Organizational Failure and Intraprofessional Status Loss

References

• Allison PD, Long J, Krauze T (1982) Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 47:615–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baty GB, Evan WM, Rothermel TW (1971) Personnel flows as interorganizational relations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 16:430–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Phillips DJ (2005) Interorganizational determinants of promotion: Client leadership and the promotion of women attorneys. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70:678–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Webster M Jr (2006) Expectations, status, and behavior. Burke PJ, ed. Contemporary Social Psychological Theories (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 268–300.Google Scholar
• Berger J, Fisek MH, Norman RZ, Zelditch M Jr (1977) Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach (Elsevier, New York).Google Scholar
• Berger J, Rosenholtz SJ, Zelditch M (1980) Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6:479–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Fisek MH, Ridgeway C, Fisek MH, Norman RZ (1998) The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63:379–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Briscoe F, Fernandez-Mateo I, Sterling A (2013) The employment relationship and inequality. Acad. Management Ann. 7:61–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby DD, Bielby W (1996) Women and men in film: Gender inequality among writers in a culture industry. Gender Soc. 10:248–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM, Duncan OD (1967) The American Occupational Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1992) Power and managerial dismissal: Scapegoating at the top. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37:400–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Haynes R, Lee W, Smith EB (2010) When do Matthew effects occur? J. Math. Sociol. 34:80–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brobeck Info (2009) Brobeck Info.com. Last accessed May 15, 2009, http://www.brobeckinfo.com/. [Site discontinued.]Google Scholar
• Broughton W, Mills EW (1980) Resource inequality and accumulative advantage: Stratification in the ministry. Soc. Forces 58:1289–1301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Beckman CM (2002) Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Res. Sociol. Organ. 19:229–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA (1991) Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36:459–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole JR, Cole S (1973) Social Stratification in Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole JR, Singer B (1991) A theory of limited differences: Explaining the productivity puzzle in science. Zuckerman H, Cole JR, Breuer JT, eds. The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community (W. W. Norton & Company, New York), 277–310.Google Scholar
• Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• D’Aveni R (1990) Top managerial prestige and organizational bankruptcy. Organ. Sci. 1:121–142.Link, Google Scholar
• DiPrete TA, Eirich GM (2006) Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32:271–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113:1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I (2009) Cumulative gender disadvantage in contract employment. Amer. J. Sociol. 114:871–923.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galanter M, Palay T (1991) Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Katz LF (1991) Layoffs and lemons. J. Labor Econom. 9:351–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glater JD (2003) A happy firm’s ending is anything but. New York Times (June 22) http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/22/business/a-happy-firm-s-ending-is-anything-but.html.Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1952) On cooling the mark out. Some aspects of adaptation to failure. Psychiatry 15:451–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Gorman EH (2006) Work uncertainty and the promotion of professional women: The case of law firm partnership. Soc. Forces 85:865–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould R (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107:1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA, Cohen LE (1994) The ecological dynamics of careers: The impact of organizational founding, dissolution, and merger on job mobility. Amer. J. Sociol. 100:104–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinz JP (2009) When law firms fail. Suffolk Univ. Law Rev. 43: 67–78.Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Bierman L, Shimizu K, Kochhar R (2001) Director and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Management J. 44:13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B, Kaplan S (2003) The state of U.S. corporate governance: What’s right and what’s wrong? J. Appl. Corporate Finance 15:8–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphreys P, Berger J (1981) Theoretical consequences of the status characteristics formulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 86:953–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2006) Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51:97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsson S, Greve HR, Fujiwara-Greve T (2009) Lost without deserving: Legitimacy loss in response to reported corporate deviance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54:195–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn L (2010) The long-term labor market consequences of graduating from college in a bad economy. Labour Econom. 17:303–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159:56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1988) The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis 79:606–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore JC Jr (1968) Status and influence in small group interactions. Sociometry 31:47–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore D, Tetlock P, Tanlu L, Bazerman M (2006) Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Acad. Management Rev. 31:10–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan SL, Todd J (2008) A diagnostic routine for the detection of consequential heterogeneity of causal effects. Sociol. Methodol. 38:231–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moshan B (2002) Vault Guide to the Top 100 Law Firms, 4th ed. (Vault, New York).Google Scholar
