Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0959

References

  • Adeola F (1994) Environmental hazards, health, and the racial inequity in hazardous waste distribution. Environment Behav. 26:99–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen BL (2003) Uneasy Alchemy: Citizens and Experts in Louisiana’s Chemical Corridor Dispute (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Almandoz J (2014) Founding teams as carriers of competing logics: When institutional forces predict banks’ risk exposure. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59:442–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson TL (2000) Political Environmentalism: Going Behind the Green Curtain (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Anderson TW, Hsiao C (1981) Estimation of dynamic models with error components. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 76:598–606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari S, Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2010) Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Acad. Management Rev. 35:67–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnold CA, Norton C (2010) A voice is a terrible thing to waste. Planning 76:38–42.Google Scholar
  • Bansal P, Hoffman AJ, eds. (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Organization building amid multiple institutional logics: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53:1419–1440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellas AS (1998) Empirical evidence of advances in scrubber technology. Resource Energy Econom. 20:327–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowen WM, Salling MJ, Haynes KE, Cyran EJ (1995) Toward environmental justice: Spatial equity in Ohio and Cleveland. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 85:641–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boxall B (2006) Bush’s grade on environment falls. Los Angeles Times (August 4), http://articles.latimes.com/2006/aug/04/nation/na-enviropoll4.Google Scholar
  • Bravin J (2012) Fight against EPA orders heads to Supreme Court. Wall Street Journal (January 9), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203436904577149001510886324.html.Google Scholar
  • Brint S (2001) Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociol. Theory 19:1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bryant BI, Mohai P (1992) Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
  • Bullard R (1983) Solid waste sites and the black Houston community. Sociol. Inquiry 53:273–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bullard R (1994) Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color (Sierra Club Books, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Campbell JL, Pedersen OK (2001) The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis (Princeton Unviersity Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cavazos DE, Rutherford MA (2012) Bringing regulatory agencies into organizational studies: Broadening the lens used to examine the state. J. Management Inquiry 21:4–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakraborty J (2004) The geographic distribution of potential risks posed by industrial toxic emissions in the U.S. J. Environment. Sci. Health 39:559–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christmann P (2004) Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Acad. Management J. 47:747–760.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen S, Kamieniecki S, Cahn MA (2006) Strategic Planning in Environmental Regulation: A Policy Approach That Works (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Cordano M, Frieze IH (2000) Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: Applying Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Acad. Management J. 43:627–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crowder K, Downey L (2010) Interneighborhood migration, race, and environmental hazards: Modeling microlevel processes of environmental inequality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115:1110–1149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF (2009) Managed by the Markets: How Finance Has Re-shaped America (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Davis GF, Greve HR (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103:1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald MN, eds. (2005) Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Morrill C, Rao H, Soule SA (2008) Introduction: Social movements in organizations and markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53:389–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Bakker F, den Hond F, King BG, Weber K (2013) Social movements, civil society and corporations. Organ. Stud. 34:573–593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse DL (2000) Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. J. Management 26:1091–1112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse DL (2004) Comment on “Toward a theory of social risk.” Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 34:108–112.Google Scholar
  • Deephouse DL, Suchman M (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin-Andersson K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, Oxford, UK), 49–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dowdle A, Limbocker S, Yang S, Sebold K, Stewart PA (2013) The Invisible Hands of Political Parties in Presidential Elections: Party Activists and Political Aggregation from 2004 to 2012 (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Downey L (1998) Environmental injustice: Is race or income a better predictor? Soc. Sci. Quart. 79:766–778.Google Scholar
  • Drake BA (2010) The skeptical environmentalist: Senator Barry Goldwater and the environmental management state. Environment. History 15:587–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman LB (1992) Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. Amer. J. Sociol. 97:1531–1576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psych. Sci. 24:56–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2004) The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49:501–534.Google Scholar
  • Fiss PC, Cambré B, Marx A, eds. (2013) Configurational Theory and Methods in Urganizational Research, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 38 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Florida R (1996) Lean and green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. Calif. Management Rev. 39:80–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fourcade M, Healy K (2007) Moral views of market society. Annual Rev. Sociol. 33:285–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedland R (2013) God, love, and other good reasons for practice: Thinking through institutional logics. Res. Sociol. Organ. 39:25–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–266.Google Scholar
  • Galaskiewicz J (1985) Social Organization of an Urban Grants Economy: A Study of Business Philanthropy and Nonprofit Organizations (Academic Press, Orlando, FL).Google Scholar
