The Real Oscar Curse: The Negative Consequences of Positive Status Shifts

References

• Amato PR (2010) Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. J. Marriage Family 72:650–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archer J (2004) Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Rev. General Psych. 8:291–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60:92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Bazzini DG, McIntosh WD, Smith SM, Cook S, Harris C (1997) The aging woman in popular film: Underrepresented, unattractive, unfriendly, and unintelligent. Sex Roles 36:531–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berk RA, Newton PJ (1985) Does arrest really deter wife battery? An effort to replicate the findings of the Minneapolis Spouse Abuse Experiment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 50:253–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyersmann J, Gastmeier P, Wolkewitz M, Schumacher M (2008) An easy mathematical proof showed that time-dependent bias inevitably leads to biased effect estimation. J. Clinical Epidemiol. 61:1216–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1956) Social mobility and interpersonal relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 21:290–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1994) Structural Context of Opportunities (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kang J, Stuart TE (2007) Competitive crowding and risk taking in a tournament: Evidence from NASCAR racing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52:208–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kim Y-K, Smith EB (2012) How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organ. Sci. 23:416–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier JM, Jones BS (2004) Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brickman P, Campbell DT (1971) Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. Appley MH, ed. Adaptation-Level Theory (Academic Press, New York), 287–302.Google Scholar
• Brickman P, Coats D, Janoff-Bulman R (1978) Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36:917–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannella AA Jr, Shen W (2001) So close and yet so far: Promotion versus exit for CEO heirs apparent. Acad. Management J. 44:252–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Dahl GB (2011) Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 126:103–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua RY-J, Iyengar SS (2006) Empowerment through choice? A critical analysis of the effects of choice in organizations. Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27 (JAI Press, Oxford, UK), 41–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleves MA, Gould WW, Gutierrez RG, Marchenko Y (2008) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Conger RD, Lorenz FO, Elder GH Jr, Simons RL, Ge X (1993) Husband and wife differences in response to undesirable life events. J. Health Soc. Behav. 34:71–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 34:187–220.Google Scholar
• Crosby F (1976) A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psych. Rev. 83:85–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Tutorial in biostatistics: Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statist. Medicine 17:2265–2281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davies JC (1962) Toward a theory of revolution. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27:5–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JA (1959) A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry 22:280–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeMaris A (2013) Burning the candle at both ends: Extramarital sex as a precursor of marital disruption. J. Family Issues 34: 1474–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diehm J (2014) How women win best actress Oscars, all in one chart. Huffington Post (January 25) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/16/best-actress-winners_n_4596033.html.Google Scholar
• Diener E, Lucas RE, Scollon CN (2006) Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. Amer. Psychologist 61:305–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson-Evans C (2006) Winning an Oscar: Blessing or curse? FoxNews.com (March 3) http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/03/03/winning-oscar-blessing-or-curse/.Google Scholar
• Durkheim É (1997) Suicide: A Study in Sociology, Simpson G, ed. (Free Press, New York). [Translated by Spaulding JA, Simpson G; Orig. pub. 1897 as Lé Suicide (Les Presses Universitaires de France, Paris).]Google Scholar
• Elsesser K (2010) And the gender-neutral Oscar goes to…. New York Times (March 4) A35.Google Scholar
• English JF (2005) The Economy of Prestige: Prizes, Awards, and the Circulation of Cultural Value (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flanagin J (2013) Because we need more Kathryn Bigelows: Segregate the Oscars by gender! Salon.com (January 10) http://www.salon.com/2014/01/10/and_the_academy_award_for_best_female_director_goes_to_partner/.Google Scholar
• Frank RH, Cook PJ (1995) The Winner-Take-All Society (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Gilberg M, Hines T (2000) Male entertainment award winners are older than female winners. Psych. Rep. 86:175–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107:1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Borjas GJ (1980) Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Definitions, questions and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence. Economica 47:247–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET, Klein R, Strauman T (1985) Self-concept discrepancy theory: A psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of depression and anxiety. Soc. Cognition 3:51–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollinger K (2006) The Actress: Hollywood Acting and the Female Star (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (2000) When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79:995–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2003) The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks’ entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48:466–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2006) Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51:97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2008) The use of relational discrimination to manage market entry: When do status and structural holes work against you? Acad. Management J. 51:723–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Roy A (2008) Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Management J. 51:495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim BK, Kim H (2011) The importance of status in markets: A market identity perspective. Pearce JL, ed. Status, Organization and Management (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 87–117.Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim H, Kim BK (2012) Meeting expectations: A role-theoretic perspective on reputation. Barnett ML, Pollock TG, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 140–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson DR, Wu J (2002) An empirical test of crisis, social selection, and role explanations of the relationship between marital disruption and psychological distress: A pooled time-series analysis of four-wave panel data. J. Marriage Family 64:211–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1995) Varieties of counterfactual thinking. Roese NJ, Olson JM, eds. What Might have been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 375–396.Google Scholar
