Unpacking the Dynamics of Ecologies of Routines: Mediators and Their Generative Effects in Routine Interactions

References

• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• AI Lab (2007) The Rediscovery of Intelligence: 20 Years of AI—In Zurich and Worldwide (AI Lab, University of Zurich, Zurich).Google Scholar
• Akrich M, Callon M, Latour B (2002) The key to success in innovation part I: The art of interessement. Internat. J. Innovation Management 6(2):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Fried Y (1988) The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Human Relations 41(4):305–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC (2004) Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 13(4):643–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC, Zirpoli F (2009) Innovation routines: Exploring the role of procedures and stable behaviour patterns in innovation. Becker MC, Lazaric N, eds. Organizational Routines: Advances in Empirical Research (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 303–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bijker WE (1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoch SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2):315–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Callon M (1986) Some elements of sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieux Bay. Law J, ed. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London), 196–233.Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2008) The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routine dynamics. Res. Policy 37(5):769–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2011) Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. J. Institutional Econom. 7(2):197–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2014) The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1325–1350.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1105–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):727–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2004) Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organ. Sci. 15(3):295–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2016) Routines as process: Past, present, and future. Howard-Grenville JA, Rerup C, Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed, Perspectives on Process Organization Studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 23–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2008) Routine dynamics. Barry D, Hansen H, eds. The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization (Sage Publications, London), 302–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Heimeriks KH, Madsen TL (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1351–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Nayyar PR, Shapira ZB, eds. (1997) Technological Innovation: Oversights and Foresights (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman JR (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harty C (2010) Implementing innovation: Designers, users and actor-networks. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management 22(3):297–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Latour B (1994) On technical mediation. Common Knowledge 3(2):29–64.Google Scholar
• Latour B (1996) On actor-network theory: A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Soziale Welt 47(4):369–381.Google Scholar
• Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law J, Hassard J, eds. (1999) Actor Network Theory and After (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J (2012) Materiality and Organizing (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4):502–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba E (1985) Naturalistic Enquiry (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Locke K (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Mäkelä K, Sumelius J, Höglund M, Ahlvik C (2012) Determinants of strategic HR capabilities in MNC subsidiaries. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1459–1483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner AS, Mezias SJ (1996) Ugly duckling no more: Pasts and futures of organizational learning research. Organ. Sci. 7(1):88–99.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, 4th ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nicolini D (2009) Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organ. Stud. 30(12):1391–1418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D (2010) Medical innovation as a process of translation: A case from the field of telemedicine. British J. Management 21(4):1011–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D (2013) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2012) Creative projects: A less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1571–1592.Link, Google Scholar
• Ohly S, Sonnentag S, Pluntke F (2006) Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. J. Organ. Behav. 27(3):257–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):433–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville JA (2011) Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):413–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K (2002) Innovating routines in the business firm: What corporate tasks should they be accomplishing? Indust. Corporate Change 11(1):117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng DX, Schroeder RG, Shah R (2008) Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective. J. Oper. Management 26(6):730–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2007) Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):781–795.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Liu P (2012) Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1484–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeifer R, Bongard JC (2007) How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Pickering A (2010) Material culture and the dance of agency. Hicks D, Beaudry MC, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford,UK), 191–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salter AJ, Martin BR (2001) The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Res. Policy 30(3):509–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvato C (2009) Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ. Sci. 20(2):384–409.Link, Google Scholar
• Salvato C, Rerup C (2011) Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. J. Management 37(2):468–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schatzki T (2011) Where the action is (on large social phenomena such as sociotechnical regimes). Sustainable Practices Research Group, Working Paper 1, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Turner SF, Rindova V (2012) A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ. Sci. 23(1):24–46.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, Thomke S, Sonnack M (1999) Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(5):47–57.Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research Design and Methods, 3rd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5):955–972.Link, Google Scholar