Perspective—Chance Explanations in the Management Sciences

References

• Aalen OO (1995) Phase type distributions in survival analysis. Scand. J. Statist. 22(4):447–463.Google Scholar
• Aalen OO, Gjessing HK (2001) Understanding the shape of the hazard rate: A process point of view. Statist. Sci. 16(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aalen OO, Gjessing HK (2004) Survival models based on the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Lifetime Data Anal. 10(4):407–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):586–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E, Fairchild G (1999) Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):708–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alchian A (1950) Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. J. Political Econom. 58(3):211–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H (1979) Organizations and Environment (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. 99(394):116–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (1993) On designing economic agents that behave like human agents. J. Evolution. Econom. 3(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artur B, Ermol’ev YM, Kaniovskii YM (1983) A generalized urn problem and its applications. Cybernetics Systems Anal. 19(1):61–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball P (2002) The physical modelling of society: A historical perspective. Physica A: Statist. Mech. Appl. 314(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP (1997) The dynamics of competitive intensity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):128–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP (2008) The Red Queen Among Organizations: How Competitiveness Evolves (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Hansen MT (1996) The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. 17(7):139–157.Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Sci. 32(10):1231–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1997) On flipping coins and making technology decisions: Luck on an explanation of technological foresight and oversight. Garud R, Nayyar PR, Shapira ZB, eds. Technological Innovation Oversights and Foresights (Cambridge University Press, New York), 13–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden JN, Wallsten TS, Fox CR (2007) Contrasting stochastic and support theory accounts of subadditivity. J. Math. Psych. 51(4):229–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger N, Borgs C, Chayes JT, Saberi A (2014) Asymptotic behavior and distributional limits of preferential attachment graphs. Ann. Probab. 42(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bianconi G, Barabási A-L (2001) Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks. Europhysics Lett. 54(4):436–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bottazzi G, Secchi A (2003) A stochastic model of firm growth. Physica A: Statist. Mech. Appl. 324(1–2):213–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bottazzi G, Secchi A (2006) Gibrat’s law and diversification. Indust. Corporate Change 15(5):847–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bottazzi G, Cefis E, Dosi G (2002) Corporate growth and industrial structures: Some evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):705–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bottazzi G, Dosi G, Jacoby N, Secchi A, Tamagni F (2010) Corporate performances and market selection: Some comparative evidence. Indust. Corporate Change 19(6):1953–1996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman EH (1980) A risk-return paradox for strategic management. Sloan Management Rev. 21(1):17–31.Google Scholar
• Busenitz LW, Barney JB (1997) Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. J. Bus. Venturing 12(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) The Demography of Corporations and Industries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers CP, Healy PJ (2012) Updating toward the signal. Econom. Theory 50(3):765–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan LKC, Karceski J, Lakonishok J (2003) The level and persistence of growth rates. J. Finance 58(2):643–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler AD Jr (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chen MK, Risen JL (2010) How choice affects and reflects preferences: Revisiting the free-choice paradigm. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(4):573–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coad A (2007) A closer look at serial growth rate correlation. Rev. Indust. Organ. 31(1):69–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coad A (2009) The Growth of Firms: A Survey of Theories and Empirical Evidence (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coad A, Daunfeldt S-O, Hölzl W, Johansson D, Nightingale P (2014) High-growth firms: Introduction to the special section. Indust. Corporate Change 23(1):91–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG (1974) Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1964) Introduction to Mathematical Sociology (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Cooper AC, Woo CY, Dunkelberg WC (1988) Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. J. Bus. Venturing 3(2):97–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Davidsson P (2006) Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1973) Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. J. Law Econom. 16(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J (2003) Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organ. Sci. 14(3):227–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell J (2004) Random walks and sustained competitive advantage. Management Sci. 50(7):922–934.Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell J (2005) Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psych. Rev. 112(4):951–978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J (2008) Organizational risk taking: Adaptation versus variable risk preferences. Indust. Corporate Change 17(3):427–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Fang C (2010) Predicting the next big thing: Success as a signal of poor judgment. Management Sci. 56(10):1653–1667.Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Kovács B (2008) Selective sampling of empirical settings in organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1):109–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Liu C (2012) Top performers are not the most impressive when extreme performance indicates unreliability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(24):9331–9336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Shapira Z (2009) Performance sampling and bimodal duration dependence. J. Math. Sociol. 33(1):38–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Rond M, Thietart R-A (2007) Choice, chance, and inevitability in strategy. Strategic Management J. 28(5):535–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagle A (2005) Randomness is unpredictability. British J. Philos. Sci. 56(4):749–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Wallsten TS, Budescu DV (1994) Simultaneous over-and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psych. Rev. 101(3):519–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feller W (1957) An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. I (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Feller W (1968) An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Fichman M (1999) Variance explained: Why size does not (always) matter. Sutton RI, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21 (JAI Press, Stamford, CT), 295–331.Google Scholar
