Appropriating Value from Computerized Reservation System Ownership in the Airline Industry

References

  • Air Transportation Association of AmericaStrikes Under the Railway Labor Act: U.S. Carriers (1987) Air Conference1946–1986(Washington, DC)Google Scholar
  • Bailey E., Libecap G. Price-service-quality diversity in deregulated airline markets. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth (1988) 2(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 13–46Google Scholar
  • Bakos J. Y. A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1991) 15(4):295–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos J. Y. The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(8):35–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Johnston H. H. An empirical study of the business value of the U.S. airlines' computerized reservation systems. J. Organ. Comput. (1995) 5(3):255–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Kauffman R. J., DeGross J., Olson M.Strategic contributions of information technology: An empirical study of ATM networks (1988) Proc. Ninth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems(Minneapolis, MN)141–150Google Scholar
  • Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barua A., Kriebel C. H., Mukhopadhyay T. Information technologies and business value: An analytical and empirical study. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(1):3–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baumol W. J., Panzar J. C., Willig R. D.Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure (1988) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York) . Revised EdGoogle Scholar
  • Belsley D. A., Kuh E., Welch R. E.Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (1980) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borenstein S. Hubs and high fares: Dominance and market power in the U.S. airline industry. Rand J. Econom. (1989) 20(3):344–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borenstein S. The dominant-firm advantage in multiproduct industries: Evidence from the U.S. airlines. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106(4):1237–1266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breusch T., Pagan A. A simple test for heteroskedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica (1979) 47:1287–1294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Commun. ACM (1993) 35(12):67–77Google Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L.The three faces of information technology value: Theory and evidence (1994) Proc. Fifteenth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems(Vancouver)263–277Google Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. (1996) 42(2):541–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caves D., Christensen L., Tretheway M., Cowing T., Stevenson R. U.S. trunk air carriers, 1972–1977: A multilateral comparison of total factor productivity. Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries (1981) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Chircu A. M., Kauffman R. J. Reintermediation strategies in business-to-business electronic commerce. Internat. J. Electr. Commerce (2000) 4(4):7–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chircu A. M., Kauffman R. J., Keskey D. Maximizing the value of Internet-based corporate travel systems. Comm. ACM (2001) 44(11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E. K. Evaluation of strategic investments in information technology. Comm. ACM (1991) 34(1):22–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E. K., Reddi S. P., Row M. C. The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The move to the middle hypothesis. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(2):9–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E. K., Row M. A case study of economist: A strategic information system. J. Management Inform. Systems (1988) 5(1):36–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E. K., Row M. Information technology at Rosenbluth Travel. J. Management Inform. Systems (1991) 8(2):53–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M., March J., Olsen J. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17:1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper L. G., Nakanishi M.Market Share Analysis: Evaluating Competitive Market Effectiveness (1988) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Copeland D., McKenney J. Airline reservations systems: Lessons from history. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1988) 12(3):353–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornwell C., Schmidt P., Sickles R. Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels. J. Econometrics (1990) 46:185–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davamanirajan P., Mukhopadhyay T., Kriebel C., Kauffman R.Systems design, process performance and economic outcome (1999) (Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Davern M. J., Kauffman R. J. Discovering value and realizing potential from information technology investments. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 16(3):121–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidson R., MacKinnon J. Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica (1981) 49:499–517CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doganis R.Flying Off Course: The Economics of International Airlines (1985) (George Allen and Unwin Publishers, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Dos Santos B., Peffers K. Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications: A study of first movers and early followers in ATMs. Organ. Sci. (1995) 5(2):241–259LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements and predation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):940–955Google Scholar
  • Ghosh A., Craig C. S. Formulating retail location strategy in a changing environment. J. Marketing (1983) 47(Summer):56–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfeld S., Quandt R. Some tests for homoskedasticity. J. Amer. Statis. Assoc. (1965) 60:539–547CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W.Econometric Analysis (1990) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Harris S. E., Katz J. L. Organization performance and information technology investment intensity in the insurance industry. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(3):263–295LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey A., Phillips G. A comparison of the power of some tests for heteroskedasticity in the general linear model. J. Econometrics (1974) 2:307–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain A., Mahajan V. Evaluating the competitive environment in retailing using multiplicative competitive interactive model. Research in Marketing: Volume 2 (1979) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 217–235Google Scholar