• Kessler RC, McRae JAJ Jr (1982) The effect of wives’ employment on the mental health of married men and women. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 47:216–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kets de Vries MFR (2005) The dangers of feeling like a fake. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(9):108–116.Google Scholar
• Klose M, Jacobi F (2004) Can gender differences in the prevalence of mental disorders be explained by sociodemographic factors? Arch. Women’s Mental Health 7:133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59:1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2004) The Peter Principle: A theory of decline. J. Political Econom. 112:S141–S163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89:841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy E (1989) The democratic elite: America’s movie stars. Qualitative Sociol. 12:29–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy E (2001) Oscar Fever: The History and Politics of the Academy Awards (The Continuum International Publishing Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Lincoln AE, Allen MP (2004) Double jeopardy in Hollywood: Age and gender in the careers of film actors, 1926–1999. Sociol. Forum 19:611–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linton R (1936) The Study of Man (D. Appleton-Century Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Long JS (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D (2002) Curse of the Oscars: Anguish as leading ladies win film awards, but lose lovers. Mirror (July 19) http://www.thefreelibrary.com/CURSE+of+the+Oscars%3B+ANGUISH+AS+LEADING+LADIES+WIN+FILM+AWARDS..BUT…-a089260929.Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Tate G (2009) Superstar CEOs. Quart. J. Econom. 124:1593–1638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malter D (2014) On the causality and cause of returns to organizational status: Evidence from the grands crus classés of the Médoc. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59:271–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall CM, Chadwick BA, Marshall BC (1992) The influence of employment on family interaction, well-being, and happiness. Bahr SJ, ed. Family Research: A Sixty-Year Review, 1930–1990 (Lexington Books, New York), 167–229.Google Scholar
• Matud MP (2004) Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality Individual Differences 37:1401–1415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medvec VH, Madey SF, Gilovich T (1995) When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic athletes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69:603–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menaghan EG (1989) Role changes and psychological well-being: Variation in effects by gender and role repertoire. Soc. Forces 67:693–714.Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1957) The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. British J. Sociol. 8:106–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159:56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munsch CL (2012) The science of two-timing: The state of infidelity research. Sociol. Compass 6:46–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy M, Glaser K, Grundy E (1997) Marital status and long-term illness in Great Britain. J. Marriage Family 59:156–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson JM, Roese NJ (2002) Relative deprivation and counterfactual thinking. Walker I, Smith HJ, eds. Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 265–287.Google Scholar
• O’Neil T (2010) Sandra Bullock and Kate Winslet: Victims of Oscar curse? Gold Derby (blog), March 17, http://goldderby.latimes.com/awards_goldderby/2010/03/sandra-bullock-kate-winslet-divorce-591847263-oscars-news-story.html.Google Scholar
• Petersen JL, Hyde JS (2010) A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psych. Bull. 136: 21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98:829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39:458–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Phillips DJ (1996) The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change 5:453–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Redelmeier DA, Singh SM (2001) Survival in Academy Award-winning actors and actresses. Ann. Internal Medicine 134: 955–962.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roese NJ (1994) The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66:805–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roese NJ (1997) Counterfactual thinking. Psych. Bull. 121:133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roese NJ, Pennington GL, Coleman J, Janicki M, Li NP, Kenrick DT (2006) Sex differences in regret: All for love or some for lust? Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 32:770–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1981) The economics of superstars. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71:845–858.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum JE (1979) Tournament mobility: Career patterns in a corporation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24:220–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossman G, Esparza N, Bonacich P (2010) I’d like to thank the Academy, team spillovers, and network centrality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75:31–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Runciman WC (1966) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Scheibehenne B, Greifeneder R, Todd PM (2010) Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. J. Consumer Res. 37:409–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz B (2004) The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Sharkey AJ (2014) Categories and organizational status: The role of industry status in the response to organizational deviance. Amer. J. Sociol. 119:1380–1433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen AB (1996) The structural basis of social inequality. Amer. J. Sociol. 101:1333–1365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorokin PA (1959) Social Mobility (Free Press, Glencoe, IL). [Orig. pub. 1927 (Harper & Row, New York).]Google Scholar
• South SJ, Trent K, Shen Y (2001) Changing partners: Toward a macrostructural-opportunity theory of marital dissolution. J. Marriage Family 63:743–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stack S, Eshleman JR (1998) Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. J. Marriage Family 60:527–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51:273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sylvestre MP, Huszti E, Hanley JA (2006) Do Oscar winners live longer than less successful peers? A reanalysis of the evidence. Ann. Internal Medicine 145:361–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson K, Bordwell D (2003) Film History: An Introduction (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Treas J, Giesen D (2000) Sexual infidelity among married and cohabitating Americans. J. Marriage Family 62:48–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim T-Y, Ukanwa K, von Rittmann J (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108:1018–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar