Performance Feedback and Firm Risk Taking: The Moderating Effects of CEO and Outside Director Stock Options

References

• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Altman EI (1983) Exploring the road to bankruptcy. J. Bus. Strategy 4(2):36–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthurs JD, Hoskisson RE, Busenitz LW, Johnson RA (2008) Managerial agents watching other agents: Multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. Acad. Management J. 51(2):277–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Greve HR (2006) Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. 52(1):83–94.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker M, Wurgler J (2002) Market timing and capital structure. J. Finance 57(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkin DB, Markman GD, Gomez-Mejia LR (2000) Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? Acad. Management J. 43(6):1118–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker VL III, Mueller GC (2002) CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Sci. 48(6):782–801.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.Link, Google Scholar
• Baysinger B, Hoskisson RE (1989) Diversification strategy and R&D intensity in multiproduct firms. Acad. Management J. 32(2):310–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baysinger BD, Kosnik RD, Turk TA (1991) Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate research and development strategy. Acad. Management J. 34(1):205–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beatty RP, Zajac E (1994) Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):313–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. 81(3):637–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois LJ III (1981) On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. 6(1):29–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois LJ III, Singh JV (1983) Organizational slack and political behavior within top management teams. Acad. Management Proc. 1983(August):43–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd BK (1994) Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management J. 15(5):335–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyle E, Shapira Z (2012) The liability of leading: Battling aspiration and survival goals in the Jeopardy! Tournament of Champions. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1100–1113.Link, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P (1991) Testing a casual model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 34(1):37–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Daily CM, Cannella AA, Dalton DR (2003) Giving money to get money: How CEO stock options and CEO equity enhance IPO valuations. Acad. Management J. 46(5):643–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen W-R (2008) Determinants of firms’ backward- and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organ. Sci. 19(4):609–622.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen W-R, Miller KD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management J. 28(4):369–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng JLC, Kesner IF (1997) Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: The impact of resource allocation patterns. J. Management 23(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung KH, Pruitt SW (1994) A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management 23(3):70–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffee JC (1988) Shareholders versus managers: The strain in the corporate web. Coffee JC, Lowenstein L, Rose-Ackerman S, eds. Knights, Raiders and Targets: The Impact of the Hostile Takeover (Oxford University Press, New York), 77–134.Google Scholar
• Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveen L (2006) Managerial incentives and risk-taking. J. Financial Econom. 79(2):431–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, Kang SH, Kumar P (2002) Corporate governance, takeovers, and top-management compensation: Theory and evidence. Management Sci. 48(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Daily CM, Dalton DR, Cannella AA (2003) Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):371–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daily CM, Johnson JL, Ellstrand AE, Dalton DR (1998) Compensation committee composition as a determinant of CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 41(2):209–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton DR, Daily CM, Ellstrand AE, Johnson JL (1998) Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 19(3):269–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta S, Iskandar-Datta M, Raman K (2001) Executive compensation and corporate acquisition decisions. J. Finance 56(6):2299–2336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David P, Hitt MA, Gimeno J (2001) The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. Acad. Management J. 44(1):144–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch Y (2007) The influence of outside directors’ stock-option compensation on firm’s R&D. Corporate Governance 15(5):816–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch Y, Keil T, Laamanen T (2007) Decision making in acquisitions: The effect of outside directors’ compensation on acquisition patterns. J. Management 33(1):30–56.Google Scholar
• Deutsch Y, Keil T, Laamanen T (2011) A dual agency view of board compensation: The joint effects of outside director and CEO stock options on firm risk. Strategic Management J. 32(2):212–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devers CE, Wiseman RM, Holmes RM (2007a) The effects of endowment and loss aversion in managerial stock option valuation. Acad. Management J. 50(1):191–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devers CE, Cannella AA Jr, Reilly GP, Yoder ME (2007b) Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments. J. Management 33(6):1016–1072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devers CE, McNamara G, Wiseman RM, Arrfelt M (2008) Moving closer to the action: Examining compensation design effects on firm risk. Organ. Sci. 19(4):548–566.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Political Econom. 88(2):288–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983a) Agency problems and residual claims. J. Law Econom. 26(2):327–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983b) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris SP, Jagannathan M, Pritchard AC (2003) Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. J. Finance 58(3):1087–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich EM, Shivdasani A (2005) The impact of stock option compensation for outside directors on firm value. J. Bus. 78(6):2229–2254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich EM, Shivdasani A (2006) Are busy boards effective monitors? J. Finance 61(2):689–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1996) Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (West’s Strategic Management Series) (West Publishing, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Mooney AC (2003) Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Acad. Management Executive 17(2):101–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedrich RJ (1982) In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. Amer. J. Political Sci. 26(4):797–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden BR, Zajac EJ (2001) When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × power = strategic change. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1087–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia LR, Wiseman RM (1997) Reframing executive compensation: An assessment and outlook. J. Management 23(3):291–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gooding RZ, Goel S, Wiseman RM (1996) Fixed versus variable reference points in the risk-return relationship. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 29(2):331–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003a) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003b) Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding. Indust. Corporate Change 12(5):1051–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Westphal JD (1999) Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):473–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Dalziel T (2003) Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource-based dependence perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):383–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD, Harrison JS (1991) Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Acad. Management J. 34(3):693–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Johnson RA, Moesel DD (1996) The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Acad. Management J. 39(5):1084–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes MR, Bromiley P, Devers CE, Holcomb TR, McGuire JB (2011) Management theory applications of prospect theory: Accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities. J. Management 37(4):1069–1107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Johnson MA, Hill CWL (1993) Managerial incentives and investment in R&D in large multiproduct firms. Organ. Sci. 4(2):325–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer DN, Miller KD (2008) Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 51(4):808–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr JL, Kren L (1992) Effect of relative decision monitoring on chief executive compensation. Acad. Management J. 35(2):370–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesner IF, Johnson RB (1990) An investigation of the relationship between board composition and stockholder suits. Strategic Management J. 11(4):327–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kole SR (1997) The complexity of compensation contracts. J. Financial Econom. 43(1):79–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kor YY (2006) Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management J. 27(11):1081–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lant TK (1992) Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. 38(5):623–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Larraza-Kintana M, Wiseman RM, Gomez-Mejia LR, Welbourne TM (2007) Disentangling compensation and employment risks using the behavioral agency model. Strategic Management J. 28(10):1001–1019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee PM, O’Neill HM (2003) Ownership structures and R&D investments of U.S. and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. Acad. Management J. 46(2):212–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D, Eden L, Hitt MA, Ireland RD (2008) Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. Acad. Management J. 51(2):315–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim ENK, McCann BT (2013) The influence of relative values of outside director stock options on firm strategic risk from a multi-agent perspective. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1568–1590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linn SC, Park D (2005) Outside director compensation policy and the investment opportunity set. J. Corporate Finance 11(4):680–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33(11):1404–1418.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99(1):172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matta E, McGuire J (2008) Too risky to hold? The effect of downside risk, accumulated equity wealth, and firm performance on CEO equity reduction. Organ. Sci. 19(4):567–580.Link, Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Chen WR (2004) Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March–Shapira model. Acad. Management J. 47(1):105–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ, Lant TK (1991) The effect of an organization’s recent performance history on strategic persistence and change: The role of managerial interpretations. Shrivastava P, Huff A, Dutton J, eds. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 7 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 129–156.Google Scholar
• Monks RA, Minow N (1995) Corporate Governance (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Murphy KJ (1985) Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1–3):11–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy KJ (1999) Executive compensation. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics (North Holland, Amsterdam), 2485–2563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1985) Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance and Experimental Designs (Irwin, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
• Ocasio WC (1995) The enactment of economic adversity: A reconciliation of theories of failure-induced change and threat-rigidity. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 17 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 287–331.Google Scholar
• O’Connor JP, Priem RL, Coombs JE, Gilley KM (2006) Do CEO stock options prevent or promote fraudulent financial reporting? Acad. Management J. 49(3):483–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer TB, Wiseman RM (1999) Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Strategic Management J. 20(11):1037–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parrino R, Poteshman AM, Weisbach MS (2005) Measuring investment distortions when risk-averse managers decide whether to undertake risky projects. Financial Management 34(1):21–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource-Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Rajgopal S, Shevlin T (2002) Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. J. Accounting Econom. 33(2):145–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan HE, Wiggins RA (2001) The influence of firm-and manager-specific characteristics on the structure of executive compensation. J. Corporate Finance 7(2):101–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan HE, Wiggins RA (2002) The interactions between R&D investment decisions and compensation policy. Financial Management 31(1):5–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan HE, Wiggins RA (2004) Who is in whose pocket? Director compensation, board independence, and barriers to effective monitoring. J. Financial Econom. 73(3):497–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders WG (2001) Behavioral responses of CEOs to stock ownership and stock option pay. Acad. Management J. 44(3):477–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders WG, Hambrick DC (2007) Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1055–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• SAS Institute (2010) SAS/ETS® 9.22 User’s Guide (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).Google Scholar
• Schneider SL (1992) Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 18(5):1040–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharpe WF (1970) Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh JV (1986) Performance, slack and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. 29(3):562–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sitkin SB, Weingart LR (1995) Determinants of risky decision making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and risk propensity. Acad. Management J. 38(6):1573–1592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4):501–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuggle CS, Sirmon DG, Reutzel CR, Bierman L (2010) Commanding board of director attention: Investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring. Strategic Management J. 31(9):946–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vissa B, Greve HR, Chen W-R (2010) Business group affiliation and firm search behavior in India: Responsiveness and focus of attention. Organ. Sci. 21(3):696–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Seward JK (1990) On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. 15(3):421–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD (1998) Board games: How CEOs adapt to increases in structural board independence from management. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(3):511–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Fredrickson JW (2001) Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1113–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1984) Corporate governance. Yale Law J. 93(7):1197–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiseman RM, Bromiley P (1996) Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance and decline. Organ. Sci. 7(5):524–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiseman RM, Gomez-Mejia L (1998) A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Acad. Management Rev. 23(1):133–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2006) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (Thomson South-Western, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Wright P, Kroll M, Krug JA, Pettus M (2007) Influences of top management team incentives on firm risk taking. Strategic Management J. 28(1):81–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yermack D (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. J. Financial Econom. 40(2):185–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yermack D (2004) Remuneration, retention, and reputation incentives for outside directors. J. Finance 59(5):2281–2308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1994) The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations: When is more not better. Strategic Management J. 15(Winter special issue):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1996) Director reputation, CEO-board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):507–529.Crossref, Google Scholar