  • Johnson R., Vitale M. Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1988) 12(2):153–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judge G. G., Griffiths W. E., Carter Hill R., Lutkepohl H., Lee T. S.The Theory and Practice of Econometrics (1985) 2nd ed.(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kauffman R. J., McAndrews J. J., Wang Y. M. Opening the ‘black box’ of network externalities in network adoption. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):61–82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy P.A Guide to Econometrics (1985) 2nd ed.(The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kmenta J.Elements of Econometrics (1986) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Loveman G. W., Allen T. J., Scott Morton M. S. An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990: Research Studies (1994) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lucas H. C. The use of an accounting information system, action and organizational performance. Accounting Rev. (1975) 50(4):735–746Google Scholar
  • Lucas H. C., Banker R. D., Kauffman R. J., Mahmood M. A. The business value of IT: An historical perspective and thoughts for future research. Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage (1993) (Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA) 359–374Google Scholar
  • Lucas H. C.Information Technology and the Productivity Paradox: Assessing the Value of Investing in IT (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lyle C. Computer-age vulnerability in the international airline industry. J. Air Law and Commerce (1988) 54(1):161–179Google Scholar
  • Malone T., Yates J., Benjamin R. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM. (1987) 30(6):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mata F., Fuerst W., Barney J. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based view. MIS Quart. (1995) 9(4):487–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison S. A., Winston C. Enhancing the performance of the deregulated air transportation system. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1989) (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) 61–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mukhopadhyay T., Mangal V. Direct and indirect impacts of information technology applications on productivity: A field Study. Internat. J. Electron. Commerce (1997) 1(3):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakanishi M., Cooper L. G. Parameter estimation for multiplicative competitive interaction model: Least squares approach. J. Marketing Res. (1974) 11(August):303–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Callaghan R., Kaufmann P. J., Konsynski B. R. Adoption correlates and share effects of electronic data interchange systems in marketing channels. J. Marketing (1992) 56(April):45–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Premkumar G., Ramamurthy K. The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decision Sci. (1995) 26(3):303–336CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reuters/I. P. Sharp Associates LimitedODIA User's Guide: Ticket Dollar Value Origin and Destination Data (1988a) Maya publication of the Data Services Documentation group, 2 First Canadian Place, Suite 1900Toronto, Ontario, CanadaM5X 1E3, Publication Code 0693-8805-E2Google Scholar
  • Reuters/I. P. Sharp Associates LimitedAviation Data Overview (1988b) December6a publication of the Data Services Documentation group, 2 First Canadian Place, Suite 1900Toronto, Ontario, CanadaM5X 1E3, (draft version)Google Scholar
  • Saloner G., Shepard A. Adoption of technologies with network effects: An empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines. Rand J. Econom. (1995) 26(3):279–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sickles R. A nonlinear multivariate error components analysis of technology and specific factor productivity growth with an application to the U.S. airlines. J. Econometrics (1985) 27:61–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sickles R., Good D., Johnson R. Allocative distortions and the regulatory transition of the U.S. airline industry. J. Econometrics (1986) 33:143–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith J. Market performance in domestic airline markets. Transportation J. (1984) 24(1):51–57Google Scholar
  • Stephenson F. J., Fox R. Corporate strategies for frequent flier programs. Transportation J. (1992) 32(1):38–50Google Scholar
  • Strassmann P.The Business Value of Computers (1990) (The Information Economics Press, New Canaan, CT) Google Scholar
  • Teece D., Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration collaboration, licensing, and public policy. The Competitive Challenge (1987) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of TransportationNational Transportation Statistics: 1960–1993 (1993) (The Office of Airline Information, Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Washington, DC) . Information available via The Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Available on the Internet at www.bts.gov/programs/btsprod/nts93htmlGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of TransportationOAI International Air Passenger and Freight Statistics (2000) (The Office of Airline Information, Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Washington, DC) . Annual information available via The Bureau of Transportation Statistics, various issues. Available on the Internet at www.bts.gov/oai/international/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of TransportationStudy of Airline Computer Reservations Systems (1988) May(Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Washington, DC) . DOT-P-37-88-2Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of TransportationSecretary's Task Force on Competition in the U.S. Domestic Airline Industry: Executive Summary (1990) February(Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • U.S. SenateAirline Concentration at Hub Airports: Hearing Before the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the One Hundredth Congress, Second Session (1989a) (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) . S. Hrg. 100-959Google Scholar
  • U.S. SenateAirline Computer Reservation Systems: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Monopolies and Business Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary of the One Hundredth Congress, First Session (1989b) (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) . Serial J-100-46 S. Hrg. 100-971Google Scholar
  • Venkatraman N., Zaheer A. Electronic integration and strategic advantage: A quasi-experimental study in the insurance industry. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(4):377–393LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weill P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(4):307–333LinkGoogle Scholar
  • White H. “A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity”. Econometrica (1980) 48:817–838CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.