  • Galaskiewicz J (1997) An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:445–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6:1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbs L (2002) Citizen activism for environmental health: The growth of a powerful new grassroots health movement. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 584:97–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gottlieb R (1993) Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement (Island Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Grant DS II, Bergesen AJ, Jones AW (2002) Organizational size and pollution: The case of the U.S. chemical industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 67:389–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray WB, Shadbegian RJ (1998) Environmental regulation, investment timing and technology choice. J. Indust. Econom. 46:235–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray WB, Shadbegian RJ (2005) When and why do plants comply? Paper mills in the 1980s. Law Policy 27:238–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Hinings CR (1996) Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad. Management Rev. 21:1022–1054.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Díaz AM, Li SX, Lorente JC (2010) The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ. Sci. 21:521–539.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta E, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5:317–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR, Palmer D, Pozner J-E (2010) Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes and consequences of organizational misconduct. Acad. Management Ann. 4:53–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton JT (1995) Testing for environmental racism: Prejudice, profits, political power. J. Policy Anal. Management 14:107–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison K, Antweiler W (2003) Incentives for pollution abatement: Regulation, regulatory threats, and non-governmental pressures. J. Policy Anal. Management 22(3):361–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman HA, Rao H (1997) Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 102(6):1606–1651.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hilary G, Hui KW (2009) Does religion matter in corporate decision making in America? J. Financial Econom. 93(3):455–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman AJ (2001) From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism, Expanded ed. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Horowitz IL (1970) “Separate but equal”: Revolution and counter-revolution in the American city. Soc. Problems 17:294–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jennings PD, Zandbergen PA (1995) Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Acad. Management Rev. 20:1015–1052.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kagan RA, Thornton D, Gunningham N (2003) Explaining corporate environmental performance: How does regulation matter? Law Soc. Rev. 37:51–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keele L (2006) Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Anal. 14:186–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy MT, Fiss PC (2009) Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U.S. hospitals. Acad. Management J. 52:897–918.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr S, Newell RG (2003) Policy induced technology adoption: Evidence from the U.S. lead phasedown. J. Indust. Econom. 51:317–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna M, Quimio WRH, Bojilova D (1998) Toxics release information: A policy tool for environmental protection. J. Environment. Econom. Management 36(3):243–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimberly JR, Evanisko MJ (1981) Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad. Management J. 24:689–713.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King BG (2011) The tactical disruptiveness of movements: Sources of market and mediated disruption in corporate boycotts. Soc. Problems 48:491–517.Google Scholar
  • King BG, Pearce N (2010) The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:249–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King BG, Soule SA (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52:413–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konisky DM (2009) Inequities in enforcement? Environmental justice and government performance. J. Policy Anal. Management 28:102–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraatz MS, Block ES (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin-Andersson K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 243–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraatz MS, Zajac EJ (1996) Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61:812–836.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krippner GR (2012) Capitalizing on Crisis: The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee AI, Alm J (2004) The Clean Air Act amendments and firm investment in pollution abatement equipment. Land Econom. 80:433–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee M-DP (2009) Does ownership form matter for corporate social responsibility? A longitudinal comparison of environmental performance between public, private and joint-venture firms. Bus. Soc. Rev. 114:435–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lok J (2010) Institutional logics as identity projects. Acad. Management J. 53:1305–1335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M (2001) Insitutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:29–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50:289–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Boxenbaum E (2013) Institutional Logics in Action (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Hirsch P (2010) Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the U.S. Financial Crisis (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Fairclough S, Lee M-DP (2012) Institutional approaches to organizations and the natural environment. Bansal P, Hoffman AJ, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment, Chap. 12 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ, Hirsch P (2003) Social movements, field frames, and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Econom. Rev. 1:71–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magat WA, Viscusi WK (1990) Effectiveness of the EPA’s regulatory enforcement: The case of industrial effluent standards. J. Law Econom. 33:331–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcus AA, Aragón-Correa JA, Pinske J (2011) Firms, regulatory uncertainty, and the natural environment. Calif. Management Rev. 54:5–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Battilana J (2009) Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:283–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Lounsbury M (2007) Vive la resistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Acad. Management J. 50:799–820.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32:925–945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R, eds. (2011) Communities and Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maxwell JW, Lyon TP, Hackett SC (2000) Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. J. Law Econom. 43:583–618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson CM, Sauder M (2013) Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58:165–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphree DW, Wright SA, Ebaugh HR (1996) Toxic waste siting and community resistance: How cooptation of local citizen opposition failed. Sociol. Perspect. 39:447–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson G (2011) Ariz. pulls support for EPA’s greenhouse gas endangerment finding. New York Times (January 28), http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/01/28/28greenwire-ariz-pulls-support-for-epas-greenhouse-gas-end-23584.html.Google Scholar
  • Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16:145–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orts EW (1995) A reflexive model of environmental regulation. Bus. Ethics Quart. 5:779–794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pache AC, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad. Mangement Rev. 35:455–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pache AC, Santos F (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 56:972–1001.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D (2012) Normal Organizational Wrongdoing: A Critical Analysis of Theories of Misconduct in and by Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng Y-S, Lin S-S (2008) Local responsiveness pressure, subsidiary resources, green management adoption and subsidiary’s performance: Evidence from Taiwanese manufactures. J. Bus. Ethics 79:199–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollock TG, Rindova V (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46:631–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Popp D (2003) Pollution control innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990. J. Policy Anal. Management 22(4):641–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prechel H (2012) Corporate power and US economic and environmental policy, 1978–2008. Cambridge J. Regions, Econom. Soc. 5:357–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prechel H, Touche G (2014) The effects of organizational characteristics and state environmental policies on sulfur-dioxide pollution in U.S. electrical energy corporations. Soc. Sci. Quart. 95:76–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Purdy JM, Gray B (2009) Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Acad. Management J. 52:355–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using STATA (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
  • Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108:795–843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Reay T, Hinings CR (2005) The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organ. Stud. 26:349–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rucht D (1999) The impact of environmental movements in western societies. Giugni M, McAdam D, Tilly C, eds. How Social Movements Matter (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), 204–224.Google Scholar
  • Ruckelshaus WD (1993) William D. Ruckelshaus: Oral history interview. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Accessed January 15, 2015, http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/william-d-ruckelshaus-oral-history-interview.Google Scholar
  • Schneiberg M, Bartley T (2001) Regulating American industries: Markets, politics, and the institutional determinants of fire insurance regulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 107:101–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneiberg M, Bartley T (2008) Organizations, regulation, and economic behavior: Regulatory dynamics and forms from the Nineteenth to Twenty-First century. Annual Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 4:31–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneiberg M, Lounsbury M (2008) Social movements and neo-institutional theory: Analyzing path creation and change. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin-Andersson K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Institutional Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 650–672.Google Scholar
  • Schneiberg M, Soule SA (2005) Institutionalization as a contested, multilevel process: The case of rate regulation in American fire insurance. Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald MN, eds. Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 122–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneiberg M, King M, Smith T (2008) Social movements and organizational form: Cooperative alternatives to corporations in the American insurance, dairy, and grain industries. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73:635–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott WR, Ruef M, Mendel PJ, Caronna CA (2000) Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Sherman JV (1969) Waste motion: Industry is making progress in combating water pollution. Barron’s Natl. Bus. Financial Weekly 49:11–14.Google Scholar
  • Short JL, Toffel MW (2010) Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55:361–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54:123–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder L, Noland M, Stavins R (2003) The effects of environmental regulation on technology diffusion: The case of chlorine manufacturing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93:431–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soobader M-J, LeClere FB (1999) Aggregation and the measurement of income inequality, effects on morbidity. Soc. Sci. Medicine 48:733–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soule SA (2012) Social movements and markets, industries, and firms. Organ. Stud. 33:1715–1733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sprenger R-U (1997) Environmental Policies and Employment (OECD, Paris).Google Scholar
  • Stewart RB (1985) Economics, environment, and the limits of legal control. Harvard Environment. Law Rev. 9:4–6.Google Scholar
  • Stillman RJ II (1990) The peculiar “stateless” origins of American public administration and the consequences for government today. Public Admin. Rev. 50:156–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stretesky P, Hogan MJ (1998) Environmental justice: An analysis of Superfund sites in Florida. Soc. Problems 45:268–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunstein CR (1990) Paradoxes of the regulatory state. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 57:407–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szasz A (1994) EcoPopulism: Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
  • Tenbrunsel AE, Wade-Benzoni KA, Messick DM, Bazerman MH (2000) Understanding the influence of environmental standards on judgments and choices. Acad. Management J. 43:854–866.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornton PH, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 105:801–843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: Foundations, Research, and Theoretical Elaboration (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011) RCRA Orientation Manual 2011: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Vigdor JL (2004) Community composition and collective action: Analyzing initial mail response to the 2000 census. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86:303–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Voronov M, Vince R (2012) Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Acad. Management Rev. 37:58–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward K Jr (2009) Toxic emissions drop in West Virginia, U.S. West Virginia Gazette (June 12), http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200903190757.Google Scholar
  • Zald MN (1978) On the social control of industries. Soc. Forces 57:79–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zald MN, Lounsbury M (2010) The wizards of OZ: Towards an institutional approach to elites, expertise and command posts. Organ. Stud. 31:963–996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.