Talking About Routines: The Role of Reflective Talk in Routine Change

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1024

References

  • Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anand G, Gray J, Siemsen E (2012) Decay, shock, and renewal: Operational routines and process entropy in the pharmaceutical industry. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1700–1716.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoch SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2):315–332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boden D (1994) The Business of Talk. Organizations in Action (Polity Press, London).Google Scholar
  • Cohen MD (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5):773–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G, Egidi M, Marengo L, Warglien M, Winter S (1996) Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corporate Change 5(3):653–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Davis K (1953) Management communication and the grapevine. Harvard Bus. Rev. 31(5):43–49.Google Scholar
  • Dionysiou D, Tsoukas H (2013) Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):181–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreyfus HL (1991) Being-in-the-World (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Dreyfus HL (2000) Responses. Malpas J, Wrathall MA, Dreyfus HL, eds. Heidegger, Coping and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 313–349.Google Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson R, Fretz RI, Shaw L (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fayard A-L, Metiu A (2014) The role of writing in distributed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1391–1413.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):727–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Practicing theory and theorizing practice. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Worline MC, Baker N, Lowerson V (2013) Routines, disruption and the temporalities of continuity. Working paper, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
  • Garud R, Dunbar RLM, Bartel CA (2011) Dealing with unusual experiences: A narrative perspective on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 22(3):587–601.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick CJG, Hackman JR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gherardi S (2012) How to Conduct a Practice-Based Study: Problems and Methods (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendry J, Seidl D (2003) The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. J. Management Stud. 40(1):175–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville JA, Rerup C (2016) A process perspective on organizational routines. Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA). Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Lazaric N, Denis B (2005) Routinization and memorization of tasks in a workshop: The case of the introduction of ISO norms. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):873–896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mueller F, Whittle A, Gilchrist A, Lenney P (2013) Politics and strategy practice: An ethnomethodologically-informed discourse analysis perspective. Bus. History 55(7):1168–1199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Obstfeld D (2012) Creative projects: A less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1571–1592.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (1994) Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(4):541–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville J (2011) Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):413–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):793–815.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Liu P (2012) Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1484–1508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Psathas G (1999) Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction analysis. Human Stud. 22(2–4):139–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C (2009) Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organ. Sci. 20(5):876–893.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3):577–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samra-Fredericks D (2003) Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction. J. Management Stud. 40(1):141–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silverman D (2001) Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, 2nd ed. (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  • Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas H (2009) A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(6):941–957.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H (2010) Practice, strategy making and intentionality: A Heideggerian onto-epistemology for strategy as practice. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaara E, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 47–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker AL, Edmondson AC (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Rev. 45(2):55–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turner SF, Rindova V (2012) A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ. Sci. 23(1):24–46.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Watson TJ (1995) Rhetoric, discourse and argument in organizational sense making: A reflexive tale. Organ. Stud. 16(5):805–821.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(4):628–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409–421.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yanow D, Tsoukas H (2009) What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account. J. Management Stud. 46(8):1339–1364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yates J, Orlikowski WJ (1992) Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Acad. Management Rev. 17(2):299–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5):955–972.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.