An Inductively Generated Typology and Process Model of Workplace Courage

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0928

References

  • Andersson L, Pearson C (1999) Tit-for-tat: The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 24:452–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M (2008) Identity incentives as an engaging form of control: Revisiting leniencies in an aeronautic plant. Organ. Sci. 19:202–220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 20–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashford SJ, Taylor MS (1990) Adaptation to work transitions: An integrative approach. Ferris GR, Rowland KM, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 8 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–39.Google Scholar
  • Augustin (1887) On the morals of the Catholic Church. Schaff P, ed. St. Augustin: The Writings Against the Manichæans, and Against the Donatists, A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Vol. 4 (Christian Literature Publishing, Buffalo, NY), 41–63. [Orig. pub. 388.].Google Scholar
  • Avolio BJ, Gardner WL, Walumbwa FO, Luthans F (2004) Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quart. 15:801–823.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bansal PT, Corley K (2012) From the editors. The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Acad. Management J. 54:233–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker SW, Eagly AH (2004) The heroism of women and men. Amer. Psych. 59:163–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowlby J (1990) A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Human Development (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bradfield M, Aquino K (1999) The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. J. Management 25:607–631.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brothers LA (1989) A biological perspective on empathy. Amer. J. Psych. 146:10–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and timepaced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bryman A (2004) Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. Leadership Quart. 15:729–769.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butterfield KD, Trevino LK, Ball GA (1996) Punishment from the manager’s perspective: A grounded investigation and inductive model. Acad. Management J. 39:1479–1512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE (2003) Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Carver CS, Scheier MF (1998) On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carver CS, Scheier MF (1999) Themes and issues in the self-regulation of behavior. Wyer RS Jr, ed. Advances in Social Cognition, Vol. 12 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 1–105.Google Scholar
  • Cavanagh GF, Moberg DJ (1999) The virtue of courage within the organization. Pava ML, Primeaux P, eds. Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations (JAI Press, Stamford, CT), 1–25.Google Scholar
  • Chan A, Hannah ST, Gardner WL (2005) Veritable authentic leadership: Emergence, functioning, and impacts. Gardner WB, Avolio BJ, Walumbwa FO, eds. Authentic Leadership Theory and Practice: Origins, Effects, and Development (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 3–42.Google Scholar
  • Chiu RK (2003) Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: examining the moderating role of locus of control. J. Bus. Ethics 43:65–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooren F (2000) The Organizing Property of Communication (John Benjamins, Amsterdam).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox D, Hallam R, O’Connor K, Rachman S (1983) An experimental analysis of fearlessness and courage. British J. Psych. 74:107–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croizet JC, Claire T (1998) Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 24:588–594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darley JM, Latané B (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 8:377–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (1987) The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 53:1024–1037.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delbridge R, Fiss P (2013) Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Acad. Management Rev. 38:325–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Detert JR (2003) Connecting the links of the chain: A multi-level analysis of leadership influences on employee voice. Presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Seattle.Google Scholar
  • Detert JR, Edmondson AC (2005) No exit, no voice: The bind of risky voice opportunities in organizations. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Honolulu.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deutsch M (1961) Courage as a concept in social psychology. J. Soc. Psych. 55:49–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dieterly DL, Schneider B (1974) The effect of organizational environment on perceived power and climate: A laboratory study. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 11:316–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Ashford SJ (1993) Selling issues to top management. Acad. Management Rev. 18:397–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Worline M, Frost PJ, Lilius J (2006) Explaining compassion organizing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51:59–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dworkin TM, Baucus MS (1998) Internal vs, external whistle-blowers: A comparison of the whistleblowing processes. J. Bus. Ethics 17:1281–1298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. 40:1419–1452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32:1155–1179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:685–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards M, Ashkanasy NM, Gardner J (2009) Deciding to speak up or to remain silent following observed wrongdoing: The role of discrete emotions and climate of silence. Greenberg J, Edwards MS, eds. Voice and Silence in Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 83–111.Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14:532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach KD, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Defining who you are by what you’re not: Organizational disidentification and the National Rifle Association. Organ. Sci. 12:393–413.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:229–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans PD, White DG (1981) Towards an empirical definition of courage. Behav. Res. Therapy 19:419–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fagin-Jones F, Midlarsky E (2007) Courageous altruism: Personal and situational correlates of rescue during the holocaust. J. Positive Psych. 2:136–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faunce T, Bolsin S, Chan WP (2004) Supporting whistleblowers in academic medicine: Training and respecting the courage of professional conscience. J. Medical Ethics 30:40–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felps W, Mitchell TR, Byington E (2006) How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 175–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finfgeld DL (1999) Courage as a process of pushing beyond the struggle. Qualitative Health Res. 9:803–814.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psych. Bull. 51:327–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fletcher GJO (1983) The analysis of verbal explanations for marital separation: Implications for attribution theory. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 13:245–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredin AJ (2011) The effects of anticipated regret on the whistleblowing decision. Ethics Behav. 21:404–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman J, Carroll GR, Hannan MT (1983) The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48:692–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frese M, Kring W, Soose A, Zempel J (1996) Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Acad. Management J. 39:37–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frijda NH (1986) The Emotions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Frijda NH, Kuipers P, Ter Schure E (1989) Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57:212–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick CJ (1989) Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Acad. Management J. 32:274–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16:15–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould NH (2005) Courage: Its nature and development. J. Humanistic Counseling, Ed. Development 33:102–116.Google Scholar
  • Graham JW (1986) Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Cummings LL, Staw BW, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–52.Google Scholar
  • Grant AM, Ashford SJ (2008) The dynamics of proactivity at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:3–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Dutton JE, Rosso BD (2008) Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Acad. Management J. 51:898–918.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greimas AJ (1987) On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
  • Griffith TL (1999) Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Acad. Management Rev. 24:472–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruenfeld DH, Keltner DJ, Anderson C (2003) The effects of power on those who possess it: How social structure can affect social cognition. Bodenhausen G, Lambert A, eds. Foundations of Social Cognition: A Festschrift in Honor of Robert S. Wyer, Jr. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 237–261.Google Scholar
  • Gundlach MJ, Martinko MJ, Douglas SC (2008) A new approach to examining whistle-blowing: The influence of cognitions and anger. SAM Advanced Management J. 73:40–50.Google Scholar
  • Haase J (1987) Components of courage in chronically ill adolescents: A phenomenological study. Adv. Nursing Sci. 9:64–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psych. Rev. 108:814–834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannah ST, Sweeney PJ, Lester PB (2007) Toward a courageous mindset: The subjective act and experience of courage. J. Positive Psych. 2:129–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris SG (1994) Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective. Organ. Sci. 5:309–321.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Henik E (2006) A fresh look at whistle-blowing predictors: The effect of moral intensity on judgments and intensions. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Higgins ET (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain. Amer. Psych. 52:1280–1300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET (1998) Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 30:1–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holtzworth-Munroe A, Jacobson NS (1985) Causal attributions of married couples: When do they search for causes? What do they conclude when they do? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48:1398–1412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz D, Kahn RL (1966) Organizations and the system concept. Soc. Psych. Organ. 1:14–29.Google Scholar
  • Keenan JP (2000) Blowing the whistle on less serious forms of fraud: A study of executives and managers. Employee Responsibilities Rights J. 12:199–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110:265–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kidder RM (2003) Moral Courage (William Morrow and Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Koerner M (2014) Courage as identity work: Accounts of workplace courage. Acad. Management J. 57:63–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacayo R, Ripley A (2002) Persons of the Year 2002: The whistleblowers Cynthia Cooper, Coleen Rowley and Sherron Watkins. Time 160(December 30–January 6):24.Google Scholar
  • Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler S (2002) Narrative in Social Research, Qualitative Research in Action (Sage, London), 242–259.Google Scholar
  • Lee TW (1999) Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • LePine JA, Van Dyne L (1998) Predicting voice behavior in work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 83:853–868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh J (2012) Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Acad. Management J. 55:71–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu D, Liao H, Loi R (2012) The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Acad. Management J. 55:1187–1212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahoney J (1998) Cultivating moral courage in business. Bus. Ethics: A Eur. Rev. 7:187–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maitlis S, Sonenshein S (2010) Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). J. Management Stud. 47:551–580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mawritz MB, Mayer DM, Hoobler JM, Wayne SJ, Marinova SV (2012) A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psych. 65:325–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McMillan TM, Rachman SJ (1987) Fearlessness and courage: A laboratory study of paratrooper veterans of the Falklands War. British J. Psych. 78:375–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McMillan TM, Rachman SJ (1988) Fearlessness and courage in paratroopers undergoing training. Personality Individual Differences 9:373–378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miceli MP, Near JP (1992) Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees (Lexington, New York).Google Scholar
  • Miller WI (2000) The Mystery of Courage (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Morgeson FP (2005) The external leadership of self-managed teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. J. Applied Psych. 90:497–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison EW (2006) Doing the job well: An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. J. Management 32:5–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison EW, Phelps CC (1999) Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad. Management J. 42:403–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mosser DM, Edwards JP (2008) Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nature Rev. Immunol. 8:958–969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orbuch TL (1997) People’s accounts count: The sociology of accounts. Annual Rev. Sociol. 23:455–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly J, Aquino K (2011) A model of third parties' morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 36:526–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly K, Marx S (2012) Demystifying grounded theory for business research. Organ. Res. Methods 15:247–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozkaptan H (1994) Determinants of courage. Holz RF, Hiller JH, McFann HH, eds. Determinants of Effective Unit Performance: Research on Measuring and Managing Unit Training Readiness (U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA), 233–245.Google Scholar
  • Pentland BT (1999) Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Acad. Management Rev. 24:711–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson C, Seligman MEP (2004) Character Strengths and Virtues: A Classification and Handbook (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Phillips C (2004) Six Questions of Socrates (W.W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pitesa M, Thau S (2013) Compliant sinners, obstinate saints? How power and self-focus determine the effectiveness of unethical social influences. Acad. Management J. 56:635–658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plato (2014) Laches. The Dialogues of Plato, Vol. 1, translated by Jowett B, Good Time Classic Book Collection (CreateSpace, Seattle). [Orig. pub. 380 BCE.]Google Scholar
  • Porath CL, Erez A (2009) Overlooked but not untouched: How rudeness reduces onlookers' performance on routine and creative tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 109:29–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Potterfield T (1999) The Business of Employee Empowerment (Quorum Books, London).Google Scholar
  • Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB (2006) Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad. Management J. 49:235–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pury CLS, Kowalski RM (2007) Human strengths, courageous actions, and general and personal courage. J. Positive Psych. 2:120–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pury CLS, Kowalski RM, Spearman J (2007) Distinctions between general and personal courage. J. Positive Psych. 2:99–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putman D (2004) Psychological Courage (University Press of America, Dallas).Google Scholar
  • Quinn RW, Worline MC (2008) Enabling courageous collective action: Conversations from United Airlines Flight 93. Organ. Sci. 19:497–516.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rachman S, ed. (1983) Fear and Courage in Military Bomb-Disposal Operators (Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Rafaeli A (1989) When cashiers meet customers: An analysis of the role of supermarket cashiers. Acad. Management J. 32:245–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rate CR, Clarke JA, Lindsay DR, Sternberg RJ (2007) Implicit theories of courage. J. Positive Psych. 2:80–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rayner C, McIvor KM (2006) Problem? What problem? Issues of silence and voice in managing bullying conflicts at work. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Rorty AO (1986) The two faces of courage. Philosophy 61:151–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothschild J, Miethe TD (1999) WhistleBlower disclosures and management retaliation. Work Occupations 26:107–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwan G (2004) Civil courage and human dignity: How to regain respect for the fundamental values of Western democracy. Soc. Res. 71:107–116.Google Scholar
  • Sekerka LE, Bagozzi RP (2007) Moral courage in the workplace: Moving to and from the desire and decision to act. Bus. Ethics: A Eur. Rev. 16:132–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaffer LF (1947) Fear and courage in aerial combat. J. Consulting Psych. 11:137–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheeran P, Orbell S (1999) Implementation intentions and repeated behaviour: Augmenting the predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 29:349–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shelp EE (1984) Courage: A neglected virtue in the patient-physician relationship. Soc. Sci. Medicine 18:351–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Šiklová J (2004) Courage, heroism, and the postmodern paradox. Soc. Res. 71:135–148.Google Scholar
  • Sims RL, Keenan JP (1998) Predictors of external whistleblowing: Organizational and intrapersonal variables. J. Bus. Ethics 17:411–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spreitzer GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 38:1442–1465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spreitzer GM, Sonenshein S (2003) Positive deviance and extraordinary organizing. Cameron K, Dutton J, Quinn R, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco), 207–224.Google Scholar
  • Sutton RI, Rafaeli A (1988) Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: The case of convenience stores. Acad. Management J. 31:461–487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Symons CS, Johnson BT (1997) The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 121:371–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szagun G, Schauble M (1997) Children’s and adults' understanding of the feeling experience of courage. Cognition Emotion. 11:291–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas JP, Whitman DS, Viswesvaran C (2010) Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. J. Occupation. Organ. Psych. 83:275–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treviño LK, Victor B (1992) Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Acad. Management J. 35:38–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Umphress EE, Bingham JB, Mitchell MS (2010) Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. J. Applied Psych. 95:769–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Army (1999) Army leadership: Be, know, do. Field Manual 22-100, U.S. Army, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Vaara E (2003) Post-acquisition integration as sensemaking: Glimpses of ambiguity, confusion, hypocrisy, and politicization. J. Management Studies 40:859–894.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Dyne L, Ang S, Botero IC (2003) Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. J. Management Studies 40:1359–1392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Victor B, Trevino LK, Shapiro DL (1993) Peer reporting of unethical behavior: The influence of justice evaluations and social context factors. J. Bus. Ethics 12:253–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker LJ, Hennig KH (2004) Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just, brave, and caring. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86:629–647.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waller MJ, Roberts KH (2003) High reliability and organizational behavior: Finally the twain must meet. J. Organ. Behavior 24:813–814.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1988) Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. J. Management Stud. 25:305–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations, Vol. 3 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Weiss HM, Cropanzano R (1996) Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 18 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–74.Google Scholar
  • Wheeler MA, Stuss DT, Tulving E (1997) Toward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness. Psych. Bull. 121:331–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams J (2002) Eyes on the Prize: America’s Civil Rights Years, 1954–1965 (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Woodard CR, Pury CLS (2007) The construct of courage: Categorization and measurement. Consulting Psych. J.: Practice Res. 59:135–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Worline MC (2004a) Bravery [valor]. Peterson VC, Seligman M, eds. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification (Oxford University Press, New York), 213–228.Google Scholar
  • Worline MC (2004b) Dancing the cliff edge: The role of courage in social life. Unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  • Worline MC, Quinn RE (2003) Courageous principled action. Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco), 138–158.Google Scholar
  • Worline MC, Wrzesniewski A, Rafaeli A (2002) Courage in work performance. Klimoski R, Lord R, eds. Emotion and Work Performance (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 295–331.Google Scholar
  • Yin R (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
  • Zander A, Forward J (1968) Position in group, achievement motivation, and group aspirations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 8:282–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeelenberg M, van Dijk WW, Manstead ASR (1998) Reconsidering the relation between regret and responsibility. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 74:254–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.