The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model

References

  • Beard D. W., Dess G. G. Corporate-level strategy, business-level strategy, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. (1981) 24(4):663–688CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergeron F., Buteau C., Raymond L. Identification of strategic information systems opportunities: Applying and comparing two methodologies. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(1):89–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broadbent M., Weill P., DeGross J. I., Alavi M., Oppelland H. J. Developing business and information strategy alignment: A study in the banking industry. Proc. Eleventh International Conference on Inform. Systems (1990) (Copenhagen, Denmark) 293–306Google Scholar
  • Brown C. V. Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(1):69–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown C. V., Magill S. L. Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(4):371–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown C. V., Magill S. L. Reconceptualizing the context-design issue for the information systems function. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):176–194LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:1–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Camillus J. C., Lederer A. L. Corporate strategy and the design of computerized information systems. Sloan Management Rev. (1985) 26(3):35–42Google Scholar
  • Chan Y. E., Huff S. L., Barclay D. W., Copeland D. G. Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(2):125–150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Das S. R., Zahra S. A., Warkentin M. E. Integrating the content and process of strategic MIS planning with competitive strategy. Decision Sci. (1991) 22(5):953–984CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delery J., Doty D. H. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictors. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):802–835CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ein-Dor P., Segev E. Organizational computing and MIS structure: Some empirical evidence. MIS Quart. (1982) 6(3):55–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elderidge N., Gould S., Schopf T. J. Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. Models in Paleobiology (1972) (Freeman, Cooper, & Co., San Francisco, CA) 82–115Google Scholar
  • Fiedler K., Grover V., Teng J. T. C. An empirically derived taxonomy of information technology structure and its relationship to organization structure. J. MIS. (1996) 13(1):9–34Google Scholar
  • Galliers R. D., Sutherland A. R. Information systems management and strategy formulation: The “stages of growth” model revisited. J. Inform. Systems (1991) 1:89–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick C. J. G. Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):10–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(4):1022–1054CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gresov C. Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:431–453CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A. Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(1):48–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson J. C., Venkatraman N., Kochan T. A., Useem M. Strategic alignment: A model for organizational transformation through information technology. Transforming Organizations (1992) (Oxford University Press, New York) 97–116Google Scholar
  • Hirschheim R., Earl M., Feeny D., Lockett M., Yuen C. K., Davis G. An exploration into the management of the information systems function: Key issues and an evolutionary model. Proc.: Inform. Tech. Management for Productivity and Strategic Advantage (1988) . IFIP TC-8 Open Conference, 4.15-4.38, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Ives B. Organizing for global competition: The fit of information technology. Decision Sci. (1993) 24(3):547–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jelinek M., Schoonhoven C. B.The Innovation Marathon: Lessons from High Technology Firms (1990) (B. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • King W. R. Strategic planning for management information systems. MIS Quart. (1978) 2(1):27–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lederer A. L., Mendelow A. L. Coordination of information systems plans with business plans. J. MIS (1989) 6(2):5–19Google Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Fit, Failure, and The Hall of Fame: How Companies Succeed or Fail (1996) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C., Meyer A. D., Coleman H. J. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(3):546–562CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. Environmental fit versus internal fit. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):159–178LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. Configurations revisited. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:505–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nadler D., Tushman M. L. A congruence model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Resource Book in Macro Organizational Behavior (1980) (Goodyear, Santa Clara, CA) 30–49Google Scholar
  • Newman M., Robey D. A social process model of user-analyst relationships. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):249–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nolan R. L. Managing the crises in data processing. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1979) 57(2):115–126Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(3):309–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porra J. Colonial systems information colonies, and punctuated prototyping. (1996) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Jyvaskyla, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  • Rackoff N., Wiseman C., Ulrich W. A. Information systems for competitive advantage: Implementation of a planning process. MIS Quart. (1985) 9(4):285–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sabherwal R., King W. R. Towards a theory of strategic use of information resources: An inductive approach. Inform. Management (1991) 20:191–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sabherwal R., Kirs P. The alignment between organizational critical success factors and information technology capability in academic institutions. Decision Sci. (1994) 25(2):301–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W.Managing IT for Success: The Empowering Business Partnership (1992) (Financial Executives Research Foundation, Morristown, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sastry M. A. Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:237–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:349–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B., Jelinek M., Von Glinow M. A., Mohrman S. A. Dynamic tension in innovative, high technology firms: Managing rapid technological change through organization structure. Managing Complexity in High Technology Organizations (1990) (Oxford University Press, New York) 95–99Google Scholar
  • Segev E. A systematic comparative analysis and synthesis of two business-level strategic typologies. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:487–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tavakolian H. Linking the information technology structure with organizational competitive strategy: A survey. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):309–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tesch R.Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools (1990) (The Falmer Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw Hill, Chicago IL) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Newman W. H., Romanelli E. Convergence and upheaval: Managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution. California Management Rev. (1986) 29(1):29–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(4):8–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Drazin R., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. The concept of fit in contingency theory. Research in Organizational Behavior (1985) 7(JAI Press, Greenwood, CT) 333–365Google Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Poole M. S. Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):510–540CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Method (1984) (Sage, Beverly Hills CA) Google Scholar
  • Zmud R. W., Boynton A. C., Jacobs G. C. The new information economy: A new perspective for effective information systems management. Data Base (1986) 18(1):17–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.