• Fiedler K (2000) Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psych. Rev. 107(4):659–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum A (1990) Prospect theory and the risk-return association: An empirical examination in 85 industries. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 14(2):187–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1977) Knowing with certainty: Appropriateness of extreme confidence. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance 3(4):552–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1978) Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance 4(2):330–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Rogers BA, Tversky A (1996) Options traders exhibit subadditive decision weights. J. Risk Uncertainty 13(1):5–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu D, Pammolli F, Buldyrev SV, Riccaboni M, Matia K, Yamasaki K, Stanley HE (2005) The growth of business firms: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(52):18801–18806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X (2009) Power laws in economics and finance. Annual Rev. Econom. 1:255–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardenfors P (1988) Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Geroski PA (2005) Understanding the implications of empirical work on corporate growth rates. Managerial Decision Econom. 26(2):129–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibrat R (1931) Les Inégalités Economiques (Recueil Sirey, Paris).Google Scholar
• Gould SJ (1988) Trends as changes in variance: A new slant on progress and directionality in evolution. J. Paleontol. 62(3):319–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Stiglitz JE (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(3):393–408.Google Scholar
• Growiec J, Pammolli F, Riccaboni M, Stanley HE (2008) On the size distribution of business firms. Econom. Lett. 98(2):207–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamlen WA Jr (1991) Superstardom in popular music: Empirical evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 73(4):729–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hempel C, Oppenheim P (1948) Studies in the logic of explanation. Philos. Sci. 15(2):135–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Raynor ME, Ahmed M (2012) How long must a firm be great to rule out chance? Benchmarking sustained superior performance without being fooled by randomness. Strategic Management J. 33(4):387–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilbert M (2012) Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: How noisy information processing can bias human decision making. Psych. Bull. 138(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM, Karelaia N (2012) Entrepreneurial success and failure: Confidence and fallible judgment. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1733–1747.Link, Google Scholar
• Hopenhayn HA (1992) Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica 60(5):1127–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbell SP (2001) The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B (1982) Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica 50(3):649–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juslin P, Winman A, Olsson H (2000) Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard–easy effect. Psych. Rev. 107(2):384–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesten H (1973) Random difference equations and renewal theory for products of random matrices. Acta Math. 131(1):207–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimura M (1984) The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Klepper S, Thompson P (2006) Submarkets and the evolution of market structure. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):861–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lancaster T (1972) A stochastic model for the duration of a strike. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 135(2):257–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave CA, March JG (1975) An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences (University Press of America, Boston).Google Scholar
• Le Mens G, Hannan MT, Pólos L (2011) Founding conditions, learning, and organizational life chances: Age dependence revisited. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):95–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1991) Random walks and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):397–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy M (2003) Are rich people smarter? J. Econom. Theory 110(1):42–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy M, Levy H (2003) Investment talent and the Pareto wealth distribution: Theoretical and experimental analysis. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(3):709–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn FB, Podolny JM, Tao L (2009) A sociological (de)construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makridakis S, Hibon M (2000) The M3-competition: Results, conclusions and implications. Internat. J. Forecasting 16(4):451–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mancke RB (1974) Causes of interfirm profitability difference: A new interpretation of the evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 88(2):181–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1994) The evolution of evolution. Baum JAC, Singh JV, eds. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 39–49.Google Scholar
• March JG (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JC, March JG (1977) Almost random careers: The Wisconsin school superintendency, 1940–1972. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(3):377–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JC, March JG (1978) Performance sampling in social matches. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23(3):434–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99(1):172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mauboussin MJ (2012) The Success Equation: Untangling Skill and Luck in Business, Sports and Investing (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• McGahan AM, Porter ME (2002) What do we know about variance in accounting profitability? Management Sci. 48(7):834–851.Link, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1990) The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management J. 11(3):171–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Musch J, Grondin S (2001) Unequal competition as an impediment to personal development: A review of the relative age effect in sport. Development. Rev. 21(2):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson F, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Pant PN, Starbuck WH (1990) Innocents in the forest: Forecasting and research methods. J. Management 16(2):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pemantle R (2007) A survey of random processes with reinforcement. Probab. Surveys 4:1–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pólya G (1930) Sur quelques points de la théorie des probabilités. Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré 1(2):117–161.Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategies: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Powell TC (2003) Varieties of competitive parity. Strategic Management J. 24(1):61–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price DS (1976) A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 27(5):292–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raynor ME (2007) The Strategy Paradox: Why Committing to Success Leads to Failure (and What to Do About it) (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Redner S (2001) A Guide to First-Passage Processes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rescher N (1995) Luck: The Brilliant Randomness of Everyday Life (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh).Google Scholar
• Riccaboni M, Pammolli F, Buldyrev SV, Ponta L, Stanley HE (2008) The size variance relationship of business firm growth rates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(50):19595–19600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Romanow AL (1984) A Brownian motion model for decision making. J. Math. Sociol. 10(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross LD (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10 (Academic Press, New York), 173–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruhla C, Ruhia C (1992) The Physics of Chance: From Blaise Pascal to Niels Bohr (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Runde J, de Rond M (2010) Evaluating causal explanations of specific events. Organ. Stud. 31(4):431–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuels ML (1991) Statistical reversion toward the mean: More universal than regression toward the mean. Amer. Statistician 45(4):344–346.Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1965) Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Indust. Management Rev. 6(2):41–49.Google Scholar
• Schmittlein DC (1989) Surprising inferences from unsurprising observations: Do conditional expectations really regress to the mean? Amer. Statistician 43(3):176–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schrödinger E (1915) Zur theorie der fall-und steigversuche an teilchen mit brownscher bewegung. Physikalische Zeitschrift 16:289–295.Google Scholar
• Schwab A, Abrahamson E, Starbuck WH, Fidler F (2011) Researchers should make thoughtful assessments instead of null-hypothesis significance tests. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1105–1120.Link, Google Scholar
• Scott JG (2009) Nonparametric Bayesian multiple testing for longitudinal performance stratification. Ann. Appl. Statist. 3(4):1655–1674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 42(3):425–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA, Bonini CP (1958) The size distribution of business firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 48(4):607–617.Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (1999) Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psych. Rev. 106(3):435–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer B, Spilerman S (1973–1974) Social mobility models for heterogeneous populations. Costner HL, ed. Sociological Methodology, Vol. 5 (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 356–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanley MH, Amaral LA, Buldyrev SV, Havlin S, Leschhorn H, Maass P, Salinger MA, Stanley HE (1996) Scaling behaviour in the growth of companies. Nature 379(6568):804–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck WH (1994) On behalf of naivete. Baum J, Singh J, eds., Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (Oxford University Press, New York), 205–220.Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A (1968) Constructing Social Theories (Chicago University Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Strang D, Macy MW (2001) In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):147–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton J (1997) Gibrat’s legacy. J. Econom. Literature 35(1):40–59.Google Scholar
• Sutton J (2002) The variance of firm growth rates: The “scaling” puzzle. Physica A: Statist. Mech. Appl. 312(3–4):577–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton J (2007) Market share dynamics and the “persistence of leadership” debate. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):222–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taleb N (2007) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Koehler DJ (1994) Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psych. Rev. 101(4):547–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen BC (1980) The Scientific Image (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaupel JW, Manton KG, Stallard E (1979) The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16(3):439–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wainer H, Zwerling HL (2006) Evidence that smaller schools do not improve student achievement. Phi Delta Kappan 88(4):300–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waring GF (1996) Industry differences in the persistence of firm-specific returns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(5):1253–1265.Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Hasker S (2006) Marketing in an unpredictable world. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(9):25–30.Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Peretti J (2007) Viral marketing for the real world. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(May):22–23.Google Scholar
• Williamson O (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar