Supervising Across Borders: The Case of Multinational Hierarchies

References

• Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J (2006) Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Sci. 52(10):1457–1471.Link, Google Scholar
• Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
• Alfaro L, Charlton A (2009) Intra-industry foreign direct investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):2096–2119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambos TC, Andersson U, Birkinshaw J (2010) What are the consequences of initiative taking in multinational subsidiaries? J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(6):1099–1118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Gatignon H (1986) Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 17(3):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antràs P, Desai MA, Foley CF (2009) Multinational firms, FDI flows, and imperfect capital markets. Quart. J. Econom. 124(3): 1171–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Bigelow L (2010) Innovation, modularity, and vertical deintegration: Evidence from the early U.S. auto industry. Organ. Sci. 21(4):842–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1959) Rational choice functions and orderings. Economica 26(102):121–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY (2008) Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms: A synthesis. Indust. Corporate Change 17(1):155–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1987) Managing across borders: New organizational responses. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 29(1):43–54.Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1989) Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Benito GRG, Lunnan R, Tomassen S (2011) Distant encounters of the third kind: Multinational companies locating divisional headquarters abroad. J. Management Stud. 48(2):373–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural-change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Hood N (1998) Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):773–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Braunerhjelm P, Holm U, Terjesen S (2006) Why do some multinational corporations relocate their headquarters overseas? Strategic Management J. 27(7):681–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Reenen JV (2012) The organization of firms across countries. Quart. J. Econom. 127(4):1663–1705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouquet C, Birkinshaw J (2008) Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Acad. Management J. 51(3):577–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caves RE (1996) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Chang S-J, Park S (2005) Types of firms generating network externalities and MNCs’ co-location decisions. Strategic Management J. 26(7):595–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang S-J, Rosenzweig PM (2001) The choice of entry mode in sequential foreign direct investment. Strategic Management J. 22(8):747–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chozick A, Shirouzu N (2007) GM slips into Toyota’s rearview mirror. Wall Street Journal (April 25) http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB117739853275580259.Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Demirgüç-Kunt A, Maksimovic V (1998) Law, finance, and firm growth. J. Finance 53(6):2107–2137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai MA, Foley CF, Hines J Jr (2004) Foreign direct investment in a world of multiple taxes. J. Public Econom. 88(12):2727–2744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunning JH (2001) The key literature on IB activities: 1960–2000. Rugman AM, Brewer TL, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Business (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 36–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR, Bower JL (2000) The entrepreneurial M-form: Strategic integration in global media firms. Organ. Sci. 11(3):348–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Enright MJ (2000) Regional clusters and multinational enterprises: Independence, dependence, or interdependence? Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 30(2):114–138.Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D, Roy RR (2008) The dual role of modularity: Innovation and imitation. Management Sci. 54(5):939–955.Link, Google Scholar
• Fan JPH, Lang LHP (2000) The measurement of relatedness: An application to corporate diversification. J. Bus. 73(4):629–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford Motor Company (2007) Ford Motor Company annual report 2006. Report, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI. http://corporate.ford.com/doc/2006_AR.pdf.Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (2000) Designing the Global Corporation (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR, Lawler EE (1993) Organizing for the Future (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Garcia-Pont C, Nohria N (2002) Local versus global mimetism: The dynamics of alliance formation in the automobile industry. Strategic Management J. 23(4):307–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gates SR, Egelhoff WG (1986) Centralization in headquarters-subsidiary relationships. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 17(2):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelos RG, Wei S-J (2005) Transparency and international portfolio holdings. J. Finance 60(6):2987–3020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (2007) Redefining Global Strategy: Crossing Borders in a World Where Differences Still Matter (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Govindarajan V, Wang H (2008) The Quest for Global Dominance: Transforming Global Presence into Global Competitive Advantage (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Harris M, Raviv A (2005) Allocation of decision-making authority. Rev. Finance 9(3):353–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (2005) On the design of hierarchies: Coordination versus specialization. J. Political Econom. 113(4):675–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hass MR (2010) The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Acad. Management J. 53(5):989–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL (2012) International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York).Google Scholar
• Hines JR Jr, Rice EM (1994) Fiscal paradise: Foreign tax havens and american business. Quart. J. Econom. 109(1):149–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holburn GLF, Zelner BA (2010) Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power generation industry. Strategic Management J. 31(12):1290–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hummels D, Ishii J, Yi K-M (2001) The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. J. Internat. Econom. 54(1):75–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2010) The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5430, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Choudhury P (2007) Microsoft in China and India, 1993–2007. HBS Case 9-708-444, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu K (2000) Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. J. Finance 55(2):867–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kobrin SJ (2001) Sovereignty@bay: Globalization, multinational enterprise, and the international political system. Rugman AM, Brewer TL, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Business (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 181–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B (1983) Foreign direct investment as a sequential process. Kindleberger CP, Audretsch D, eds. The Multinational Corporation in the 1980s (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 38–56.Google Scholar
• Kumar KB, Rajan RG, Zingales L (2001) What determines firm size? CEPR Working paper, Center for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Miller DJ (2003) An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management J. 24(9):839–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LexisNexis (2005) Content FAQs. Accessed September 15, 2005, http://www.corporateaffiliations.com/nonsub/aboutContentFAQ.asp.Google Scholar
• Luxner L (2001) Procter & Gamble decided to consolidate its back-office operations for all the Americas in one place. Latin CEO: Executive Strategies Americas (April) http://www.ticonet.co.cr/costa-rica/readings/0104.html.Google Scholar
• Malone TW, Crowston K (2001) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. Olson GM, Malone TW, Smith JB, eds. Coordination Theory and Collaboration Technology, Computers, Cognition, and Work (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 7–50.Google Scholar
• Marschak J, Radner R (1972) Economic Theory of Teams (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Martinez JI, Jarillo JC (1989) The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 20(3):489–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteiro LF, Arvidsson N, Birkinshaw J (2008) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organ. Sci. 19(1): 90–107.Link, Google Scholar
• Morse A, Shirouzu N (2007) Nissan’s Ghosn gives up U.S. duties in reshuffle. Wall Street Journal (March 17) http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB117403773086539264.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002) Towards global tax co-operation. Report, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
• Oxley JE (1999) Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(3):283–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R (1993) The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrica 61(5):1109–1146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan RG, Zingales L (1998) Financial dependence and growth. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(3):559–586.Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Rugman AM, Verbeke A (2001) Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management J. 22(3):237–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoar A (2002) Effects of corporate diversification on productivity. J. Finance 57(6):2379–2403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1991) Organizations and markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(2):25–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer J, Gomez C (2011) MNEs and corruption: The impact of national institutions and subsidiary strategy. Strategic Management J. 32(3):280–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sturgeon TJ (2002) Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial organization. Indust. Corporate Change 11(3):451–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svejnar J, Smith SC (1984) The economics of joint ventures in less developed countries. Quart. J. Econom. 99(1):149–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vernon R (1971) Sovereignty at Bay (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Villalonga B (2004) Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. J. Finance 59(2):475–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yiu D, Makino S (2002) The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organ. Sci. 13(6):667–683.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao M (2006) Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Sci. 52:1185–1199.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management J. 32(6):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2013) Designing for complexity: Using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ. Sci. 24(2):339–355.Link, Google Scholar