1995) 19:365–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cardinal L. B., Sitkin S. B., Long C. P. Mixing oil and water: Sequencing control system adaptation to create effective control. (1999) (Paper presented at the Strategic Management Society, Berlin, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Chen M. J., Farh J. L., MacMillan I. C. An exploration of the expertness of outside informants. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:1614–1632CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal R. C., Schmalensee R., Willig R. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) 2(Elsevier Science, New York) 1060–1107Google Scholar
  • Cool K. Strategic group formation and strategic group shifts: A longitudinal analysis of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, 1963-1982. (1985) (Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN) . Unpublished doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
  • Cool K., Schendel D. Strategic group formation and performance: The case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, 1963-1982. Management Sci. (1987) 33:1102–1124LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:555–590CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D., Donaldson L. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22:20–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dewar R. D., Dutton J. E. The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. (1986) 32:1422–1433LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewar R. D., Werbel J. Universalities and contingency predictions of employee satisfaction and conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:426–448CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Sci. (1992) 3:179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Duncan R., Kilmann R. H., Pondy L. R., Slevin D. P. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization Design (1976) 1(North-Holland, New York)167–188Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Sci. (1985) 31:134–149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ettlie J. E., Bridges W. P., O'Keefe R. D. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Sci. (1984) 30:682–695LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fava J. L., Velicer W. F. An empirical comparison of factor, image, component, and scale scores. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (1992) 27:301–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman C.The Economics of Industrial Innovation (1982) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Friedson E. The changing nature of professional control. Ann. Rev. Soc. (1984) 10:1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frone M. R. Regression models for discrete and limited dependent variables. RM Forum (1997) 2:3–6Google Scholar
  • Gambardella A. Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s. Res. Policy (1992) 21:391–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gardener W., Mulvey E. P., Shaw E. C. Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psych. Bull. (1995) 118:392–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glick W. H., Huber G. P., Miller C. C., Doty H. D., Sutcliffe K. S. Studying changes in organizational design and effectiveness: Retrospective event histories and periodic assessments. Org. Sci. (1990) 1:293–312LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Golden B. R. The past is the past--or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:848–860CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gomez-Mejia L. R., Tosi H., Hinkin T. Managerial control, performance, and executive compensation. Acad. Management J. (1987) 30:51–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Govindarajan V., Gupta A. K. Linking control systems to business unit strategy: Impact on performance. Accounting, Organ. and Society (1985) 10:51–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graves S. B., Langowitz N. S. Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:593–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hage J., Dewar R. Elite values versus organizational structure in predicting innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1973) 18:279–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall R. H. Professionalization and bureaucratization. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1968) 33:92–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J., Griliches Z., Hall B. H. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica (1984) 52:909–938CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. M. The evolution of integrative capability: Innovation in cardiovascular drug discovery. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3(3):607–630CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. M., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:63–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. R. Managerial incentives--a dynamic perspective. Essays in Honors of Lars Wahlbeck (1982) (Swedish School of Economics, Helsinki, Finalnd) Google Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. R. Agency costs and innovation. J. Econom. Behavior and Organ. (1989) 12:305–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howell J. M., Higgins C. A. Champions of technological innovations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:317–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., Miller C. C., Glick W. H. Developing more encompassing theories about organizations: The centralization-effectiveness relationship as an example. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1:11–40LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., Power D. J. Retrospective reports of strategic level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management J. (1987) 6:171–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ivancevich J. M. Contrast effects in performance evaluation and reward practices. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:465–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaeger A. M., Baliga B. R. Control systems and strategic adaptation: Lessons from the japanese experience. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6:115–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaworski B. J. Toward a theory of marketing control: Environmental context, control types, and consequences. J. Marketing (1988) 52:23–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jelinek M., Schoonhoven C. B.Innovation Marathon: Lessons From High Technology Firms (1990) (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kaluzny A. D., Veney J. E., Gentry J. T. Innovation of health services: A comparative study of hospitals and health departments. Health and Society (1974) 52:51–82Google Scholar
  • Katz R. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:81–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R. High performance research teams. Managing Professionals in Innovative Organizations (1988) (Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Katz R., Tushman M. L. Communication patterns, project performance and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation and integration in an R&D setting. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1979) 23:139–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R., Tushman M. L. An investigation into the managerial roles and career paths of gatekeepers and project supervisors in a major R&D facility. R&D Management (1981) 11:103–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R., Tushman M. L. A longitudinal study of the effects of boundary spanning supervision on turnover and promotion in research and development. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:437–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller R. T. Technology-information professing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:167–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller R. T., Holland W. E. Communicators and innovators in research and development organizations. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:742–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr J. L. Diversification strategies and managerial rewards: An empirical investigation. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28:155–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khandwalla P. N.The Design of Organizations (1974) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Kimberly J. R., Evanisko M. J. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors in hospital adoption of technical and administrative innovations. Acad. Management J. (1981) 24:689–713CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King G. Statistical models for political science event counts: Bias in conventional procedures and evidence for the exponential Poisson regression model. Amer. J. Political Sci. (1988) 32:838–863CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch L. J. The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:1–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kopelman R. E. Organizational control responsiveness, expectancy theory constructs and work motivation. Personnel Psych. (1976) 29:205–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotter J. P., Schlesinger L. A., Sathe V., Irwin Richard D.Organization: Text, Cases, and Readings on the Management of Organizational Design (1979) 25(Homewood, IL)Google Scholar
  • Langfield-Smith K. Management control systems and strategy: A critical review. Accounting, Organ. and Society (1997) 22:207–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lebas M., Weigenstein J. Management control: The roles of rules, markets, and culture. J. Management Stud. (1986) 23:259–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee D. M., Allen T. J. Integrating new technical staff: Implications for acquiring new technology. Management Sci. (1982) 28:1405–1420LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levy R. A.Pharmaceutical Research: Therapeutic and Economic Value of Incremental Innovations (1990) (National Pharmaceutical Council, Reston, VA) Google Scholar
  • Makhija M. V., Ganesh U. The relationship between control and partner learning in learning-related joint ventures. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:508–527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mason C. H., Perreault W. D. Multicollinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28:268–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonough E. F., Leifer R. Using simultaneous structures to cope with uncertainty. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:727–735CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merchant K. A.Control in Business Organizations (1985) (Pitman, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Miller C. C., Cardinal L. B., Glick W. H. Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:189–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. T.The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. T.Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations (1983) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Newman J. E. Development of a measure of perceived work environment. Acad. Management J. (1977) 20:520–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisbett R. E., Wilson T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psych. Rev. (1977) 814:231–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nord W. R., Tucker S.Implementing Routine and Radical Innovations (1987) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Northrup H. R., Malin M. E.Personnel Policies for Engineers and Scientists: An Analysis of Major Corporate Practice (1985) (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22:95–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:833–848Google Scholar
  • Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technological change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res. Policy (1984) 13:343–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavitt K., Pettigrew A. Comment on Tushman and Anderson. The Management of Strategic Change (1986) (Oxford, UK)Google Scholar
  • Pavitt K. What we know about the strategic management of technology. California Management Rev. (1990) 32:17–26Google Scholar
  • Pelz D. C., Andrews F. M.Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development (1976) (Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) Google Scholar
  • Pharmaceutical Council PanelThe Competitive Status of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry (1983) (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
  • Pharmaceutical Manufacturers AssociationAmerica's Pharmaceutical Research Companies: A Cost Effective Source of Important New Medicines (1989) NovemberGoogle Scholar
  • Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaPhRMA Annual Survey (1997) Google Scholar
  • Ravenscraft D. J., Long W. F., Kaplan S. N. Paths to creating value in pharmaceutical mergers. Mergers and Productivity (1999) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) . NBERGoogle Scholar
  • Reimann B. G. On the dimensions of bureaucratic structure: An empirical reappraisal. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1973) 18:462–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth N. L., Sitkin S. B., House A., Sitkin S. B., Bies R. J. Stigma as determinant of legalization. The Legalistic Organization (1994) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Roussel P. A., Saad K. N., Erickson T. J.Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Senker J., Faulkner W. Industrial use of public sector research in advanced technologies: A comparison of biotechnology and ceramics. R&D Management (1992) 22:157–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior (1992) 14:231–266Google Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Sutcliffe K. M. Dispensing legitimacy: The influence of professional, organizational, and legal controls on pharmacists behavior. Res. Soc. Organ. (1991) 8:269–295Google Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Sutcliffe K. M., Schroeder R. G. Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19:537–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snell S. A. Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:1–36Google Scholar
  • Sobek D. K., Liker J. K., Ward A. C. Another look at how Toyota integrates product development. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 76:36–48Google Scholar
  • Spilker B.Multinational Drug Companies: Issues in Drug Discovery and Development (1989) (Raven Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Taggart J.The World Pharmaceutical Industry (1993) (Routledge, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Taylor F. W.The Principles of Scientific Management (1911) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
  • Teitelman R., Baldo A. Grading R&D. Financial World (1989) January 24):22–24Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L. Communication across organizational boundaries: Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22:587–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L. Work characteristics and solo unit communication structure: A contingency analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:82–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Industry Outlook (1986) JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Ferry D. L.Measuring and Assessing Organizations (1980) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wanous J. P.Organizational Entry: Recruitment, Selection and Socialization of Newcomers (1980) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Weiss A. R., Birnbaum P. H. Technological infrastructure and the implementation of technological strategies. Management Sci. (1989) 35:1014–1026LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wiersema M. F., Bantel K. A. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:91–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zaltman G., Holbek R., Duncan J.Innovation and Organizations (1973) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zanzi A. How organic is your organization?--Determinants of organic/mechanistic tendencies in a public accounting firm. J. Management Stud. (1987) 24:125–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.