Built to Last or Meant to End: Intertemporal Choice in Strategic Alliance Portfolios

References

• Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1988) Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(4):678–690.Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Polidoro F, Mitchell W (2009) Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic Management J. 30(9):941–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Soda G, Zaheer A (2012) Introduction to the special issue: The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. 23(2):434–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Chong CL (1996) Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 18 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 251–284.Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Goodman PS, Lawrence BS, Tushman ML (2001) Time: A new research lens. Acad. Management Rev. 26(4):645–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axelrod R (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Bakker RM (2010) Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda. Internat. J. Management Rev. 12(4):466–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakker RM, Boros S, Kenis P, Oerlemans LAG (2013) It’s only temporary: Time frame and the dynamics of creative project teams. British J. Management 24(3):383–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkema HG, Shenkar O, Vermeulen F, Bell JHJ (1997) Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Acad. Management J. 40(2):426–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP (1997) The dynamics of competitive intensity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):128–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bascle G (2008) Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 6(3):285–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21(3):267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Haunschild PR, Phillips DJ (2004) Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. 15(3):259–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Belderbos R, Gilsing V, Lokshin B (2012) Persistence of, and interrelation between, horizontal and vertical technology alliances. J. Management 38(6):1812–1834.Google Scholar
• Bowen HP, Wiersema MF (2004) Modeling limited dependent variables: Methods and guidelines for researchers in strategic management. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Vol. 1 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 87–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd B (1990) Corporate linkages and the organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management J. 11(6):419–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai WP (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. 47(6):795–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The Management of Innovation (Quadrangle Books, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Li M, Jiang H (2012) Social network research in organizational contexts: A systematic review of methodological issues and choices. J. Management 38(4):1328–1361.Google Scholar
• Cool K, Dierickx I (1993) Rivalry, strategic groups and firm profitability. Strategic Management J. 14(1):47–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das TK (2006) Strategic alliance temporalities and partner opportunism. British J. Management 17(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1973) Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. J. Law Econom. 16(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G, Beard D (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):52–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickson PH, Weaver KM (1997) Environmental determinants and individual-level moderators of alliance use. Acad. Management J. 40(2):404–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doz YL (1996) The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management J. 17(S1):55–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dussauge P, Garrette B, Mitchell W (2000) Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management J. 21(2):99–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes—Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiebig DG (2001) Seemingly unrelated regression. Baltagi BH, ed. A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 101–121.Google Scholar
• Grabher G (2002) Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Stud. 36(3):205–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2008) Multimarket contact and sales growth: Evidence from insurance. Strategic Management J. 29(3):229–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Baum JAC, Mitsuhashi H, Rowley TJ (2010) Built to last but falling apart: Cohesion, friction, and withdrawal from interfirm alliances. Acad. Management J. 53(2):302–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. 19(4):293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrigan K (1986) Managing for Joint Venture Success (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
• Heide JB, Miner AS (1992) The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer–seller cooperation. Acad. Management J. 35(2):265–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennart JF (1988) A transaction cost theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management J. 9(4):361–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Keats BW, DeMarie SM (1998) Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Acad. Management Executive 12(4):22–42.Google Scholar
• Hoffmann WH (2007) Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management J. 28(8):827–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inkpen AC, Beamish PW (1997) Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Acad. Management Rev. 22(1):177–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C, Lichtenstein B (2008) Temporary inter-organizational projects: How temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainty. Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Smith Ring P, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 231–255.Google Scholar
• Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management J. 21(3):217–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoben J, Weterings A (2010) Employment dynamics on business estates. Eur. Planning Stud. 18(7):1077–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B (1988) Joint ventures—Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management J. 9(4):319–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B (1989) The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. J. Indust. Econom. 38(2):183–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koka BR, Madhavan R, Prescott JE (2006) The evolution of interfirm networks: Environmental effects on patterns of network change. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):721–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan R, Martin X, Noorderhaven NG (2006) When does trust matter to alliance performance? Acad. Management J. 49(5):894–917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1187–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Rosenkopf L (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):797–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Lechner C, Singh H (2007) The performance implications of timing of entry and involvement in multipartner alliances. Acad. Management J. 50(3):578–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(8):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long JS, Freese J (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• McCarthy IP, Lawrence TB, Wixted B, Gordon BR (2010) A multidimensional conceptualization of environmental velocity. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):604–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyerson D, Weick KE, Kramer RM (1996) Swift trust and temporary groups. Kramer RM, Tyler TR, eds. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 166–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles RE, Snow CC, Pfeffer J (1974) Organization-environment: Concepts and issues. Indust. Relations 13(3):244–264.Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Nadkarni S (2011) Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership. Acad. Management J. 54(3):489–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulhern A (1995) The SME sector in Europe: A broad perspective. J. Small Bus. Management 33(3):83–87.Google Scholar
• Olk P (2002) Evaluating strategic alliance performance. Contractor FJ, Lorange P, eds. Cooperative Strategies and Alliances (Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK), 119–143.Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1997) Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: The “Oslo Manual” (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris).Google Scholar
• Oxley JE (1997) Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 13(2):387–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network, strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papalia RB, Di Iorio F (2001) Alternative error term specification in the log–Tobit model. Borra S, Rocci R, Schader M, Vichi M, eds. Advances in Classification and Data Analysis (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany), 185–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A (1991) Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 22(4):579–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad. Management J. 36(4):794–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F, Ahuja G, Mitchell W (2011) When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Acad. Management J. 54(1):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zhou KZ, Ryu S (2008) Alternative origins to interorganizational trust: An interdependence perspective on the shadow of the past and the shadow of the future. Organ. Sci. 19(1):39–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Chammah A (1965) Prisoner’s Dilemma (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Ariño A (2007) Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management J. 28(3):313–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Ragozzino R (2006) Agency hazards and alliance portfolios. Strategic Management J. 27(1):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Ring DS, Van de Ven AH (1992) Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management J. 13(7):483–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Schilling MA (2007) Comparing alliance network structure across industries: Observations and explanations. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(3–4):191–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2009) Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management J. 30(3):233–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwab A, Miner AS (2008) Learning in hybrid-project systems: The effect of project performance on repeated collaboration. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1117–1149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwab A, Miner AS (2011) Organizational learning implications of partnering flexibility in project-venture settings: A multilevel framework. Cattani G, Ferriani S, Frederiksen L, Täube F, eds. Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 115–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steensma HK, Marino L, Weaver KM, Dickson PH (2000) The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. 43(5):951–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21(8):791–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Lindkvist L, DeFillippi R (2004) Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge: Editorial. Organ. Stud. 25(9):1475–1489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Telser LG (1980) A theory of self-enforcing agreements. J. Bus. 53(1):27–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (2003) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, reprint ed. (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Van Stel AJ, Nieuwenhuijsen HR (2004) Knowledge spillovers and economic growth: An analysis using data of Dutch regions in the period 1987–1995. Regional Stud. 38(4):393–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volberda HW (1996) Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. 7(4):359–374.Link, Google Scholar
• Wassmer U (2010) Alliance portfolios: A review and research agenda. J. Management 36(1):141–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber L, Mayer KJ, Macher JT (2011) An analysis of extendibility and early termination provisions: The importance of framing duration safeguards. Acad. Management J. 54(1):182–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Young-Ybarra C, Wiersema M (1999) Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: The influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theory. Organ. Sci. 10(4):439–459.Link, Google Scholar