• Moshan B (2003) Vault Guide to the Top 100 Law Firms, 5th ed. (Vault, New York).Google Scholar
• O’Reilly C III, Chatman JA (1986) Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance identification, and internalization of prosocial behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 71:492–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (2006) Initial labor market conditions and long-term outcomes for economists. J. Econom. Perspect. 20:143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (2008) The making of an investment banker: Stock market shocks, career choice, and lifetime income. J. Finance 63: 2601–2628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ (2001) The promotion paradox: The relationship between organizational mortality and employee promotion chances in Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Amer. J. Sociol. 106: 1058–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ (2002) A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47:474–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Sørensen JB (2003) Competitive position and promotion rates: Commercial television station top management, 1953–1988. Soc. Forces 813:819–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107:379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Negro G, Rao H (2010) Stained red: A study of stigma by association with blacklisted artists during the “Red Scare” in Hollywood, 1945–1960. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75:456–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rider CI, Tan D (2015) Labor market advantages of organizational status: A study of lateral partner hiring by large U.S. law firms. Organ. Sci. 26(2):356–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70:367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Backor K, Li YE, Tinkler JE, Erickson KG (2009) How easily does a social difference become a status distinction: Gender matters. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74:44–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera L (2011) Ivies, extracurriculars and exclusion: Elite employers’ use of educational credentials. Res. Soc. Strategic Mobility 29:71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts PW, Khaire M (2009) Getting known by the company you keep: Publicizing the qualifications and associations of skilled employees. Indust. Corporate Change 18:77–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandburg B (2003) Brobeck falls. Recorder (January 31). [Archived at http://www.infirmation.com/bboard/clubs-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002499.] Google Scholar
• Sandefur RL (2001) Work and honor in the law: Prestige and the division of lawyers’ labor. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66:382–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M (2008) Interlopers and field change: The entry of U.S. news into the field of legal education. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53:209–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Espeland WN (2009) The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74:63–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauer SJ, Thomas-Hunt MC, Morris PA (2010) Too good to be true? The unintended signaling effects of educational prestige on external expectations of team performance. Organ. Sci. 21:1108–1120.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmitt K (2005) Ex-Brobeck partners hope second time’s the charm. Recorder (October 6) http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1128503112280#. Retrieved from LexisNexis.Google Scholar
• Semadeni M, Cannella AA Jr, Fraser DR, Lee DS (2008) Fight or flight: Managing stigma in executive careers. Strategic Management J. 29:557–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson B, Walker HA (2002) Status characteristics and performance expectations: A reformulation. Sociol. Theory 20:24–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sluss DM, Ashforth BE (2008) How relational and organizational identification converge: Processes and conditions. Organ. Sci. 19:807–823.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith DR, Abbott A (1983) A labor market perspective on the mobility of college football coaches. Soc. Forces 61:1147–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB (1999) Executive migration and interorganizational competition. Soc. Sci. Res. 28:289–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB (2007) Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52:387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence AM (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87: 355–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Callahan AL (1987) The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Acad. Management J. 30:405–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. News and World Report (2003) America’s best graduate schools. Report, U.S. News and World Report, New York.Google Scholar
• Young E (2003) Valley’s big law firms find they’re less attractive. San Francisco Business Times (November 9) http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2003/11/10/story8.html.Google Scholar
• Young E (2005) Brobeck trustee fits 200 lawyers into suits. San Francisco Business Times (January 30) http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2005/01/31/story4.html?page=all.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman H (1998) Accumulation of advantage and disadvantage: The theory and its intellectual biography. Mongardini C, Tabbini S, eds. Robert K. Merton and Comtemporary Sociology (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ), 139–161.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim T-Y, Ukanwa K, Rittmann JV (2003) Robust identities or non-entities? Typecasting in the feature film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108:1018–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar