The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation

References

• Anderson J. C. An approach for confirmatory measurement and structural equation modeling of organizational properties. Management Sci. (1987) 33(4):525–541Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103(3):411–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attewell P. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):1–19Link, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P.Causal Models in Marketing (1980) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Beath C. M., Orlikowski W. J. The contradictory implications in structure of systems development methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-user relationship in information engineering. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(4):350–377Link, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M. Comparative fit indices in structural model. Psych. Bull. (1990) 107:238–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen K. A., Stine R. A. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Soc. Methods Res. (1992) 21(2):205–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown A. W., Carney D. J., Morris E. J., Smith D. B., Zarrella P. F.Principles of CASE Tool Integration (1994) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Browne M. W., Cudeck R., Bollen K. A., Long J. S. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing Structural Equation Models (1993) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 136–162Google Scholar
• Bruce T., Fuller J., Moriarty T. So want a repository? Database Programming and Design (1989) 2(5):60–69Google Scholar
• Chin W. Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(1):VII–XVIGoogle Scholar
• Chin W., Marcolin P. L., Newsted P. R., Jarvenpaa S. L., Srinivasan A., DeGross J. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption study. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1996) (ACM Press, New York) 21–41Google Scholar
• Cooper R. B., Zmud R. W. Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):123–139Link, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003Link, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H., Williamson O. E., Winter S. G. The theory of the firm revisited. The Nature of the Firm (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) 159–178Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G. L., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Dixon R. L.Winning with CASE: Managing Modern Software Development (1992) (McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Feuche M. Implementing CASE? Learn from the users. MIS Week (1989) September 18Google Scholar
• Fichman R. G., Kemerer C. F. The assimilation of software process innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Sci. (1997) 43(10):1345–1363Link, Google Scholar
• Finlay P. N., Mitchell A. C. Perceptions of the benefits from the introduction of CASE: An empirical study. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(4):353–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Bookstein F. L. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Marketing Res. (1982) XIX(November):440–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forte G., Norman R. J. CASE: A self-assessment by the software engineering community. Comm. ACM. (1992) 35(Apr):28–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C. J. G., Hackman J. R. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Process (1990) 47:65–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ginzberg M. J. Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: Promising results and unanswered questions. Management Sci. (1981) 27:459–478Link, Google Scholar
• Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):213–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S. Exchanging best practices through computer-aided systems. Acad. Management Executive (1996) X(2):7–19Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996a) 17:109–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996b) 7:375–387Link, Google Scholar
• Hackathorn R. D., Karimi J. A framework for comparing information engineering methods. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(2):202–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffer J. A., George J. F., Valacich J. S.Modern Systems Analysis and Design (1996) (The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(1):47–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilivari J. Why are CASE tools not used? Comm. ACM (1996) 39(10):94–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kemerer C. F. How the learning curve affects CASE tool adoption. IEEE Software (1992) 9(3):23–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimberly J. R., Evanisko M. J. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad. Management J. (1981) 24:689–713Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identify, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1995) 7(5):502–518Link, Google Scholar
• Kwon T. H., Zmud R. W., Boland R., Hirscheim R. Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (1987) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Law K. S., Wong C., Mobley W. H. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):741–755Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lefkovitz H. C.Proposed American National Standards Information Resource Dictionary System (1985) (QED Information Services, Wellesley, MA) Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res. Policy (1988) 17(5):251–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D., Deschamps I. Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Management Sci. (1988) 34:1252–1265Link, Google Scholar
• Löhmoller J.LVPLS Program Manual: Latent Variables Path Analysis with Partial Least Squares (1984) (University of Kohn, Kohn, Germany) Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Markus L. M. Toward a ‘critical mass’ theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence and diffusion. Comm. Res. (1987) 14:491–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin J.Information Engineering (1989) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Martin J.Information Engineering, Book I: Introduction (1990a) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Martin J.Information Engineering, Book II: Analysis and Design (1990b) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Martin J.Information Engineering, Book III: Design and Construction (1990c) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Martin M. The case against CASE. J. Systems Management (1995) 6(1):54–57Google Scholar
• McClure C.CASE Is Software Automation (1989) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• McClure C.The Three R’s of Software Automation: Re-engineering, Repository, and Reuse (1992) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Mooney C. Z., Duval R. D.Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference (1993) (Sage Press, Newbury Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge Creating Company (1995) (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(3):309–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Gash D. Technological frames: Making sense of information technologies in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1994) 12(2):174–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Yates J., Okamura K., Fujimoto M. Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):423–444Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Reuter H. Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:484–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M.The Tacit Dimension (1962) (Anchor Day, New York) Google Scholar
• Rai A. External information source and channel effectiveness and the diffusion of CASE innovations: An empirical study. Euro. J. Inform. Systems (1995) 4:93–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Howard G. An organizational context for CASE innovation. IRM J. (1993) 6(3):21–34Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1983) 3rd Ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Saga V., Zmud R., Levine L. The nature and determinants of information technology acceptance, routinization and infusion. Diffusion, Transfer, and Implementation of Information Technology (1994) (North-Holland, Amsterdam)67–86Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (1995) (Sage Press, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Slevin D. P., Pinto J. K. Balancing strategy and tactics in project implementation. Sloan Management Rev. (1987) 29(1):33–41Google Scholar
• Spender J. C., Shrivastava P., Huff A., Duttons J. Strategy theorizing: Expanding the agenda. Advances in Strategic Management (1992) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 3–32Google Scholar
• Spender J. C. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:45–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone J. A.Inside ADW and IEF: The Promises and Reality of CASE (1993) (The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York) Google Scholar
• Tabachnik B. G., Fidell L. S.Using Multivariate Statistics (1989) 2nd Ed.(Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum A.Implementing a Corporate Repository: The Models Meet Reality (1994) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Tornatzky L. G., Fleischer M., Tornatzky L. G., Fleischer M. The deployment of technology. The Processes of Technological Innovation (1990) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
• Tornatzky L. G., Klein K. Innovation characteristics and innovation implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1982) 29(1):28–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker L. R., Lewis C. L. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika (1973) 38:1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyre M., Orlikowski W. J. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):98–118Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):590–607Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Delbecq A. L., Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1976) 41:322–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vessey I., Jarvenpaa S. L., Tractinsky N. Evaluation of vendor products: CASE tools as methodology companions. Comm. ACM (1992) 35(4):90–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P., Ungson G. R. Organization memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):57–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walz D. B., Elam J. J., Curtis B. Inside a software design team: A look at knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration activities. Comm. ACM (1993) 63–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Goodman P. S., Sproull L. S.associates Technology as equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies. Technology and Organization (1990) (Jossey-Bassisco, San Francisco, CA) 1–44Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Roberts K. H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:357–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Werts C. E., Linn R. L., Joreskog and K. Interclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Ed. Psych. Measurement (1974) 34:25–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wold H., Fornell C. Systems under indirect observation using PLS. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, Volume I: Methods (1982) (Praeger, New York) 325–347Google Scholar
• Yourdon E.Decline and Fall of the American Programmer (1992) (Yourdon Press, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Zmud R. W. An examination of “push-pull” theory applied to process innovation and knowledge work. Management Sci. (1984) 30(6):727–738Link, Google Scholar