Status Inertia and Member Replacement in Role-Differentiated Teams

References

• Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D, Kring AM (2001) Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81:116–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Ames DR, Gosling SD (2008) Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one’s status in a group. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34:90–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Gruenfeld D, Naquin C (2001) Group learning in organizations. Turner ME, ed. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 369–411.Google Scholar
• Arrow H, McGrath JE (1993) How member change and continuity affects small group structure, process, and performance. Small Group Res. 24:334–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker PM, Eaton GG (1992) Seniority versus age as causes of dominance in social groups: Macaques and men. Small Group Res. 23:322–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bales RF, Strodtbeck FL, Mills TM, Roseborough ME (1951) Channels of communication in small groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 16:461–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkwell JW (1991) From expectations to behavior: An improved postulate for expectation states theory. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 56:355–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51:1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer TN, Bodner T, Erdogan B, Truxillo DM, Tucker JS (2007) Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. J. Appl. Psych. 92:707–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Shah NP (2012) The cost of status enhancement: Performance effects of individuals’ status mobility in task groups. Organ. Sci. 23:308–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Fişek MH (2006) Diffuse status characteristics and the spread of status value: A formal theory. Amer. J. Sociol. 111:1038–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Webster M Jr (2006) Expectations, status, and behavior. Burke PJ, ed. Contemporary Social Psychological Theories (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 268–300.Google Scholar
• Berger J, Cohen BP, Zelditch M Jr (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37:241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Ridgeway CL, Zelditch M (2002) Construction of status and referential structures. Sociol. Theory 20:157–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Rosenholtz SJ, Zelditch M Jr (1980) Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6:479–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Fişek MH, Norman RZ, Zelditch M Jr (1977) Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach (Elsevier, New York).Google Scholar
• Berger J, Ridgeway CL, Fişek MH, Norman RZ (1998) The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63:379–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein IS (1969) Stability of the status hierarchy in a pigtail monkey group (Macaca nemestrina). Animal Behav. 17:452–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettencourt BA, Charlton K, Dorr N, Hume DL (2001) Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psych. Bull. 127:520–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese PD, Halverson RR (1998) Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICC values. J. Management 24:157–172.Google Scholar
• Bramblett CA, Bramblett SS, Bishop DA, Coelho AM (1982) Longitudinal stability in adult status hierarchies among vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Amer. J. Primatol. 2:43–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brescoll VL, Uhlmann EL (2008) Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psych. Sci. 19:268–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48:557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Barton MA (2011) Status cues and expertise assessment in groups: How group members size one another up … and why it matters. Pearce JL, ed. Status in Management and Organizations (Cambridge University Press, New York), 215–237.Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2003) Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88:552–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Beckman CM (2007) Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72:239–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G (2005) Newcomer adaptation in teams: Multilevel antecedents and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 48:101–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi HH, Levine JM (2004) Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40:273–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi H-S, Thompson L (2005) Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 98:121–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen BP, Zhou X (1991) Status processes in enduring work groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 56:179–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook KS (1975) Expectations, evaluations, and equity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 40:372–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delton AW, Cimino A (2010) Exploring the evolved concept of NEWCOMER: Experimental tests of a cognitive model. Evolutionary Psych. 8:317–335.Google Scholar
• Devine DJ, Clayton LD, Philips JL, Dunford BB, Melner SB (1999) Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Res. 30:678–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Dillon JR, Roloff KS (2007) Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Acad. Management Ann. 1:269–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JE (1994) The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 58:51–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisek MH, Ofshe R (1970) The process of status evolution. Sociometry 33:327–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43:58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1999) The effect of core change on performance: Inertia and regression toward the mean. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:590–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Nanda A, Nohria N (2004) The risky business of hiring stars. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(5):92–100.Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH, Martorana PV, Fan ET (2000) What do groups learn from their worldliest members? Direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82:45–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1995) Self-managed teams. Nicholson N, Schuler R, Van de Ven AH, eds. The Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Organizational Behavior (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA), 511–512.Google Scholar
• Hansen T, Levine JM (2009) Newcomers as change agents: Effects of newcomers’ behavioral style and teams’ performance optimism. Soc. Influence 4:46–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrod WJ (1980) Expectations from unequal rewards. Soc. Psych. Quart. 43:126–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausfater G, Altmann J, Altmann S (1982) Long-term consistency of dominance relations among female baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Science 217:752–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hembroff LA, Myers DE (1984) Status characteristics: Degrees of task relevance and decision processes. Soc. Psych. Quart. 47:337–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1950) The Human Group (Harcourt, Brace & Company, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Hornsey MJ, Grice T, Jetten J, Paulsen N, Callan V (2007) Group-directed criticisms and recommendations for change: Why newcomers arouse more resistance than old-timers. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33:1036–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrey R (1985) How work roles influence perception: Structural-cognitive processes and organizational behavior. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 50:242–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphreys P, Berger J (1981) Theoretical consequences of the status characteristics formulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 86:953–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hysom SJ (2009) Status valued goal objects and performance expectations. Soc. Forces 87:1623–1647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Insko CA, Thibaut JW, Moehle D, Wilson M, Diamond WD, Gilmore R, Solomon MR, Lipsitz A (1980) Social evolution and the emergence of leadership. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39:431–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR (1982) Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 67:219–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69:85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jussim L (1986) Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. Psych. Rev. 93:429–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalma A (1991) Hierarchisation and dominance assessment at first glance. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 21:165–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane AA, Argote L, Levine JM (2005) Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96:56–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JR Jr, Sargis EG, Elstein AS, Schwartz A (2002) Holding shared versus unshared information: Its impact on perceived member influence in decision-making groups. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 24:145–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine JM, Choi H-S (2004) Impact of personnel turnover on team performance and cognition. Salas E, Fiore SM, eds. Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 153–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luftig RL (1987) The stability of children’s peer social status over social situations. Education 107:417–423.Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Walsh JP, Brief AP, eds. The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 2 (Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, UK), 351–398.Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99:172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markovsky B, Smith LF, Berger J (1984) Do status interventions persist? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49:373–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MCC (1993) Management Game Manual (MCC International BV, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Liljenquist KA, Neale MA (2009) Is the pain worth the gain? The advantages and liabilities of agreeing with socially distinct newcomers. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 35:336–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42:185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pugh MD, Wahrman R (1983) Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? Amer. J. Sociol. 88:746–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70:367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2001) Social status and group structure. Hogg MA, Tindale RS, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 352–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Berger J (1986) Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51:603–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Erickson KG (2000) Creating and spreading status beliefs. Amer. J. Sociol. 106:579–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Berger J, Smith L (1985) Nonverbal cues and status: An expectation states approach. Amer. J. Sociol. 90:955–978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Boyle EH, Kuipers KJ, Robinson DT (1998) How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experience. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63:331–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Backor K, Li YE, Tinkler JE, Erickson KG (2009) How easily does a social difference become a status distinction? Gender matters. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74:44–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rink FA, Ellemers N (2009) Temporary versus permanent group membership: How the future prospects of newcomers affect newcomer acceptance and newcomer influence. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 35:764–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sachdev I, Bourhis RY (1987) Status differentials and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 17:277–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saks AM, Uggerslev KL, Fassina NE (2007) Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: A meta-analytic review and test of a model. J. Vocational Behav. 70:413–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sande GN, Ellard JH, Ross M (1986) Effect of arbitrarily assigned status labels on self-perceptions and social perceptions: The mere position effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50:684–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder M, Swann WB Jr (1978) Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 14:148–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart PA, Moore JC (1992) Wage disparities and performance expectations. Soc. Psych. Quart. 55:78–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt GS, Van de Vliert E (2005) Effects of skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams. J. Management 31:73–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster M Jr, Hysom SJ (1998) Creating status characteristics. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63:351–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whyte WF (1943) Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Ziller RC (1965) Toward a theory of open and closed groups. Psych. Bull. 64:164–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziller RC, Behringer RD (1960) Assimilation of the knowledgeable newcomer under conditions of group success and failure. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 60:288–291.Crossref, Google Scholar