The Categorical Imperative and Structural Reproduction: Dynamics of Technological Entry in the Semiconductor Industry

References

• Alcacer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Allison PD, Waterman PD (2002) Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociol. Methodology 32(1):247–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P (1996) Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):155–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter O, Card D (1985) Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effects of training programs. Rev. Econom. Statist. 67(3):648–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowers A (2015) Relative comparison and category membership: The case of equity analysts. Organ. Sci. 26(2):571–583.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowker G, Star S (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiger RL (2002) Poststructuralism in organizational studies. Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ, eds. Social Structure and Organizations Revisited, Research in the Sociology of Organizations 19 (Emerald Group, Bingley, UK), 295–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiger RL, Mohr JW (2004) Institutional logics from the aggregation of organizational networks: Operational procedures for the analysis of counted data. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 10(1):17–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F (2003) The empirical assessment of firms’ technological coherence: Data and methodology. Cantwell J, Gambardella A, Grandstand O, eds. The Economics and Management of Technological Diversification (Routledge, New York), 69–97.Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T, Gambardella A, eds. (2004) Building High-Tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1994) Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):24–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buis ML (2010) Stata tip 87: Interpretation of interactions in non-linear models. Stata J. 10(2):305–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G (2010) The ecology of technological progress: How symbiosis and competition affect the growth of technology domains. Soc. Forces 88(5):2163–2187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Bruggeman J (2009) Knowledge specialization, knowledge brokerage, and the uneven growth of technology domains. Soc. Forces 88(2):607–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Khessina OM (2005) The ecology of entrepreneurship. Alvarez SA, Agarwal R, Sorenson O, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research (Springer, New York), 167–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Bigelow LS, Seidel M-DL, Tsai LB (1996) The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American automobile industry, 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):117–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G (2006) Technological pre-adaptation, section, and emergence of new technologies: How Corning invented and developed fiber optics. Indust. Corporate Change 15(2):285–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen WR (2008) Determinants of firms’ backward- and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organ. Sci. 19(4):609–622.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Yao X, Kotha S (2009) Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists funding decisions. Acad. Management J. 52(1):199–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo JM, Silverman BS (2007) Churn, baby, churn: Strategic dynamics among dominant and fringe firms in a segmented industry. Management Sci. 53(4):632–650.Link, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P (1987) Classification in art. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(4):440–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrev SD, Gotsopoulos A (2010) Legitimacy vacuum, structural imprinting, and the first mover disadvantage. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1153–1174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan TPC (2010) De novo venture strategy: Arch incumbency at inaugural entry. Strategic Management J. 31(1):19–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Kotha R, Zheng Y (2008) Entry into insular domains: A longitudinal study of knowledge structuration and innovation in biotechnology firms. J. Management Stud. 45(8):1448–1474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Hannan MT, Kovács B (2015) What does it mean to span cultural boundaries? Variety and atypicality in cultural consumption. Amer. Sociol. Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Graham SJH, Merges RP, Samuelson P, Sichelman T (2009) High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system: Results of the 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 24(4):1255–1328.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Ziedonis RH (2001) The determinants of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1980–1994. Rand J. Econom. 32(1):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, eds. Patents, Citations and Innovations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 403–460.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hannan MT (2010) Partiality of memberships in categories and audiences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:159–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM, Vopel K (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 81(3):511–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT, Koçak Ö (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IPWatchdog (2011) Increasing patent allowance rates by selectively targeting a more technological patent class. IPWatchdog (blog) (April 6), http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/04/06/increasing-allowance-rates-by-selectively-targeting-patent-class/id=16283/.Google Scholar
• Khaire M, Wadhwani RD (2010) Changing landscapes: The construction of meaning and value in a new market category: Modern Indian art. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1281–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khessina OM, Carroll GR (2008) Product demography of de novo and de alio firms in the optical disk drive industry, 1983–1999. Organ. Sci. 19(1):25–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Hannan MT (2010) The consequences of category spanning depend on contrast. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, Research in the Sociology of Organizations 31 (Emerald Group, Bingley, UK), 175–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Johnson R (2014) Contrasting alternative explanations for the consequences of category spanning: A study of restaurant reviews and menus in San Francisco. Strategic Organ. 12(1):7–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai R, D’Amour A, Fleming L (2009) The career of U.S. inventors between 1975–2008. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Langlois RN, Steinmueller WE (1999) The evolution of competitive advantage in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1947–1996. Mowery DC, Nelson RR, eds. The Sources of Industrial Leadership (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 19–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Mens G, Hannan MT, Pólos L (2011) Founding conditions, learning, and organizational life chances: Age dependence revisited. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):95–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D (1991) Random walks and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):397–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim K (2004) The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries, 1981–1997. Res. Policy 33(2):287–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo Y, Kennedy MT (2015) Approval in nanotechnology patents: How institutional logics and pattern repetition affect reactions to category-blending. Organ. Sci. 26(1):119–139.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1999) Technological entry, exit and survival. Res. Policy 28(6):643–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martens M, Jennings J, Jennings PD (2007) Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1107–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• McKendrick DG, Carroll GR (2001) On the genesis of organizational forms: Evidence from the market for disk arrays. Organ. Sci. 12(6):661–682.Link, Google Scholar
• McKendrick DG, Jaffee J, Carroll GR, Khessina OM (2003) In the bud? Disk array producers as a (possibly) emergent organizational form. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):60–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merges RP, Nelson RR (1990) On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Rev. 90(4):839–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DJ (2006) Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 27(7):601–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montauti M, Wezel FC (2014) Category recombination and entrepreneurial inertia in the market for electronic music, 1978–2011. Acad. Management Proc. 10294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nanowerk (2008) Nanotechnology venture capital out of sync with returns. http://www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=5649.php.Google Scholar
• Negro G, Leung MD (2013) Actual and perceptual effects of category spanning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):684–696.Link, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2010) Categorical contrast and audience appeal: Niche width and critical success in winemaking. Indust. Corporate Change 19(5):1397–1425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2011) Category reinterpretation and defection: Modernism and tradition in Italian wine making. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1449–1463.Link, Google Scholar
• Oliver A (2009) Networks for Learning and Knowledge Creation in Biotechnology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Operti E, Carnabuci G (2014) Public knowledge, private gain: The effect of spillover networks on firms’ innovative performance. J. Management 40(4):1042–1074.Google Scholar
• Patel P, Pavitt K (1997) The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Res. Policy 26(2):141–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perretti F, Negro G, Lomi A (2008) E pluribus unum: Domain framing, candidate matching and organizational form emergence in U.S. television broadcasting, 1940–1960. Organ. Sci. 19(4):533–547.Link, Google Scholar
• Podolny J, Stuart T, Hannan MT (1996) Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Amer. J. Sociol. 102(3):659–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pólos L, Hannan MT, Carroll GR (2002) Foundations of a theory of social forms. Indust. Corporate Change 11(1):85–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How category leniency affects multiple audience evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Hannan MT (2014) An ecology of market categories. Sociol. Sci. 1:311–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogan M, Sorenson O (2014) Picking a (poor) partner: A relational perspective on acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):301–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Patterson K (2009) Credit and classification: The impact of industry boundaries in 19th-century America. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):486–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sgourev SV, Althuizen N (2014). “Notable” or “Not Able” when are acts of inconsistency rewarded? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):282–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):217–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmer R (2001) Using intellectual property data for competitive intelligence. Intellectual Asset Management and Technology Commercialization, Chap. 5 (Licensing Executives Society USA and Canada Inc., Alexandria, VA), http://patex.ca/pdf/publications/CH4-CompIntelRevB.pdf.Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorensen J, Stuart T (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2008) Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):266–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa ML (2013) Corporate structure, indirect bankruptcy costs, and the advantage of de novo firms: The case of gene therapy research. Organ. Sci. 25(3):850–867.Link, Google Scholar
• Studenmund AH (2001) Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide Addison Wesley, Boston.Google Scholar
• Suarez FS, Grodal S, Gotsopoulos A (2013) Perfect timing? Dominant category and the window of opportunity for firm entry into emerging industries Strategic Management J. 36(3):437–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2008) Handbook of Classification (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC), http://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/web/offices/opc/documents/handbook.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2014) Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC), http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s903.html.Google Scholar
• Waitz A, Bokhari W (2003) Nanotechnology commercialization best practices. http://www.quantuminsight.com/papers/030915_commercialization.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M (2013) Contextualizing the categorical imperative: Category linkages, technology focus, and resource acquisition in nanotechnology entrepreneurship. J. Business Venturing 28(1):117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• York JG, Lenox MJ (2014) Exploring the sociocultural determinants of de novo versus de alio entry in emerging industries. Strategic Management J. 35(13):1930–1951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the legitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2000) Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim TY, Ukanwa K, von Rittmann J (2003) Robust identities or non-entities? Typecasting in the feature film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar