PERSPECTIVE—Pragmatism in Organization Studies: Meeting the Challenges of a Dynamic and Complex World

References

• Abbott A (2001) Chaos of Disciplines (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler SP, Obstfeld D (2007) The role of affect in creative projects and explorative search. Indust. Corporate Change 16(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency: A case study of model changeover in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Adler SP, Benner M, Brunner DJ, MacDuffie JP, Osono E, Staats BR, Takeuchi H, Tushman ML, Winter SG (2009) Perspectives on the productivity dilemma. J. Oper. Management 27(2):99–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansell CK (2011) Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansell CK, Boin A, Farjoun M (2015) Dynamic conservatism: How institutions change to remain the same. Kraatz M, ed. Institutions and Ideals, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 44 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 89–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayim M (1974) Retroduction: The rational instinct. Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc. 10(1):34–43.Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley S (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1485–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin JD (1988) Habit, emotion, and self-conscious action. Sociol. Perspect. 31(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartunek JM, Rynes SL (2010) The construction and contributions of “implications for practice”: What in them and what might they offer? Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 9(1):100–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J (2006) Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals' social position. Organization 13(5):653–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson JK (1977) Organizations: A dialectical view. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality (Doubleday Anchor, New York).Google Scholar
• Berk G, Galvan D (2009) How people experience and change institutions: A field guide to creative syncretism. Theory Soc. 38(6):543–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein RJ (2011) Praxis and Action: Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Bigley GA, Roberts KH (2001) The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1281–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoc SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2):315–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Blumer H (1986) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (University of California Press, Berkeley). [Orig. pub. 1969 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NY).]Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P, Wacquant LJD (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The Management of Innovation (Tavistock, London).Google Scholar
• Campbell DT (1969) Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. von Bertalanffi L, Rapoport A, Meier RE, eds. General Systems, Vol. 14 (Mental Health Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI), 69–85.Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang JHY (2004) Mead’s theory of emergence as a framework for multilevel sociological inquiry. Symbolic Interaction 27(3):405–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J, Rodrigues SB (2011) How organizations engage with external complexity: A political action perspective. Organ. Stud. 32(6):803–824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chisholm D (1995) Problem solving and institutional design. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 5(4):451–491.Google Scholar
• Cohen MD (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5):773–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD (2012) Perceiving and remembering routine action: Fundamental micro level origins. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1383–1388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Commons JR (1934) Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Corbett AC, Harley B, Amason A, Ravasi D, Spicer A (2013) Opening up new vistas in categorization research. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1097–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corley KJ, Gioia DA (2011) Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):12–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunha MPE, Clegg SR, Kamoche K (2006) Surprises in management and organization: Concept, sources and a typology. British J. Management 17(4):317–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Weick KE (1984) Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):284–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damasio A (1994) Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1916) Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1922) Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology (Henry Holt and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1927) The Public and Its Problems (Holt, New York).Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1938) Experience and Education (Kappa Delta Pi, New York).Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1958) Experience and Nature (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY). [Orig. pub. 1925 (Open Court Publishing, Chicago).]Google Scholar
• Dickstein M (1998) The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. Zucker LG, ed. Institutional Patterns and Organizations, Culture and Environment (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 3–22.Google Scholar
• Dionysiou DD, Tsoukas H (2013) Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):181–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Takacs CH (2004) Team play: Heedful interrelating as the boundary for innovation. Long Range Planning 37(6):569–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Paolella L (2013) Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1100–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elkjaer B (2004) Organizational learning: The “third way.” Management Learn. 35(4):419–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elkjaer B, Simpson B (2011) Pragmatism: A lived and living philosophy. What can it offer to contemporary organization theory? Tsoukas H, Chia R, eds. Philosophy and Organization Theory, Research in the Sociology of organizations, Vol. 32 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 55–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M (1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(2):281–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Mische A (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):962–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans K (2010) Into the woods: A cautionary tale for governance. Admin. Governance 42(7):859–883.Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Orliowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Re-conceptualizing routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (1997) Social skill and institutional theory. Amer. Behav. Scientist 40(4):397–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fontrodona J (2002) Pragmatism and Management Inquiry: Insights from the Thought of Charles S. Peirce (Quorum Books, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral view of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47(2):209–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Schultz M, Corley KG (2000) Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):63–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Patvardhan SD, Hamilton AL, Corley KJ (2013) Organizational identity formation and change. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):123–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Navis C (2013) Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1124–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross N (2009) A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(3):358–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT (2010) Partiality of memberships in categories and audiences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:159–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helper S, MacDuffie JP, Sabel C (2000) Pragmatic collaborations: Advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism. Indust. Corporate Change 9(3):443–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernes T (2014) A Process Theory of Organization (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt M, Beamish PW, Jackson SE, Mathieu JE (2007) Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Acad. Management Rev. 50(6):1385–1399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgson GM (1994) The return of institutional economics. Smelser NJ, Swedberg R, eds. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 58–76.Google Scholar
• Hodgson GM (2004) The Evolution of Institutional Economics (Routledge, Abingdon, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgson GM, Knudsen T (2010) Darwin’s Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution (University of Chicago, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holm P (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):398–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson WA (1999) Dualism, duality, and the complexity of economic institutions. Internat. J. Soc. Econom. 26(4):545–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James W (1898) Philosophical conceptions and practical results. Burkhardt FH, ed. Pragmatism (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), 255–270.Google Scholar
• James W (1956) The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (Dover Publications, New York). [Orig. pub. 1897 (Longmans Green and Co., New York).]Google Scholar
• Jervis R (1999) System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Joas H (1996) The Creativity of Action (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT (2008) Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(2):270–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Fiss PC (2013) An ontological turn in categories research: From standards of legitimacy to evidence of actuality. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1138–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Lo J, Lounsbury M (2010) Category currency: A framework for analyzing the effects of meaning construction process. Hsu G, Negro G, Koçak Ö, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 31 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 369–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Clemens ES, Fry M (2011) Identity realization and organizational forms: Differentiation and consolidation of identities among Arizona’s charter schools. Organ. Sci. 22(3):554–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein G (2009) Streets and Shadows: Searching for the Keys for Adaptive Decision Making (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kloppenberg JT (1986) Uncertain Victory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Block ES (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 243–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Tsoukas H (2012) Introducing “Perspectives on process organizational studies.” Hernes T, Maitilis S, eds. Process, Sensemaking, and Organizing, Vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–26.Google Scholar
• Lawlor MS (2006) William James’s psychological pragmatism: Habit, belief, and purposive human behavior. Cambridge J. Econom. 30(3):321–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leblebichi H, Salancik GR, Copay A, King T (1991) Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):333–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorenz E (2000) Organisational routines in light of “old” institutional economics: Bringing politics back into the study of organisational learning. Eur. J. Econom. Soc. Systems 14(2):191–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovas B, Ghoshal S (2000) Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management J. 21(9):875–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKay B, Chia R (2013) Choice, chance and unintended consequences in strategic change: A process understanding of the rise and fall of Northco Automotive. Acad. Management J. 56(1):208–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon H (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Mead GH (1925) The genesis of the self and social control. Internat. J. Ethics 35(3):251–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mead GH (1934) Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Mead GH (1938) The Philosophy of the Act (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Menand L (2001) The Metaphysical Club (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) Social Theory and Social Action (Collier Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Murmann JP (2013) The coevolution of industries and important features of their environments. Organ. Sci. 24(1):58–78.Link, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Koçak Ö, Hsu G (2010) Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. Hsu G, Negro G, Koçak Ö, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 31 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 3–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nooteboom B (2012) A pragmatist theory of innovation. Melkas H, Harmaakorpi V, eds. Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications (Springer, Berlin), 17–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA III, Tushman MA (2008) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:185–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ormerod R (2006) The history and ideas of pragmatism. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57(8):892–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville J (2011) Routine revisited: Exploring the capability and practice perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):413–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1878) How to make our ideas clear. Popular Sci. Monthly (January):286–302.Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1931–1958) Collected Works: 1931–1958, edited by Hartshorne C, Weiss P, Burkes A (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (M. E. Sharpe, New York).Google Scholar
• Perrow C (1986) Complex Organizations, 3rd ed. (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (2003) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Poole MS, Van de Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):562–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Colyvas JA (2008) Microfoundations of institutional theory. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 276–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell TC, Lovallo D, Fox CR (2011) Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1369–1386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rescher N (2000) Process Philosophy: A Survey of Basic Issues (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M, Berk G (2010) From categorical imperative to learning by categories: Cost accounting and new categorical practices in American manufacturing, 1900–1930. Hsu G, Kocak O, Negro G, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 31 (Emerald Publishing Group, Bingley, UK), 255–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schön D (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Sewell WH Jr (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2001) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. 44(4):838–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996) The Science of the Artificial, 3rd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Simpson B (2009) Pragmatism, Mead and the practice turn. Organ. Stud. 30(12):1329–1347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stark D (2009) The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL (2008) Continual Permutations of Action (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Hardy C, Huy QA (2011) Where are the new theories of organization? Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):236–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swedberg R (2003) Economic versus sociological approaches to organizational theory. Tsoukas H, Knudsen C, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 373–391.Google Scholar
• Sztompka P (1991) Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Thagard P (2012) The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 99–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trafton A (2012) How the brain controls our habits. MIT News (October 29), http://news.mit.edu/2012/understanding-how-brains-control-our-habits-1029.Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H, Dooley KJ (2011) Introduction to the special issue: Towards the ecological style: Embracing complexity in organizational research. Organ. Stud. 6(32):729–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H, Knudsen C (2003) Introduction: The need for meta-theoretical reflection in organization theory. Tsoukas H, Knudsen C, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Ganco M, Hinnings CR (2013) Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):393–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veblen TB (1898) Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Quart. J. Econom. 12(4):373–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409–421.Link, Google Scholar
• West C (1989) The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitford J (2002) Pragmatism and the untenable dualism of means and ends: Why rational choice theory does not deserve paradigmatic privilege. Theory Soc. 31(3):325–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitford J, Zirpoli F (2014) Pragmatism, practice, and the boundaries of organization. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1823–1839.Link, Google Scholar
• Wicks AC, Freeman RE (1998) Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organ. Sci. 9(2):123–140.Link, Google Scholar
• Winter SG (2013) Habit, deliberation and action: Strengthening the micro foundations of routines and capabilities. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(2):120–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood C, Neal DT (2007) A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psych. Rev. 114(4):843–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar