Open Source Software and the “Private-Collective” Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science

References

  • Aldrich H.Organizations Evolving (1999) (Sage, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Allen Robert C. Collective invention. J. Econom. Behavior and Organ. (1983) 4(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K., Nelson R. R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arthur W. B., Arthur W. B. Path-dependence self-reinforcement, and human learning. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (1997) (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) 133–158Google Scholar
  • Audretsch D. B., Feldman M. P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(3):630–640Google Scholar
  • Audretsch D. B., Stephan P. E. Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: Sources and incentives. J. Evolutionary Econom. (1999) 9:97–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Austin R. D. The effects of time pressure on quality in software development: An agency model. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(2):195–207LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R.The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Benford R. D. You could be the hundreth monkey: Collective action frames and vocabularies of motives within the nuclear disarmament movement. Sociological Quart. (1993) 34:195–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calhoun C. The radicalism of tradition: Community strength or venerable disguise and borrowed language? Amer. J. Sociology (1988) 88(5):886–924CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). (2000) . Working Paper 7522, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J.The Mathematics of Collective Action (1973) (Aldine, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Coloner J. M. Leadership games in collective action. Rationality and Society (1995) 7(2):225–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conner K. R., Prahalad C. K. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):477–501LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cusumano M. C. Shifting economies: From craft production to flexible systems and software factories. Res. Policy (1992) 21(5):453–480CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dam K. W. Some economic considerations in the intellectual property protection of software. J. Legal Stud. (1995) 24(2):321–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz H. Towards a theory of property rights. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1967) 57:347–359Google Scholar
  • Elster J.An Introduction to Karl Marx (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eyerman R., Jamison A.Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach (1991) (Penn State Press, University Park, PA) Google Scholar
  • Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. (1999) 114(3):817–868CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fireman B., Gamson W. H., Zald M. N., McCarthy J. D. Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective. The Dynamics of Social Movements (1979) (Winthrop, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Franke Nik, Sonali Shah. How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among innovative users of sports equipment. (2001) . Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman D., McAdam D., Morris A. D., McClurg C. Collective identity and activism: Networks, choices, and the life of a social movement. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (1992) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) 156–173Google Scholar
  • Frolich N., Oppenheimer J. A., Young O.Political Leadership and Collective Goods (1971) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Glaser B., Strauss A.The Discovery of Grounded Theory (1967) (Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Halbert D. Discourses of danger and the computer hacker. Inform. Soc. (1997) 13(4):361–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardin R. R. Collective action as an aggregate N-prisoner's dilemma. Behavioral Sci. (1971) 16:472–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardin R. R.Collective Action (1982) (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
  • Harhoff D., Henkel J., von Hippel E. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit from freely revealing their innovations. (2000) . Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Hermann S., Hertel G., Niedner S.Linux Study Homepage (2000) . www.psychologie.uni-kiel.de/linux-study/writeup.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Hess S. Individual behavior and collective action towards the environment: An economic framework based on the social customs approach. Rationality and Soc. (1998) 10(2):203–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Himanen P., Linus Torvalds, Manuel Castells. The Hacker Ethic (2001) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jargon File, version 4.3.1 (2001) . www.tuxedo.org/∼esr/jargon/html/entry/hacker.htmlJune 29, [The Jargon File is a collective online work by computer hackers. In print form, it is Raymond, Eric. 1999b.]Google Scholar
  • Koch S., Schneider G. Results from software engineering research into open source development projects using public data. (2000) . Work paper, University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Metiu A. Open source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy (2001) 17(2):248–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohanski D.Moths in the Machine (1998) (St. Martin's Griffin, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lakhani K., von Hippel E. How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. (2000) . Working Paper 4117, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani K., Wolf R. Does free software mean free labor? Characteristics of participants in open source communities. (2001) . Boston Consulting Group Survey Report, Boston, MA. (Available at www.osdn.com/bcg/.)Google Scholar
  • Lee G. K., Cole R. The Linux kernel development as a model of open source knowledge creation. (2000) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J., Tirole J. The simple economics of open source. (2000) . NBER Working paper series, WP 7600, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Levin R. C., Klevorick A. K., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Econom. Activity (1987) 3:783–831CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy Steven. Hackers (1984) (Anchor/Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Liebeskind J. P. Knowledge strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:93–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marwell G., Oliver P.The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCaffrey D. P., Faerman S. R., Hart D. W. The appeal and difficulties of participative systems. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(6):603–627LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McCarthy J. D., Zald M. N. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. Amer. J. Sociology (1977) 82:1212–1241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPhail C., Miller D. The assembling process: A theoretical and empirical examination. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1973) 38:721–735CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Melucci A.Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age (1999) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Metiu A., Kogut B. Distributed knowledge and the global organization of software development. (2002) . opensource.mit.eduGoogle Scholar
