Mood at the Midpoint: Affect and Change in Exploratory Search Over Time in Teams That Face a Deadline

References

• Anderson NR, De Dreu C, Nijstad B (2004) The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state of the science. J. Organ. Behav. 25:147–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer, Norwell, MA).Google Scholar
• Barsade SG (2002) The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47:644–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Gibson DE (2007) Why does affect matter in organizations? Acad. Management Perspect. 21:36–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Gibson DE (2012) Group affect: Its influence on individual and group outcomes. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 21(2):119–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Knight AP (2013) Group affect. Weiss H, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Work Attitudes and Affect (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK). Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Bartel CA, Saavedra R (2000) The collective construction of work group moods. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:197–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biesanz JC, Deeb-Sossa N, Papadakis A, Bollen K, Curran PJ (2004) The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psych. Methods 69(1):30–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese P (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein K, Kozlowski S, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
• Bliese P, Ployhart R (2002) Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organ. Res. Methods 5:362–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF (1990) Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psych. Rev. 97:19–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan D (1998a) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psych. 83:234–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan D (1998b) The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organ. Res. Methods 1:421–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G (2005) Newcomer adaptation in teams: Multilevel antecedents and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 48:101–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernick M (2011) Bootstrap Methods: A Practitioner’s Guide (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi K, Cho B (2011) Competing hypotheses analyses of the associations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict. J. Organ. Behav. 32:1106–1126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Weingart LR (2011) Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? Acad. Management Ann. 5:571–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damasio A (1994) Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (Grosset, New York).Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Dillon JR, Roloff KS (2007) Three perspectives on team learning. Acad. Management Ann. 6:269–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericksen J, Dyer L (2004) Right from the start?: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49:438–471.Google Scholar
• Ford C, Sullivan DM (2004) A time for everything: How the timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes. J. Organ. Behav. 25:279–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredrickson B (1998) What good are positive emotions? Rev. General Psych. 2:300–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• George J (1990) Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. J. Appl. Psych. 75:107–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George J (2011) Dual tuning: A minimum condition for understanding affect in organizations. Organ. Psych. Rev. 1:147–164.Google Scholar
• George J, Brief A (1996) Motivational agendas in the workplace: The effects of feelings on focus of attention and work motivation. Staw B, Cummings L, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 18 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 75–110.Google Scholar
• George J, Zhou J (2002) Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. J. Appl. Psych. 87:687–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C (1988) Time and transition in work teams: Toward a model of group development. Acad. Management J. 31:9–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C (1989) Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Acad. Management J. 32:274–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C (1991) Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad. Management Rev. 16:10–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C (1994) Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Acad. Management J. 37:9–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C, Hackman J (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47:65–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C, Vermeulen F (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48:202–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grawitch MJ, Munz DC, Kramer TJ (2003) Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res., Practice 7:41–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grawitch MJ, Munz DC, Elliott EK, Mathis A (2003) Promoting creativity in temporary problem-solving groups: The effects of positive mood and autonomy in problem definition on idea-generating performance. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res., Practice 7:200–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J (1987) The design of work teams. Lorsch J, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 315–342.Google Scholar
• Hackman J, Katz N (2010) Group behavior and performance Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 1208–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirt ER, Devers EE, McCrea SM (2008) I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94:645–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirt ER, Melton RJ, McDonald HE, Harackiewicz JM (1996) Processing goals, task interest, and the mood-performance relationship: A mediational analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71:245–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirt ER, Levine GM, McDonald HE, Melton RJ, Martin LL (1997) The role of mood in quantitative and qualitative aspects of performance: Single or multiple mechanisms? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 33:602–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Gavin MB (1998) Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. J. Management 24:623–641.Google Scholar
• Hülsheger UR, Anderson N, Salgado JF (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J. Appl. Psych. 94:1128–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isen AM, Daubman KA, Nowicki GP (1987) Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52:1122–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishak AW, Ballard DI (2012) Time to re-group: A typology and nested phase model for action teams. Small Group Res. 43:3–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69:85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janssen O, van de Vliert E, West M (2004) The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. J. Organ. Behav. 25:129–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Bendersky C (2003) Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Staw BM, Kramer RM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 187–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Mannix EA (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. 44:238–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones EE, Kelly JR (2009) No pain, no gains: Negative mood leads to process gains in idea-generation groups. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res., Practice 13:75–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly JR, Barsade SG (2001) Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 86:99–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein K, Bliese P, Kozlowski Set al. (2000) Multilevel analytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. Klein K, Kozlowski S, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 512–553.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S, Klein K (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Klein K, Kozlowski S, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 3–90.Google Scholar
• Larsen R, Diener E (1992) Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. Clark MS, ed. Emotion (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 25–59.Google Scholar
• March J (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2:71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March J, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26:356–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin L, Stoner P (1996) Mood as input: What we think about how we feel determines how we think. Martin LL, Tesser A, eds. Striving and Feeling: Interactions Among Goals, Affect, and Self-Regulation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 279–301.Google Scholar
• Martin L, Abend T, Sedikides C, Green JG (1997) How would I feel if …? Mood as input to a role fulfillment evaluation process. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73:242–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin L, Ward D, Achee J, Wyer R (1993) Mood as input?: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64:317–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Rapp TL (2009) Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. J. Appl. Psych. 94:90–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Schulze W (2006) The influence of team knowledge and formal plans on episodic team process-performance relationships. Acad. Management J. 49:605–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1986) Studying groups at work: Ten critical needs for theory and practice. Goodman P, ed. Designing Effective Work Groups (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 362–392.Google Scholar
• Meeten F, Davey GCL (2011) Mood-as-input hypothesis and perseverative psychopathologies. Clinical Psych. Rev. 31:1259–1275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TR, James LR (2001) Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Acad. Management Rev. 26:530–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr J (2004) Gasping for Airtime: Two Years in the Trenches of Saturday Night Live (Hyperion, New York).Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Waller MJ (2002) Focusing on midpoint transitions: An analysis of boundary conditions. Acad. Management J. 45:1056–1065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ployhart RE, Vandenberg RJ (2009) Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. J. Management 36:94–120.Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Curran PJ, Bauer DJ (2006) Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. J. Ed. Behav. Statist. 31:437–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee S, Yoon H (2012) Shared positive affect in workgroups. Cameron K, Spreitzer G, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 215–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanna LJ, Turley KJ, Mark MM (1996) Expected evaluation, goals, and performance: Mood as input. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22:323–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N (2012) Feelings-as-information theory. Van Lange P, Kruglanski A, Higgins E, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, Vol. 1 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 289–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Clore G (1983) Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45:513–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Clore G (1996) Feelings and phenomenal experiences. Higgins E, Kruglanski A, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (Guilford, New York), 433–465.Google Scholar
• Seers A, Woodruff S (1997) Temporal pacing in task forces: Group development or deadline pressure? J. Management 23:169–187.Google Scholar
• Shales T, Miller JA (2002) Live from New York: An Uncensored History of Saturday Night Live (Back Bay Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Shteynberg G, Hirsh JB, Galinsky AD, Knight AP (2014) Shared attention increases mood infusion. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 143:123–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1967) Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psych. Rev. 74:29–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staudenmayer N, Tyre M, Perlow L (2002) Time to change: Temporal shifts as enablers of organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13:583–597.Link, Google Scholar
• Sy T, Côté S, Saavedra R (2005) The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. J. Appl. Psych. 90:295–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Totterdell P, Kellett S, Teuchmann K, Briner RB (1998) Evidence of mood linkage in work groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74:1504–1515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Beersma B, van Knippenberg D, van Knippenberg B, Damen F (2009) Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Acad. Management J. 52:562–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Kooij-de Bode HJM, van Ginkel WP (2010) The interactive effects of mood and trait negative affect in group decision making. Organ. Sci. 21:731–744.Link, Google Scholar
• Vaughn LA, Malik J, Schwartz S, Petkova Z, Trudeau L (2006) Regulatory fit as input for stop rules. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91:601–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waller MJ, Zellmer-Bruhn ME, Giambatista RC (2002) Watching the clock: Group pacing behavior under dynamic deadlines. Acad. Management J. 45:1046–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark L, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54:1063–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss HM (2002) Conceptual and empirical foundations for the study of affect at work. Lord R, Klimoski R, Kanfer R, eds. Emotions in the Workplace: Understanding the Structure and Role of Emotions in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 20–63.Google Scholar
• West M (2002) Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation within groups. Appl. Psych.: Internat. Rev. 51:355–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West M, Farr J (1990) Innovation at work. West M, Farr J, eds. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 3–13.Google Scholar
• Wong S (2004) Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions. Organ. Sci. 15:645–656.Link, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW (1998) Effects of intervention content and timing on group task performance. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 34:30–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW (2009) Means vs. ends: Implications of process and outcome focus for team adaptation and performance. Organ. Sci. 20:500–515.Link, Google Scholar
• Zajonc R (1980) Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. Amer. Psychologist 35:151–175.Crossref, Google Scholar