Founder-CEO Succession and the Paradox of Entrepreneurial Success

References

  • Allen M. P., Panian S. K., Lotz R. E. Managerial succession and organizational performance: A recalcitrant problem revisited. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:167–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D.Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data (1984) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D., Blossfeld H.-P., Rohwer G. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis (1995) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Antle R., Smith A. Measuring executive compensation: Methods and an application. J. Accounting Res. (1985) 23:296–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnard C.The Functions of the Executive (1938) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Barrett L. A year to remember and forget. Red Herring (2000) December 29Google Scholar
  • Becker G. S.Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis (1964) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Berle A., Means G. C.The Modern Corporation and Public Property (1932) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Blossfeld H.-P., Rohwer G.Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis (1995) (Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Boecker W. Power and managerial dismissal: Scapegoating at the top. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:400–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton M. D., Khurana R. The routinization of charisma: Employment systems, succession, and firm survival. (2000) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Bygrave W. Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective. J. Bus. Venturing (1987) 2CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannella A., Lubatkin M. Succession as a sociopolitical process. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:763–793CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carland J. W., Hoy F., Boulton W., Carland J. A. C. Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:354–359CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R. Dynamics of publisher succession in newspaper organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:93–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Mosakowski E. The career dynamics of self employment. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1987) 32:570–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J. Organizational structure environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology (1972) 6:1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi Y. R., Shanley M. T. A new venture's honeymoon period: Knowledge, resources, and real options reasoning. Proc. Acad. Management (2000) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ciampa D., Watkins M. D.Right From the Start: Taking Charge in a New Leadership Role (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cox D. R. Regression models and life tables. J. Royal Statist. Soc. (1972) 34:187–202Series BGoogle Scholar
  • Dalton D. R., Kesner I. F. Inside/outside succession and organizational size: The pragmatics of executive succession. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:736–742CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dalton D. R., Kesner I. F. Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Acad. Management J. (1984) 28:749–762CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D'Aveni R. A.Hypercompetition (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Denis D. J., Denis D. K. Performance changes following top management dismissals. J. Finance (1995) 50:1029–1057CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobrev S. D., Barnett W. P. Organizational roles and transitions to entrepreneurship. (1999) Google Scholar
  • Drucker P. F.The Practice of Management (1954) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dyer W. G. J.Cultural Change in Family Firms: Anticipating and Managing Business and Family Transitions (1986) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(3):543–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiet J. O., Busenitz L. W., Moesel D. D., Barney J. B. Complementary theoretical perspectives on the dismissal of new venture team members. J. Bus. Venturing (1997) 12:347–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S. Power in top management teams: Dimensions measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:505–538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S., Hambrick D. C. Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:121–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson J. W., Hambrick D. C., Baumrin S. A model of CEO dismissal. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(2):255–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman S. D., Singh H. CEO succession and stockholder reaction: The influence of organizational context and event content. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:718–744CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furtado E. P., Karan V. Causes, consequences, and shareholder wealth effects of management turnover: A review of the empirical evidence. Financial Management (1990) 19(2):60–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gamson W. A., Scotch N. Scapegoating in baseball. Amer. J. Sociology (1964) 70:69–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1999) (Aldine de Gruyter, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gompers P. Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. J. Finance (1995) 50:1461–1489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers P., Lerner J.The Venture Capital Cycle (1999) (MIT Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gompers P., Lerner J.The Money of Invention (2001) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Goodstein J., Gautam K., Boeker W. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:241–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon G. W., Rosen N. A. Critical factors in leadership succession. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1981) 27:227–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould W. Stata FAQ: How do I estimate a Cox model with a continuously time-varying parameter? (1999) . www.stata.comGoogle Scholar
  • Gouldner A. W.Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy (1954) (The Free Press, Glencoe, IL) Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Small is bountiful: Labor markets and establishment size. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1984) 49:323–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greiner L. E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1972) 50(4):37–46Google Scholar
  • Grusky O. Corporate size bureaucratization, and managerial succession. Amer. J. Sociology (1961) 67:263–269CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grusky O. Managerial succession and organizational effectiveness. Amer. J. Sociology (1963) 69:21–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grusky O. Succession with an ally. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1969) 14:155–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper echelon: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:193–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handler W. C. Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (1990) Fall):37–51Google Scholar
  • Handler W. C., Kram K. E. Succession in family firms: The problem of resistance. Family Bus. Rev. (1988) 1(4):361–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J.Organizational Ecology (1989) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A. Ghosts of managers past: Managerial succession and organizational mortality. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(4):864–881CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helmich D. Executive succession in the corporate organization: A current integration. Acad. Management Rev. (1977) 2):286–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R., Lee C. A., Schneck R. E., Pennings J. M. A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 16:216–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofer C. W., Charan R. The transition to professional management: Mission impossible? Amer. J. Small Bus. (1984) 9(1):1–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • House R. J., Singh J., Tucker P. J. Some causes and effects of executive succession: An ecological perspective. Academy of Management Meeting (1985) San Diego, CAPresented at theGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. The takeover controversy: Analysis and evidence. Corporate Finance J. (1986) 4(2):6–32Google Scholar
  • Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:305–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter R. M.Men and Women of the Corporation (1977) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kesner I. F., Sebora T. C. Executive succession: Past, present, and future. J. Management (1994) 20(2):327–372Google Scholar
  • Khurana R., Nohria N. The effects of CEO turnover in large industrial corporations: A study of the Fortune 200 from 1978-1993. (1999) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Kotin J., Sharaf M. Management succession and administrative style. Psychiatry (1967) 30:237–248Google Scholar
  • Lansberg I. The succession conspiracy. Family Bus. Rev. (1988) 1(2):245–255Google Scholar
  • Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Levinson H. Conflicts that plague family businesses. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1971) 49(2):90–98Google Scholar
  • Lin D. Y., Wei L. J. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J. Amer. Statist. Association (1989) 84:1074–1078CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lorsch J.Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Boards (1989) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Mace M.Directors: Myth and Reality (1971) (Division of Research, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Main B. G. M., O'Reilly C. A., Wade J. The CEO, board of directors and executive compensation: Economic and psychological perspectives. Indust. and Corporate Change (1995) 4(2):293–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marino K., Dollinger M. Top management succession in entrepreneurial firms: Cases from the computer industry. J. Management Case Stud. (1987) 3:70–79Google Scholar
  • McEachern W. A.Managerial Control and Performance (1975) (Heath, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
  • McGivern C. The dynamics of management succession. Management Decision–U.K. (1978) 16:32–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociology (1977) 83:340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H.Power In and Around Organizations (1983) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Mizruchi M. S. Who controls whom? An examination of the relation between management and boards of directors in large corporations. Acad. Management Rev. (1983) 8:426–435Google Scholar
  • Nohria N.Creating new business ventures: Network organization in market and corporate contexts (1988) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertationGoogle Scholar
  • O'Reilly C. A., Chatman J. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. J. Appl. Psych. (1986) 71:492–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Leblebici H. Executive recruitment and the development of interfirm organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1973) 18:449–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependency Perspective (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Puffer S., Weintrop J. Corporate performance and CEO turnover: The role of performance expectations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reinganum M. R. The effect of executive succession on stockholder wealth. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30(1):46–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson R. J., Osnabrugge M. V.Angel Investing: Matching Startup Funds with Startup Companies (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Rubenson G. C., Gupta A. K. Replacing the founder: Exploding the myth of the entrepreneur's disease. Bus. Horizons (1992) 35(6):53–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubenson G. C., Gupta A. K. The initial succession: A contingency model of founder tenure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (1996) 21(2):21–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sahlman W. A., Stevenson H. H., Roberts M. J., Bhide A.The Entrepreneurial Venture (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. Who gets power—and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power. Organ. Dynam. (1977) 5:373–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in corporations. Acad. Management J. (1980) 23:653–664CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schein E.Organizational Culture and Leadership (1985) (Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Schoenfeld D. Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika (1982) 69:239–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonnenfeld J. Heroes in collision: Chief executive retirement and the parade of future leaders. Human Resource Management (1986) 25:305–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tashakori M.Management Succession: From the Owner-Founder to the Professional President (1980) (Praeger, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tuma N. B., Hannan M. T., Groeneveld L. D. Dynamic analysis of event histories. Amer. J. Sociology (1979) 84:820–854CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Useem M.Executive Defense: Shareholder Power and Corporate Reorganization (1993) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Waldman D. A., Ramirez G. G., Gabriel G., House R. J., Puranam P. Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):134–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • wasserman N. Venture capital negotiations: VC versus entrepreneur. (1999) (Harvard Business School Note #800-170. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wasserman N. Inside the black box of entrepreneurial incentives. (2001) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman N. The venture capitalist as entrepreneur: Characteristics and dynamics within VC firms. (2002) (Harvard University, Boston, MA) . Unpublished Ph.D. thesisGoogle Scholar
  • Nohria Wasserman N. N., Anand B. When does leadership matter? The contingent opportunities view of CEO leadership. (2001) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M.From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (1946) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weick K.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1969) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wiersema M. F. Strategic consequences of executive succession within diversified firms. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29:73–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woodward J.Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zajac E. J. CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:217–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaleznik A. M. F., Kets de Vries R.Power and the Corporate Mind (1975) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.