Not Just a Formality: Pay System Formalization and Sex-Related Earnings Effects

References

• Aigner D. J., Cain G. G. Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Indust. and Labor Relations Rev. (1977) 30:175–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C. D., Tomaskovic-Devey D. Patriarchal pressures: An exploration of organizational processes that exacerbate and erode gender earnings inequality. Work and Occupations (1995) 22:328–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auster E. R. Task characteristics as a bridge between macro- and micro level research on salary inequality between men and women. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:173–193Google Scholar
• Auster E. R., Drazin R. Sex inequality at higher levels in the hierarchy: An intraorganizational perspective. Sociological Inquiry (1988) 58:216–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron J. N., Cornwall R. R., Wurnava P. V. Organizational evidence of ascription in labor markets. New Approaches to Economic and Social Analyses of Discrimination (1991) (Praeger, New York) 113–143Google Scholar
• Baron J. N., Bielby W. T. Bringing the firms back in: Stratification, segmentation, and the organization of work. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1980) 45:737–765Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron J. N., Newman A. E. For what it's worth: Organizations, occupations, and the value of work done by women and nonwhites. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1990) 55:155–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron L. A. Ask and you shall receive?: Beliefs about salary negotiation. (2001) . Unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Management University of California, Irvine, CAGoogle Scholar
• Bartol K. M., Martin D. C. Influences on managerial pay allocations: A dependency perspective. Personnel Psych. (1988) 41:361–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G.Human Capital (1975) 2nd ed.(National Bureau of Economic Research, New York) Google Scholar
• Bergmann B.The Economic Emergence of Women (1986) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Bird C. E., Reskin B., Roos P. High finance small change: Women's increased representation in bank management. Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads Into Male Occupations (1990) (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
• Blau F. D., Ferber M. A., Winkler A. E.The Economics of Women, Men, and Work (1998) 3rd ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Bridges W. P., Nelson R. L. Markets in hierarchies: Organizational and market influences on gender inequality in a state pay system. Amer. J. Sociology (1989) 95:616–658Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll M., Rubery J., Rubery J. Women's pay in banking in the United Kingdom: Case study of XYZ Bank. Equal Pay in Europe? Closing the Gender Wage Gap (1998) (St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York) 213–230Google Scholar
• Chauvin K. W., Ash R. A. Gender earnings differentials in total pay, base pay, and contingent pay. Indust. and Labor Relations Rev. (1994) 47:634–649Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F., Sutton J., Meyer J., Scott R. Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. Amer. J. Sociology (1993) 99:396–427Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doeringer P. B., Piore M. J.Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis (1971) (Heath, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg R. G., Smith R. S.Modern Labor Economics (2000) 7th ed.(Addison Wesley Longman, New York) Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Agency- and institutional-theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31:488–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• England P., Farkas G., Kilbourne B. S., Dou T. Explaining occupational sex segregation and wages: Findings from a model with fixed effects. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1988) 53:544–558Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein R. A.Forbidden Grounds. The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws (1993) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S., Hambrick D. C. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:484–503Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T., Gilbert D. T., Fiske S. T., Lindzey G. Stereotyping prejudice, and discrimination. Handbook of Social Psychology (1998) (McGraw-Hill, New York) 357–411Google Scholar
• Freedman S. M., Montanari J. R. An integrative model of managerial reward allocation. Acad. Management Rev. (1980) 5:381–390Google Scholar
• Gaertner S. L., Dovidio J. F., Dovidio J. F., Gaertner S. L. The aversive form of racism. Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism (1986) (Academic Press, New York) 61–89Google Scholar
• Gerhart B. Gender differences in current and starting salaries: The role of performance college major, and job title. Indus. and Labor Relations Rev. (1990) 43:418–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerhart B., El Cheikh N. Earnings and percent female: A longitudinal study. Indus. Relations (1991) 30:62–78Google Scholar
• Goldin C. Monitoring costs and occupational segregation by sex: A historical analysis. J. Labor Econom. (1986) 4:1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia L. R., Balkin D. B.Compensation, Organization Strategy, and Firm Performance (1992) (Southwestern, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
• Graves L. M., Powell G. N. Gender bias in interviewers' evaluations of applicants. Handbook of Gender and Work (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 145–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groshen E. The structure of the female/male wage differential: Is it who you are what you do, or where you work? J. Human Resources (1991) 26:457–472Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy M. A.Regression with Dummy Variables (1993) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman M. E. The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1980) 26:386–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewitt AssociatesEconomic conditions and the events of September 11 are prompting some companies to modify their 2002 salary increase projections (2002) . Retrieved January 30 2002, from 〈was.hewitt.com/ebusiness/compensationcenter〉Google Scholar
• Huffman M. L., Velasco S. C. When more is less. Sex composition, organizations, and earnings in U.S. firms. Work and Occupations (1997) 24:214–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huffman M. L., Velasco S. C., Bielby W. T. Where sex composition matters most: Comparing the effects of job versus occupational sex composition on earnings. Sociological Focus (1996) 29:189–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hultin M., Szulkin R. Wages and unequal access to organizational power: An empirical test of gender discrimination. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:453–472Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huselid M. A. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:635–647Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:56–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs J. A., Powell G. N. The sex segregation of occupations: Prospects for the 21st century. Handbook of Gender and Work (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 125–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacoby S.Employing Bureaucracy (1985) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M.Men and Women of the Corporation (1977) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Kessler-Harris A.A Woman's Wage: Historical Meanings and Social Consequences (1990) (The University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY) Google Scholar
• Kilbourne B. S., England P., Farkas G., Beron K., Weir D. Returns to skill, compensating differentials, and gender bias: Effects of occupational characteristics on the wages of white women and men. Amer. J. Sociology (1994) 100:689–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konrad A. M., Linnehan F. Formalized HRM structures: Coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices? Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:787–820Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krieger L. H. The content of our categories: A cognitive bias approach to discrimination and equal employment opportunity. Stanford Law Rev. (1995) 47:1161–1248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence B. S. The black box of organizational demography. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:1–22Link, Google Scholar
• MacPherson D. A., Hirsch B. T. Wages and sex composition: Why do women's jobs pay less? J. Labor Econom. (1995) 13:426–471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Major B. From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. Adv. in Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1994) 26:293–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milkovich G. T., Rowland K. M., Ferris G. R. A strategic perspective on compensation management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (1988) 6(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 263–288Google Scholar
• Milkovich G. T., Newman J. M.Compensation (2002) 7th ed.(McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Murphy K. R., Cleveland J. N.Understanding Performance Appraisal (1995) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Nelson R. L., Bridges W. P.Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women in America (1999) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nieva V. F., Gutek B. A.Women and Work: A Psychological Perspective (1981) (Praeger, New York) Google Scholar
• Oaxaca R. Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1973) 14:693–709Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osterman P.Internal Labor Markets (1984) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Osterman P. Choice of employment systems in internal labor markets. Indust. Relations. (1987) 26:45–67Google Scholar
• Perry E. L., Davis-Blake A., Kulik C. T. Explaining gender-based selection decisions: A synthesis of contextual and cognitive approaches. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19:786–820Google Scholar
• Petersen T. K., Morgan L. A. Separate and unequal: Occupation-establishment sex segregation and the gender wage gap. Amer. J. Sociology (1995) 101:329–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Arthur M. B., Hall D. T., Lawrence B. S. A political perspective on careers: Interests networks, and environments. Handbook of Career Theory (1989) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) 380–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reskin B. F. The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary Sociology (2000) 29:319–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reskin B. F., McBrier D. B. Why not ascription? Organizations' employment of male and female managers. Amer. Sociological Rev. (2000) 65:210–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reskin B. F., Roos P. A.Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads Into Male Occupations (1990) (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
• Roos P. A., Gatta M. L., Powell G. The gender gap in earnings: Trends, explanations, and prospects. Handbook of Gender and Work (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 95–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rozelle R. M., Baxter J. C. Influence of role pressures on the perceiver: Judgments of videotaped interviews varying judge accountability and responsibility. J. Appl. Psych. (1981) 66:437–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubery J. Performance-related pay and the prospects for gender pay equity. J. Management Stud. (1995) 32:637–654Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen E. The crowding hypothesis and comparable worth. J. Human Resources (1990) 25:55–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stroh L. K., Brett J. M., Baumann J. P., P J., Reilly A. H. Agency theory and variable pay compensation strategies. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:751–767Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H.Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (1982) (Cambridge University, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
• Tam T. Sex segregation and occupational gender inequality in the United States: Devaluation or specialized training? Amer. J. Sociology (1997) 102:1652–1692Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui A. S., Gutek B. A.Demographic Differences in Organizations: Current Research and Future Directions (1999) (Lexington Books, Lanham, MD) Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor Employment standards administration press release: Texaco to pay $3.1 million to women professionals and executives in largest pay discrimination settlement. (1999) . Retrieved January 6, 〈http://dol.gov/opa/public/media/press/esa/〉Google Scholar
• Weber M., Gerth H. H., Mills C. W. Bureaucracy. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (1946) (Oxford University Press, New York) 196–244trans.Google Scholar
• Weeden R., Rosen C., Carberry E., Rodrick S.Current Practices in Stock Option Plan Design (2001) 2nd ed.(The National Center for Employee Ownership, Oakland, CA) Google Scholar