Technology Shocks, Technological Collaboration, and Innovation Outcomes

References

• Agarwal R, Bayus BL (2002) The market evolution and sales takeoff of product innovations. Management Sci. 48:1024–1041.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22:521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexopoulos M (2011) Read all about it!! What happens following a technology shock? Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:1144–1179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand BN, Khanna T (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. 21:295–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand J, Oriani R, Vassolo RS (2010) Alliance activity as a dynamic capability in the face of a discontinuous technological change. Organ. Sci. 21:1213–1232.Link, Google Scholar
• Arnold H (2003) Technology Shocks: Origins, Managerial Responses, and Firm Performance (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basberg BL (1987) Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature. Res. Policy 16:131–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu S, Fernald J, Kimball M (2004) Are technology improvements contractionary? NBER Working Paper 10592, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Shipilov A, Rowley TJ (2003) Where do small worlds come from? Indust. Corporate Change 12:697–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (Analytic Technologies, Lexington, KY).Google Scholar
• Christiano LJ, Eichenbaum M (2003) What happens after a technology shock? NBER Working Paper 9819, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark TS, Linzer DA (2015) Should I use fixed or random effects? Political Sci. Res. Methods. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corrado R, Zollo M (2006) Small worlds evolving: Governance reforms, privatizations, and ownership networks in Italy. Indust. Corporate Change 15:319–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeds DL, Hill CWL (1996) Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial firms. J. Bus. Venturing 11:41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res. Policy 11(3):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrnberg E (1995) On the definition and measurement of technological discontinuities. Technovation 15:437–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1996) Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 7:136–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Erdős P, Rényi A (1959) On the Random Graphs 1, Vol. 6 (Institute of Mathematics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest).Google Scholar
• Gali J (1999) Technology, employment, and the business cycle: Do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations? Amer. Econom. Rev. 89:249–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilsing V, Nooteboom B, Vanhaverbeke W, Duysters G, van den Oord A (2008) Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Res. Policy 37:1717–1731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goerzen A (2007) Alliances, networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships. Strategic Management J. 28:487–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golder PN, Shacham R, Mitra D (2009) Innovations’ origins: When, by whom, and how are radical innovations developed? Marketing Sci. 28:166–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Gomes-Casseres B, Hagedoorn J, Jaffe AB (2006) Do alliances promote knowledge flows? J. Financial Econom. 80:5–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin J (1993) Email 101 (Project Gutenberg, New York).Google Scholar
• Grant R, Baden-Fuller C (2004) A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. J. Management Stud. 41:61–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin A (2002) Product development cycle time for business-to-business products. Indust. Marketing Management 31:291–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 28:1661–1707.Google Scholar
• Griliches Z, Pakes A, Hall BH (1988) The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity. NBER Working Paper 2083, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40:619–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. 19:293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104:1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Higgins MC (2003) Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management J. 24:127–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen GD, Prescott EC (1993) Did technology shocks cause the 1990–1991 recession? Amer. Econom. Rev. 83:280–286.Google Scholar
• Hargadon A (2003) How Breakthroughs Happen: Technology Brokering and the Pursuit of Innovation (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hoffman W (2007) Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management J. 28:827–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Fogarty MS (2000) Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90:215–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jorgenson D (2001) Information technology and the U.S. economy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91:1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B, Rousseau PL (2005) General purpose technologies. Aghion P, Durlauf SN, eds. Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1B (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1182–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA (1993) Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kogut B (1991) Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Sci. 37:19–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Kortum S, Lerner J (1998) Stronger protection or technological revolution: What is behind the recent surge in patenting? Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy 48: 247–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 18:783–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1998) The slow pace of rapid technological change: Gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Indust. Corporate Change 7:217–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Rose GM (2003) The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: The case of Internet computing in systems development organizations. MIS Quart. 27:557–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhavan R, Koka BR, Prescott JE (1998) Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management J. 19:439–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W, Singh K (1992) Incumbents’ use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 18:347–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeen M, Agarwal R (2014) Incubation of an industry and heterogeneous modes of value capture: Evidence from agricultural biotechnology. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Simcoe T (2002) Is the Internet a US invention? An economic and technological history of computer networking. Res. Policy 31:1369–1387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 17:77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15:5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Pescosolido BA (1992) Beyond rational choice: The social dynamics of how people seek help. Amer. J. Sociol. 97:1096–1138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Powell WW, White D, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110: 1132–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts L (2000) Internet growth trends. Accessed September 1, 2013, http://www.packet.cc/files/InternetTrends.htm.Google Scholar
• Robinson DT, Stuart TE (2007) Network effects in the governance of strategic alliances. J. Law Econom., Organ. 23:242–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49:751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Padula G (2008) Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organ. Sci. 19:669–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Metiu A, George VP (2001) From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:748–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT (2001) Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. 22:687–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2002) Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: Testing a model of technological lock out. Acad. Management J. 45:387–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2009) Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management J. 30:233–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53:1113–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Steensma K (2001) The use of modular organizational forms: An industry level analysis. Acad. Management J. 44:1149–1169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soh P-H (2003) The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implication for new product performance. J. Bus. Venturing (18):727–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava S (2012) Social capital activation, uncertainty, and organizational restructuring. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21:791–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sussman V, Pollack K (1995) Gold rush in cyberspace. U.S. News World Rep. (November 13) 72–79.Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1987) Patents, citations, and innovations: Tracing the links. NBER Working Paper 2457, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31:439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Strogatz S (1998) Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393:440–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer-Verlag, New York), 185–208.Crossref, Google Scholar