Weaving Straw into Gold: Managing Organizational Tensions Between Standardization and Flexibility in Microfinance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0831

References

  • Adler PS (2001) Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organ. Sci. 12(2):215–234.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adler PS (2012) The sociological ambivalence of bureaucracy: From Weber via Gouldner to Marx. Organ. Sci. 23(1):244–266.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):61–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alderman H (1996) Saving and economic shocks in rural Pakistan. J. Development Econom. 51(2):343–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armendáriz de Aghion B (1999) On the design of a credit agreement with peer monitoring. J. Development Econom. 60(1):79–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (2002) Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):39–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron JN, Burton MD, Hannan MT (1996) The road taken: Origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2):239–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron JN, Hannan MT, Burton MD (1999) Building the iron cage: Determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 64(4):527–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron JN, Hannan MT, Burton MD (2001) Labor pains: Change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high-tech firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(4):960–1012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearman PS (1991) Desertion as localism: Army unit solidarity and group norms in the U.S. Civil War. Soc. Forces 70(2):321–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger AN, Klapper LF, Udell GF (2001) The ability of banks to lend to informationally opaque small businesses. J. Banking Finance 25(12):2127–2167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhide A (2010) A Call for Judgment: Sensible Finance for a Dynamic Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Blau PM (1963) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Bradach JL (1997) Using the plural form in the management of restaurant chains. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):276–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Canales R (2011) Rule bending, sociological citizenship, and organizational contestation in microfinance. Regulation Governance 5(1):90–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Canales R, Greenberg J (2013) A matter of (relational) style: Loan officer coherence and consistency in contract enforcement in microfinance. Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  • Canales R, Nanda R (2012) A darker side to decentralized banks: Market power and credit rationing in SME lending. J. Financial Econom. 105(2):353–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christen RP, Rhyne E, Vogel R, McKean C (1995) Maximizing the outreach of microenterprise finance: An analysis of successful microfinance programs. USAID Program and Operations Assessment Report, USAID, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G, Egidi M, Marengo L, Warglien M, Winter S (1996) Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corp. Change 5(3):653–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement):S95–S120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coslovsky SV (2011) Relational regulation in the Brazilian ministério publico: The organizational basis of regulatory responsiveness. Regulation Governance 5(1):70–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cull R, Demirguc-Kunt A, Morduch J (2009) Microfinance meets the market. J. Econom. Perspect. 23(1):167–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daley-Harris S (2009) State of the Microcredit Summit Campaign Report 2009. Microcredit Summit Campaign, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Dawes RM (1979) Robust beauty of improper linear-models in decision-making. Amer. Psych. 34(7):571–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE (1989) Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 243(4899):1668–1674.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dugan M, Goodwin-Groen R (2005) Donors succeed by making themselves obsolete: Compartamos taps financial markets in Mexico. CGAP Direct Case Study 19, CGAP, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Edelman LB (1992) Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(6):1531–1576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman LB, Uggen C, Erlanger HS (1999) The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance procedures as rational myth. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(2):406–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1419–1452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emirbayer M, Mische A (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):962–1023.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erikson E, Bearman P (2006) Malfeasance and the foundations for global trade: The structure of English trade in the East Indies, 1601–1833. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(1):195–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ewick P, Silbey SS (1999) Common knowledge and ideological critique: The significance of knowing that the “haves” come out ahead. Law Soc. Rev. 33(4):1025–1041.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS (2004) Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organ. Sci. 15(3):295–309.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernandez-Mateo I (2009) Cumulative gender disadvantage in contract employment. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(4):871–923.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Field E, Pande R (2008) Repayment frequency and default in microfinance: Evidence from India. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(2–3):501–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gine X, Jakiela P, Karlan D, Morduch J (2010) Microfinance games. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 2(3):60–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1980) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine Publishing, Hawthorne, NY).Google Scholar
  • Gould RV (1995) Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Heimer CA (1992) Doing your job AND helping your friends: Universalistic norms about obligations to particular others in networks. Eccles RG, Nohria N, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 143–164.Google Scholar
  • Heimer CA (1999) Competing institutions: Law, medicine, and family in neonatal intensive care. Law Soc. Rev. 33(1):17–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Roberts PW (2000) Friendships among competitors in the Sidney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):387–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain S, Mansuri G (2003) A little at a time: The use of regularly scheduled repayments in microfinance programs. J. Development Econom. 72(1):253–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karlan D, Valdivia M (2011) Teaching entrepreneurship: Impact of business training on microfinance clients and institutions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(2):510–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipsky M (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (Rusell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Maniha JK (1975) Universalism and particularism in bureaucratizing organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 20(2):177–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1997) Understanding how decisions happen in organizations. Shapira Z, eds. Organizational Decision Making (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 9–32.Google Scholar
  • May PJ, Winter S (2000) Reconsidering styles of regulatory enforcement: Patterns in Danish agro-environmental inspection. Law Policy 22(2):143–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morduch J (1994) Poverty and vulnerability. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(2):221–225.Google Scholar
  • Morduch J (1999) The microfinance promise. J. Econom. Literature 37(4):1569–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morduch J (2000) The microfinance schism. World Development 28(4):617–629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morduch J, Armendáriz de Aghion B (2005) The Economics of Microfinance (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Parsons T, Shils EA (1951) Toward a General Theory of Action (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen MA, Rajan RG (1994) The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. J. Finance 49(1):3–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen T, Saporta I (2004) The opportunity structure for discrimination. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(4):852–901.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Leong A, Strehl K (1977) Paradigm development and particularism: Journal publication in three scientific disciplines. Soc. Forces 55(4):938–951.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piore MJ (2011) Beyond markets: Sociology, street-level bureaucracy, and the management of the public sector. Regulation Governance 5(1):145–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piore MJ, Sabel CF (1984) The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pires R (2008) Promoting sustainable compliance: Styles of labour inspection and compliance outcomes in Brazil. Internat. Labour Rev. 147(2–3):199–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell WW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy—Network forms of organization. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 295–336. Google Scholar
  • Sabel CF (2006) A real time revolution in routines. Heckscher CC, Adler PS, eds. The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 106–156.Google Scholar
  • Schelling TC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Silbey SS (2011) The sociological citizen: Pragmatic and relational regulation in law and organizations. Regulation Governance 5(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silbey SS, Huising R, Coslovsky S (2009) The sociological citizen: Recognizing relational interdependence in law and organizations. L’ Annee Sociologique 59(1):201–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spicker P (1994) Understanding particularism. Critical Soc. Policy 13(39):5–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stiglitz JE (1990) Peer monitoring and credit markets. World Bank Econom. Rev. 4(3):351–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson S, Hoggett P (1996) Universalism, selectivism, and particularism: Towards a postmodern social policy. Critical Soc. Policy 16(46):21–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):674–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B (1999) Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 64(4):481–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (1990) Monitoring agents with other agents. J. Inst. Theoret. Econom. 146(1):153–174.Google Scholar
  • Weber M (1978) Bureaucracy. Roth G, Wittich C, eds. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (University of California Press, Los Angeles), 956–1005.Google Scholar
  • Wilson JQ (1968) Varieties of Police Behavior: The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities (Cambridge University Press, London).Google Scholar
  • Wilson JQ (1989) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Zuckerman G (2009) The Greatest Trade Ever: Behind-the-Scenes Story of How John Paulson Defied Wall Street and Made Financial History (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.