  • Merton R. K., Storer N. W. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. (1973) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Meyer M. H., Lopez L. Technology strategy in a software products company. J. Product Innovation Management (1995) 12(4):194–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moerke K. A. Free speech to a machine. Minnesota Law Rev. (2000) 84(4):1007–1008Google Scholar
  • Monge P. R., Fulk J., Kalman M. E., Flanagin A. J., Parnassa C., Rumsey S. Production of collective action in alliancebased interorganizational communication and information systems. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):411–433LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moon J. Y., Sproull L. Essence of distributed work: The case of the Linux kernel. First Monday (2000) 5(11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison P. D., Roberts J. H., von Hippel E. Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Sci. (2000) 46(12):1513–1527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver P. E. Rewards and punishment as selective incentives for collective action: Theoretical investigations. Amer. J. Sociology (1980) 85:1356–1375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver P. E., Marwell G. The paradox of group size in collective action: A Theory of the Critical Mass II. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1988) 53(1):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson M.The Logic of Collective Action (1967) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • O'Mahony S. Guarding the commons: How open source contributors protect their work. (2002) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Osterloh M., Frey B. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):538–550LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrom E. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1998) 92(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlicek R. C.Embracing Insanity: Open Source Software Development (2000) (Sams, Indianapolis, IN) Google Scholar
  • Perens Bruce. The open source definition. (1998) . http://perens.com/Articles/OSD.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game-theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993) 83(5):1281–1302Google Scholar
  • Raub W. Problematic social situations and the large number dilemma: A game theoretical analysis. J. Math. Sociology (1988) 13:311–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raymond E.The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary (1999a) (O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raymond E.The Hacker's New Dictionary (1999b) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Roy W. G., Parker-Gwin Nicolai R. How many logics of collective action? Theory and Soc. (1999) 28:203–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salisbury R. H. An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest J. Political Sci. (1969) 13:1–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sawyer S., Guinan P. J. Software development: Process and performance. IBM Systems J. (1998) 37(4):552–569CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmitt P., Swope K., Walker J. Collective action with incomplete commitment: Experimental evidence. Southern Econom. J. (2000) 66:829–855CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwart E. P., Tomz M. R. The long-run advantages of centralization for collective action. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1997) 92(3):685–693CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz M., Paul S., Morris A. D., McClurg C. Resource mobilization versus the mobilization of people. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (1992) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) 205–223Google Scholar
  • Simon E. Innovation and intellectual property protection: The software industry perspective. Columbia J. World Bus. (1996) 31(1):30–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snow D. A., Benford R. D., Morris A. D., McClurg C. Master-frames and cycles of protest. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (1992) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) 133–154Google Scholar
  • Snow D. A., Zurcher L., Ekland-Olson S. Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1980) 45:787–801CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephan P. The economics of science. J. Econom. Literature (1996) XXXIV:1199–1235Google Scholar
  • Stroup R. L. Free-riders and collective action revisited. Independent Rev. (2000) 4(4):485–501Google Scholar
  • Swanson G. E. Doing this together—Some basic forms of agency and structure in collective action and some explanations. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1992) 55(2):94–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H.Social Identity and Integroup Relations (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Tajfel H., Turner J. C., Austin W. G., Worchel S. An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1979) (Brooks/Coole, Monterey, CA) Google Scholar
  • Taylor C. T., Silberston Z. A.The Economic Impact of the Patent System: A Study of the British Experience (1973) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Taylor M., Taylor M. Rationality and revolutionary collective action. Rationality and Revolution (1989) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) 63–97Google Scholar
  • Taylor M., Singleton S. The communal resource: Transaction costs and the solution of collective action problems. Politics and Society (1993) 195–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • von Hippel E. Economics of product development by users: The impact of sticky local information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):629–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E. Innovation by user communities: Learning from open source software. Sloan Management Rev. (2001) JulyGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G. Care in knowledge creation. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):133–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G. The communal resource and information systems. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2002) 11(2):85–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Lakhari K. Community, joining and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy. (2003) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wayner P.Free for All (2000) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wenger E.Communities of Practice (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wenger E. Strategic communities and knowledge diffusion. Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 41(3Google Scholar
  • Yamauchi Y., Yokozawa M., Shinohara T., Ishida T.Collaboration with Lean Media: How Open-Source Software Succeeds (2000) (ACM. CSCW '00, Philadelphia, PA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young G., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. Austrian and industrial organization perspectives on firm level competitive activity and performance. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):243–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zald M., Morris A. D., McClurg C. Looking backward to look forward: Reflections on the past and future of the resource mobilization research program. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (1992) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) 326–350Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.