Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837

References

  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Bai CE, Lu J, Tao Z (2006) Property rights protection and access to bank loans. Econom. Transition 14(4):611–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):794–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron DP (1995) Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. Calif. Management Rev. 37(2):47–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonardi JP, Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2005) The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):397–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonardi JP, Holburn GLF, Bergh RGV (2006) Nonmarket strategy performance: Evidence from U.S. electric utilities. Acad. Management J. 49(6):1209–1228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandt L, Li H (2003) Bank discrimination in transition economies: Ideology, information, or incentives? J. Comparative Econom. 31(3):387–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown AD (1998) Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation. J. Management Stud. 35(1):35–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):946–967.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carow K, Heron R, Saxton T (2004) Do early birds get the returns? An empirical investigation of early-mover advantages in acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 25(6):563–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W (2007) Does the color of the cat matter? The red hat strategy in China’s private enterprises. Management Organ. Rev. 3(1):55–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ChinaCSR.com (2009) How far can Chinese companies take corporate social responsibility? (February 23) http://www.chinacsr.com/en/2009/02/23/4572-how-far-can-chinese-companies-take-corporate-social-responsibility/.Google Scholar
  • China WTO Tribune (2009) Four discoveries of the research on CSR reports in China from 2001 to 2009. [In Chinese.] (December 2) http://www.wtoguide.net/Html/tbgz/06122515571068955091271627382793311.html.Google Scholar
  • Deephouse D, Suchman MC (2008) Legitimacy in organizational Institutionalism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin-Andersson K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 49–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickson BJ (2003) Red Capitalists in China: The Party, Private Entrepreneurs, and Prospects for Political Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F, Sutton FR (1998) The strength of a weak state: The rights revolution and the rise of human resources management divisions. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(2):441–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F, Schrage D, Kalev A (2009) Someone to watch over me: Coupling, decoupling, and unintended consequences in corporate equal opportunity. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Dobbin F, Sutton J, Meyer J, Scott WR (1993) Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 99:396–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eccles RG, Krzus MP (2010) One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J).Google Scholar
  • Edelman LB (1990) Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace. Amer. J. Sociol. 95:1401–1440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman LB (1992) Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. Amer. J. Sociol. 97:1531–1576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman LB, Suchman MC (1997) The legal environments of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 23:479–515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach KD, Sutton RI (1992) Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. 35(4):699–738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faccio M, Lang LHP (2002) The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. J. Financial Econom. 65(3):365–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faccio M, Masulis RW, McConnell JJ (2006) Political connections and corporate bailouts. J. Finance 61(6):2597–2635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan JPH, Wong TJ, Zhang T (2007) Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. J. Financial Econom. 84(2):330–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farashahi M, Hafsi T (2009) Strategy of firms in unstable institutional environments. Asia Pacific J. Management 26(4):643–666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein SM (1995) China in transition: The political foundations of incremental reform. China Quart. 144:1105–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W (2010) Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Econom. Lett. 107(2):291–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guthrie D (2009) China and Globalization: The Social, Economic and Political Transformation of Chinese Society, revised ed. (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
  • He Y, Tian Z (2008) Government-oriented corporate public relation strategies in transitional China. Management Organ. Rev. 4(3):367–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiatt S, Park S (2013) Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Acad. Management J. 56(4):923–944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman AJ (2003) Determinants of political strategies in U.S. multinationals. Bus. Soc. 42(4):455–484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman AJ (2005) Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? J. Management 31(3):464–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman AJ, Keim GD, Schuler D (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
  • Hillman AJ, Zardkoohi A, Bierman L (1999) Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management J. 20(1):67–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Kim H (1997) International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Acad. Management J. 40(4):767–798.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoetker G (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong Z (2004) Mapping the evolution and transformation of the new private entrepreneurs in China. J. Chinese Political Sci. 9(1):23–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang Y (2008) Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the State (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (2000) Did socialism fail to innovate? A natural experiment of the two Zeiss companies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(2):169–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • KPMG (2008) KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2008. Report, KPMG International, Amsterdam. http://www.kpmg.com/EU/en/Documents/KPMG_International_survey_Corporate_responsibility_Survey_Reporting_2008.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Kriauciunas A, Kale P (2006) The impact of socialist imprinting and search on resource change: A study of firms in Lithuania. Strategic Management J. 27(7):659–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. J. Finance 54(2):471–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) Law and finance. J. Political Econom. 106:1113–1155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Qian C (2013) Principal–principal conflicts under weak institutions: A study of corporate takeovers in China. Strategic Management J. 34(4):498–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Zhang Y (2007) The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management J. 28(8):791–804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Meng L, Zhang J (2006) Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China. Econom. Inquiry 44(3):559–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Meng L, Wang Q, Zhou LA (2008) Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. J. Development Econom. 87(2):283–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin LW (2010) Corporate social responsibility in China: Window dressing or structural change? Berkeley J. Internat. Law 28(1):64–100.Google Scholar
  • Lord MD (2000) Corporate political strategy and legislative decision making: The impact of corporate legislative influence activities. Bus. Soc. 39(1):76–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luo Y (2003) Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management J. 24(13):1315–1327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2011) Greenwash: Environmental disclosure under threat of audit. J. Econom. Management Strategy 20(1):3–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma D, Parish WL (2006) Tocquevillian moments: Charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Soc. Forces 85(2):943–964.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Huang Z (2010) Acquisitions as exaptation: The legacy of founding institutions in the U.S. commercial banking industry. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1441–1473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2013) Imprinting: Toward a multi-level theory. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):193–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Yin L, Yang D (2011) COSCO: Implementing sustainability HBS Case 412081, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Marquis C, Zhang J, Zhou Y (2011) Regulatory uncertainty and corporate responses to environmental protection in China. Calif. Management Rev. 54(1):39–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Dai N, Yang D, Wu H (2010) State grid: Corporate social responsibility HBS Case 410141, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer MW, Rowan B (1978) The structure of educational organizations. Meyer MW et al., eds. Environments and Organizations, 1st ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 78–109.Google Scholar
  • Mizruchi MS (1992) The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Naughton B (2007) The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Nee V (1992) Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1):1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norton EC, Wang H, Ai C (2004) Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata J. 4(2):154–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Brien KJ (1990) Reform Without Liberalization: China’s National People’s Congress and the Politics of Institutional Change (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhmatovskiy I, David RJ (2012) Setting your own standards: Internal corporate governance codes as a response to institutional pressure. Organ. Sci. 23(1):155–176.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver C, Holzinger I (2008) The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):496–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park S, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2011) Professions, organizations, and institutions: Tenure systems in colleges and universities. Work Occupations 38(3):340–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearce JL, De Castro JO, Guillen MF (2008) Influencing politics and political systems: Political systems and corporate strategies (introduction to special topic forum). Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):493–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng MW, Heath PS (1996) The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Acad. Management Rev. 21(2):492–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng MW, Luo Y (2000) Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Acad. Management J. 43(3):486–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng Y (2004) Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China’s transitional economy. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(5):1045–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Quasney TJ (2003) Competitive interaction: A study of market, nonmarket and integrated competitive behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  • Ryan TP (1997) Modern Regression Methods (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Saich T (2001) Governance and Politics of China (Palgrave, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schuler DA, Rehbein K (1997) The filtering role of the firm in corporate political involvement. Bus. Soc. 36(2):116–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schuler DA, Rehbein K, Cramer RD (2002) Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Acad. Management J. 45(4):659–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Scott WR (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd ed. (Sage, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • See G (2009) Harmonious society and Chinese CSR: Is there really a link? J. Bus. Ethics 89:1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seifert B, Morris SA, Bartkus BR (2004) Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Bus. Soc. 43(2):135–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short JL, Toffel MW (2010) Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):361–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel J (2007) Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):621–666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sino-Swedish CSR Cooperation (2009) Interpreting CSR policy for large Chinese SOEs. Press release (May 14), http://csr2.mofcom.gov.cn/article/laws/200905/20090506246453.shtml.Google Scholar
  • Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally & Co., Chicago), 142–193.Google Scholar
  • Tian Z, Hafsi T, Wu W (2009) Institutional determinism and political strategies. Bus. Soc. 48(3):284–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tilcsik A (2010) From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post-Communist government agency. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1474–1498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsui AS (2007) From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the academy and beyond. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1353–1364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management J. 18(4):303–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walder AG (1995) Local governments as industrial firms: An organizational analysis of China’s transitional economy. Amer. J. Sociol. 101(2):263–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walder AG (2000) China’s transitional economy. Li JT, Tsui AS, Weldon E, eds. Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context (St. Martin’s Press, New York), 63–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang H, Qian C (2011) Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Acad. Management J. 54(6):1159–1181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang H, Choi J, Li J (2008) Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):143–159.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Q, Wong TJ, Xia L (2008) State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. J. Accounting Econom. 46(1):112–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1994) Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term incentive plans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):367–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1995) Who shall govern? CEO/Board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):60–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (2001) Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):202–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xinhuanet.com (2011) Chinese ministry vows more transparency for charitable organizations. (July 15) http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-07/15/c_13988257.htm.Google Scholar
  • Yin G, Li W, Yu Z, Zheng R, Li W (2008) How to Write a CSR Report, Chinese ed. (Golden Bee Development Center for Chinese CSR/China WTO Tribune, Beijing).Google Scholar
  • Young MN, Peng MW, Ahlstrom D, Bruton GD, Jiang Y (2008) Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. J. Management Stud. 45(1):196–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (2004) The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):433–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhong HW (2009) Guidelines of Chinese Firms’ Social Reporting (CASS-CSR 1.0) (Economy and Management Publishing, Beijing).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.