The Structure of Political Institutions and Effectiveness of Corporate Political Lobbying

References

• Ahuja G, Yayavaram S (2011) Explaining influence rents: The case for an institutions-based view of strategy. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1631–1652.Link, Google Scholar
• Aiken L, West S (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Alvarez M, Cheibub JA, Limongi F, Przeworski A (1996) Classifying political regimes. Stud. Comparative Internat. Development 31(2):3–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvarez M, Cheibub J, Limongi F, Przeworski A (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Material Well Being in the World (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Angelini P, Generale A (2008) On the evolution of firm size distributions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):426–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayyagari M, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Maksimovic V (2008) How well do institutional theories explain firms’ perceptions of property rights? Rev. Financial Stud. 21(4):1833–1871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barboza D (2011) Building boom in China stirs fears of debt overload. New York Times (July 6) http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/07/business/global/building-binge-by-chinas-cities-threatens-countrys-economic-boom.html.Google Scholar
• Bardhan P (2002) Decentralization of governance and development. J. Econom. Perspect. 16(4):185–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardhan P, Mookherjee D (2000) Capture and governance at local and national levels. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):135–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (2007) Corporations, democracy, and the public good. J. Management Inquiry 16(3):201–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (1995) Integrated strategy:Market and nonmarket components. Calif. Management Rev. 37(2):47–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth JR, Lin C, Lin P, Song FM (2009) Corruption in bank lending to firms: Cross-country micro evidence on the beneficial role of competition and information sharing. J. Financial Econom. 91(3):361–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner FR, Leech BL (2001) Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. J. Politics 63(4):1191–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baysinger BD (1984) Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity: An expanded typology. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):248–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker-Ritterspach F, Dörrenbächer C (2009) Intrafirm competition in multinational corporations: Towards a political framework. Competition Change 13(3):199–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benz M, Frey BS (2007) Corporate governance: What can we learn from public governance? Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):92–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry JM, Wilcox C (2009) The Interest Group Society (Pearson/Longman, New York).Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Ridderstråle J (1999) Fighting the corporate immune system: A process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations. Internat. Bus. Rev. 8(2):149–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonardi J, Hillman A, Keim G (2005) The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):397–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonardi J-P, Holburn GLF, Vanden Bergh RG (2006) Nonmarket strategy performance: Evidence from U.S. electric utilities. Acad. Management J. 49(6):1209–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordignon M, Colombo L, Galmarini U (2008) Fiscal federalism and lobbying. J. Public Econom. 92(12):2288–2301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouquet C, Birkinshaw J (2008) Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. J. Management 34(3):477–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campos NF, Giovannoni F (2007) Lobbying, corruption and political influence. Public Choice 131(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cantwell J, Mudambi R (2005) MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management J. 26(12):1109–1128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang SJ, Van Witteloostuijn A, Eden L (2010) From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(2):178–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charron N, Lapuente V, Dykstra L (2010) Bringing the regions back in: A study of sub-national variation in quality of government in 172 EU regions. Paper presented at the APSA 2010 Annual Meeting, American Political Science Association, Washington, DC. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1643232.Google Scholar
• Dahl RA (1998) On Democracy (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo JM, Cameron CM (2009) Endogenous cost lobbying: Theory and evidence. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. http://www.princeton.edu/∼ccameron/CostLobbying.pdf.Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo JM, Silverman BS (2006) Academic earmarks and the returns to lobbying. J. Law Econom. 49(2):597–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desbordes R, Vauday J (2007) The political influence of foreign firms in developing countries. Econom. Politics 19(3):421–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doh J, Lawton T, Rajwani T (2012) Advancing nonmarket strategy research: Institutional perspectives in a changing World. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(3):22–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elazar D (1995) From statism to federalism: A paradigm shift. Publius: J. Federalism 25(2):5–18.Google Scholar
• Fan C, Lin C, Treisman D (2009) Political decentralization and corruption: Evidence from around the world. J. Public Econom. 93(1–2):14–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fielding A, Yang M, Goldstein H (2003) Multilevel ordinal models for examination grades. Statist. Model. 3(2):127–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg P, Maggi G (1999) Protection for sale: An empirical investigation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(5):1135–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grier KB, Munger MC, Roberts BE (1994) The determinants of industry political activity, 1978–1986. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 88(4):911–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grilli L, Rampichini C (2007) Multilevel factor models for ordinal variables. Structural Equation Model. 14(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton LC (2008) Statistics with Stata: Updated for Version 10 (Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• Harstad B, Svensson J (2011) Bribes, lobbying, and development. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 105(1):46–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ (2000) The Institutional environment for multinational investment. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 16(2):334–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Zelner BA (2003) The strategic organization of political risks and opportunities. Strategic Organ. 1(4):451–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill MD, Kelly GW, Lockhart GB, Ness RA (2013) Determinants and effects of corporate lobbying. Financial Management 42(4):931–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ (2003) Determinants of political strategies in U.S. multinationals. Bus. Soc. 42(4):455–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Keim G (1995) International variation in the business-government interface: Institutional and organizational considerations. Acad. Management Rev. 20(1):193–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Wan WP (2005) The determinants of MNE subsidiaries’ political strategies: Evidence of institutional duality. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 36(3):322–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Keim G, Schuler D (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Zardkoohi A, Bierman L (1999) Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management J. 20(1):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsch PM (1975) Organizational effectiveness and the institutional environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 20(3):327–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holburn GLF, Vanden Bergh R (2008) Making friends in hostile environments: Political strategy in regulated Industries. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):521–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holburn GLF, Zelner BA (2010) Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power industry. Strategic Management J. 31(12):1290–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R, Eden L, Lau C, Wright M (2000) Strategy in emerging economies. Acad. Management J. 43(3):249–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Rao H (2004) Store wars: The enactment and repeal of anti-chain-store legislation in america. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):446–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen N, McGillivray F (2005) Federal institutions and multinational investors: Federalism, government credibility, and foreign direct investment. Internat. Interactions 31(4):303–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen NM, Li QA, Rahman A (2010) Understanding corruption and firm responses in cross-national firm-level surveys. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(9):1481–1504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Lincoln WF, Mishra P (2011) The dynamics of firm lobbying. NBER Working Paper 17577, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w17577.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kincaid J, Steytler N (2009) Local Government and Metropolitan Regions in Federal Countries (McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP, Montréal).Google Scholar
• Kingsley A, Vanden Bergh R, Bonardi JP (2012) Political markets and regulatory uncertainty: Insights and implications for integrated strategy. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(3):52–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knack S, Keefer P (1995) Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Econom. Politics 7(3):207–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosack S (2012) The Education of Nations: How the Political Organization of the Poor, Not Democracy, Led Governments to Invest in Mass Education (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozhikode RK, Li J (2012) Political pluralism, public policies, and organizational choices: Banking branch expansion in India, 1948–2003. Acad. Management J. 55(2):339–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB (1999) Institutional strategy. J. Management 25(2):161–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Oh K, Eden L (2010) Why do firms bribe? Insights from residual control theory into firms’ exposure and vulnerability to corruption. Management Internat. Rev. 50(6):775–796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lohmann S (1998) Federalism and central bank independence. World Politics 50(3):401–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo YD, Han BJ (2009) Graft and business in emerging economies: An ecological perspective. J. World Bus. 44(3):225–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Zhao H (2013) Doing business in a transitional society: Economic environment and relational political strategy for multinationals. Bus. Soc. 52(3).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Mayo JW (2012) The world of regulatory influence. J. Regulatory Econom. 41(1):59–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Mayo JW (2014) Influencing public policy making: Firm-, industry- and country-level determinants. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print October 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.2326.Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Mayo JW, Schiffer M (2011) The influence of firms on government. B.E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 11(1):1–25.Google Scholar
• Martin K, Cullen J, Johnson J, Parboteeah K (2007) Deciding to bribe: A cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1401–1422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Qian Y, Xu C (2000) Incentives, information, and organizational form. Rev. Econom. Stud. 67(2):359–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Scott WR, Strang D (1987) Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 32(2):186–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montinola G, Qian Y, Weingast BR (1995) Federalism, Chinese style: The political basis for economic success in China. World Politics 48(1):50–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore M, Hamalai L (1993) Economic liberalization, political pluralism and business associations in developing countries. World Development 21(12):1895–1912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mundlak Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica: J. Econometric Soc. 46(1):69–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasseman W (1996) Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed. (Irwin, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Oates W (1972) Fiscal Federalism (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York).Google Scholar
• Oates WE (1999) An essay on fiscal federalism. J. Econom. Literature 37(3):1120–1149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P, MacKenzie S, Lee J, Podsakoff N (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Przeworski A, Alvarez ME, Cheibub JA, Limongi F (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990 (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Weingast BR (1997) Federalism as a commitment to perserving market incentives. J. Econom. Perspect. 11(4):83–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Roland G, Xu C (1999) Why is China different from Eastern Europe? Perspectives from organization theory. Eur. Econom. Rev. 43(4):1085–1094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Roland G, Xu C (2006) Coordination and experimentation in M-form and U-form organizations. J. Political Econom. 114(2):366–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M, Puranam P (2009) Value appropriation as an organizational capability: The case of IP protection through patents. Strategic Management J. 30(7):765–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riker WH (1964) Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance (Little, Brown, Boston).Google Scholar
• Ring PS, Bigley GA, D’Aunno T, Khanna T (2005) Perspective on how governments matter. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):308–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodden J (2003) Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal federalism and the growth of government. Internat. Organ. 57(4):695–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodden J, Rose-Ackerman S (1997) Does federalism preserve markets? Virginia Law Rev. 1521–1572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodden J, Wibbels E (2002) Beyond the fiction of federalism: Macroeconomic management in multitiered systems. World Politics 54(4): 494–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowan B (1982) Organizational structure and the institutional environment: The case of public schools. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(2):259–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR, Meyer JW (1994) Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Shapiro DL (1995) Federalism: A Dialogue (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
• Spencer J, Gomez C (2011) MNEs and corruption: The impact of national institutions and subsidiary strategy. Strategic Management J. 32(3):280–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer JW, Murtha TP, Lenway SA (2005) How governments matter to new industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):321–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administration (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J. Political Econom. 64(5):416–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1994) The internal organization of government. Oxford Econom. Papers 46(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treier S, Jackman S (2008) Democracy as a latent variable. Amer. J. Political Sci. 52(1):201–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treisman D (2007) The Architecture of Government (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsebelis G (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uhlenbruck K, Rodriguez P, Doh J, Eden L (2006) The impact of corruption on entry strategy: Evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging economies. Organ. Sci. 17(3):402–414.Link, Google Scholar
• Vaaler PA, McNamara G (2004) Crisis and competition in expert organizational decision making: Credit-rating agencies and their response to turbulence in emerging economies. Organ. Sci. 15(6):687–703.Link, Google Scholar
• Watts R (1999) Comparing Federal Systems (McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal).Google Scholar
• Weingast BR (1995) Economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development. J. Law Econom. Organ. 11:1–31.Google Scholar
• Weingast BR (1997) The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 91(2):245–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weymouth S (2012) Firm lobbying and influence in developing countries: A multilevel approach. Bus. Politics 14(4):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu C (2011) The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development. J. Econom. Literature 49(4):1076–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoffie DB, Bergenstein S (1985) Creating political advantage: The rise of the corporate political entrepreneur. Calif. Management Rev. 28(1): 124–139.Crossref, Google Scholar