An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation

References

• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:321–341Link, Google Scholar
• Ansoff H. I., Stewart J. M. Strategies for technology-based business. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1967) 45(6):71–83Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Scott J., Overton Terry S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 14:396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K. Market orientation and innovation. J. Bus. Res. (1996a) 35:93–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K. The influence of innovation orientation in human resource management on new product development: The moderating role of innovation type. J. Market Focused Management (1996b) 1:87–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett, Rogers C., Cooper Robert C. The misuse of marketing: An American tragedy. Bus. Horizons (1981) 25:51–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Sci. (1983) 29:1349–1364Link, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(3):239–262Link, Google Scholar
• Calantone, Roger J., di Benedetto C. A., Bhoovaraghavan S. Examining the relationship between degree of innovation and new product success. J. Bus. Res. (1994) 30:143–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child D. Organization structure, environments and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology (1972) 6:1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakravarthy B. S. Adaptation: A promising metaphor for strategic management. Acad. Management Rev. (1982) 7:35–44Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M., Bower J. L. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conant J. S., Mokwa M. P., Varadarajan P. R. Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures-based study. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:365–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Covin, Jeffrey G. Entrepreneurial versus conservative firms: A comparison of strategies and performance. J. Management Stud. (1991) 28:439–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Covin, Jeffrey G., Slevin Dennis P. The influence of organizational structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. J. Management Stud. (1988) 23(3):217–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Covin, Jeffrey G., Slevin Dennis P. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:75–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denison D. R., Mishra A. K. Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):204–223Link, Google Scholar
• Deshpande R., Farley J. U., Webster F. E. Corporate culture, customer orientation and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. J. Marketing (1993) 57:23–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess, Gregory G., Lumpkin G. T., Covin J. G. Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(9):677–695Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drazin R., Schoonhoven C. B. Community, population, and organization effects on innovation: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:1065–1083Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foxall, Gordon R.Corporate Innovation: Marketing and Strategy (1984) (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent, UK) Google Scholar
• Fry L. W., Smith D. A. Congruence, contingency, and theory building. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12:117–132Google Scholar
• Gatignon, Hubert, Jean-Marc Xuereb. Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34:77–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, Ari, Venkataraman N. Investing in new information technology: The role of competitive posture and issue diagnosis. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:37–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamel G., Prahalad C. K.Competing For the Future. (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Hart, Stuart L. An integrative framework for strategy-making processes. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(2):327–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hulme, David. The sharp end of innovation. Asia Bus. (1995) February):6–7Google Scholar
• Hunt S. D., Morgan R. M. The competitive advantage theory of competition. J. Marketing (1995) 59:1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski, Bernard J., Kohli Ajay K. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing (1993) 57:53–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karagozoglu N., Brown W. B. Adaptive responses by conservative and entrepreneurial firms. J. Product Innovation Management (1988) 5:269–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khandawalla P. N. Some top management styles, their context and performance. Organ. and Admin. Sci. (1976/1977) 7:21–51Google Scholar
• Khandawalla P. N.The Design of Organizations. (1977) (Harcourt Rinehart, and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
• Kohli Ajay K., Jaworski Bernard J. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J. Marketing (1990) 54:1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli Ajay K., Jaworski Bernard J., Ajith Kumar. MARKOR: A measure of market orientation. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30:463–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The learning myopia. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumpkin G. T., Dess G. G. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(1):135–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Martin J. Ignore your customers. Fortune (1995) May 1):87–90Google Scholar
• Manu, Franklyn A. Innovation orientation, environment and performance: A comparison of U.S. and European markets. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1992) 23:333–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCabe D. L., Narayanan V. K. The life cycle of PIMS and BCG models. Indust. Marketing Management (1991) 20:347–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKee D. O., Varadarajan P. R., Pride W. M. Strategic adaptability and firm performance: A market-contingent perspective. J. Marketing (1989) 53:21–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles, Morgan P., Arnold D. R. The relationship between marketing orientation and entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (1991) 15:49–65Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Miller D. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Sci. (1983) 29:770–791Link, Google Scholar
• Moorman C. Organizational market information process: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32:318–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris, Michael H., Paul Gordon W. The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms. J. Bus. Venturing (1987) 2(3):247–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray J. A. Marketing is home for the entrepreneurial process. Indust. Marketing Management (1981) 10(2):93–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narver, John C., Slater Stanley F. The effect of a market orientation on business performance. J. Marketing (1990) 54:20–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olleros, Francisco J. Emerging industries and the burnout pioneers. J. Product Innovation Management (1986) 3:5–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P., Organ D. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12:531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell T. Organizational alignment as competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:119–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Bettis R. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:485–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rick P. The organizational taxonomy: Definition and design. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17:758–781Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Robert, Rosnow Ralph L.Contrasts Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance. (1985) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
• Ruekert, Robert W. Developing a market orientation: A organisational strategy perspective. Internat. J. Res. in Marketing (1992) 9:225–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schuler R. S. Fostering and facilitating entrepreneurship in organizations: Implications for organization structure and human resource management practices. Human Resource Management (1986) 25:607–629Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schuler R. S., Jackson S. E. Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. Acad. Management Executive (1987) 13:207–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slater, Stanley F., Narver John C. Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? J. Marketing (1994) 58:46–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slater, Stanley F., Narver John C. Market orientation and the learning organization. J. Marketing (1995) 59:63–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas A. S., Litshert R. J., Ramaswamy K. The performance impact of strategy-manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:509–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkataraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward a verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:423–444Google Scholar
• Workman, John P. Marketing’s limited role in new product development in one computer systems firm. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30:405–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra, Sharker A. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and company performance: A taxonomic approach. J. Bus. Venturing (1993) 8:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra, Sharker A., Covin J. G. Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:451–478Crossref, Google Scholar